澳新受训者在制定方案技能方面的指导：本地证据的系统评价。
Instructions for Australian and New Zealand trainees in developing skills in formulation: a systematic review of local evidence.
机构信息
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Northern Adelaide Local Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
出版信息
Australas Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;29(5):546-549. doi: 10.1177/1039856221992633. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the peer-reviewed literature on psychiatric formulation.
METHODS
The term (formula*) was used to systematically search and . The resulting papers were reviewed.
RESULTS
Of the 42 papers located, 22 (52%) were published between 2002 and 2019; 90% papers were published in (15), (12) or (10), journals that focus on training and clinical practice. The papers varied in their aims and recommendations and not all justified the need for formulation. Formulation was recommended as a necessity for training, a communication tool and a guide to treatment. No article provided evidence for the superiority of any type of formulation, and the role of consumers in formulation was conspicuously lacking.
CONCLUSION
There are many ways to structure formulation. However, the existing literature does not support any particular approach. More consideration needs to be given to the needs of consumers in conceptualising and practicing formulation.
目的
研究精神科定式的同行评议文献。
方法
使用术语（formula*）系统地搜索 和 。审查得到的论文。
结果
在找到的 42 篇论文中，有 22 篇（52%）发表于 2002 年至 2019 年期间；90%的论文发表在 （15）、 （12）或 （10）上，这些期刊专注于培训和临床实践。这些论文在其目标和建议上存在差异，并非所有论文都证明了定式的必要性。定式被推荐为培训的必要条件、沟通工具和治疗指南。没有一篇文章提供任何特定类型定式具有优越性的证据，而且消费者在定式中的作用明显缺失。
结论
定式有多种结构方式。然而，现有文献并不支持任何特定的方法。在概念化和实践定式时，需要更多地考虑消费者的需求。
Zotero 插件