• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子健康(Seha)应用评估:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。

Evaluation of e-health (Seha) application: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.

机构信息

Health Administration Department, Business Administration School, King Saud University, Riyad, Saudi Arabia.

Biostatistics Department, Inaya Medical Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 18;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01437-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-021-01437-6
PMID:33736622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7977258/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Ministry of Health in Saudi Arabia is expanding the country's telemedicine services by using advanced technology in health services. In doing so, an e-health application (app), Seha, was introduced in 2018 that allows individuals to have face-to-face visual medical consultations with their doctors on their smartphones.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the app in improving healthcare delivery by ensuring patient satisfaction with the care given, increasing access to care, and improving efficiency in the healthcare system.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study design was used to assess the perceptions of users of the Seha app and non-users who continued with traditional health services. The data were collected using an online survey via Google Forms between June 2020 and September 2020. Independent t tests and chi-square (χ) tests were conducted to answer the research questions.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between users and non-users in terms of ease of access to health services (t =  - 9.38, p < 0.05), with app users having a higher mean score (4.19 ± 0.91) than non-users (3.41 ± 1.00); satisfaction with health services (t =  - 6.33, p < 0.05), with users having a higher mean score (3.96 ± 0.91) than non-users (3.45 ± 0.94); and efficiency (only one visit needed for treatment) (t =  - 3.20, p < 0.05), with users having a higher mean score (3.71 ± 0.93) than non-users (3.45 ± 0.93). There were significant associations between the use of the Seha app and age (χ = 8.79, p < 0.05), gender (χ = 22.19, p < 0.05), region (χ = 19.74, p < 0.05), and occupation (χ = 22.05, p < 0.05). There were significant relationships between the three items (on access, satisfaction, and efficiency) and experiencing technical issues (t = 4.47, t = 8.11, and t = 3.24, respectively, p < 0.05), with users who faced technical problems having significantly lower mean scores for all three items.

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence that the Seha app improved the delivery of healthcare in Saudi Arabia. Users of the app had a better health experience in terms of their perceived ease of access to healthcare services; their satisfaction with healthcare services; and the efficiency of the system, measured by the number of required doctor visits. Other factors that appeared to influence the use of the app included age, gender, usual source of care, and technical difficulties.

摘要

背景

沙特阿拉伯卫生部正在通过在卫生服务中使用先进技术来扩大该国的远程医疗服务。为此,2018 年推出了一款名为 Seha 的电子健康应用程序,该应用程序允许个人通过智能手机与医生进行面对面的可视医疗咨询。

目的

本研究评估了该应用程序通过确保患者对所提供护理的满意度、增加获得护理的机会以及提高医疗系统效率来改善医疗服务提供的效果。

方法

使用横断面研究设计来评估 Seha 应用程序用户和继续使用传统医疗服务的非用户的看法。数据是通过 2020 年 6 月至 9 月期间通过 Google 表单在线调查收集的。进行了独立 t 检验和卡方(χ)检验来回答研究问题。

结果

在获得医疗服务的便利性方面,用户和非用户之间存在显著差异(t=-9.38,p<0.05),应用程序用户的平均得分(4.19±0.91)高于非用户(3.41±1.00);对医疗服务的满意度(t=-6.33,p<0.05),用户的平均得分(3.96±0.91)高于非用户(3.45±0.94);以及效率(仅需一次就诊即可治疗)(t=-3.20,p<0.05),用户的平均得分(3.71±0.93)高于非用户(3.45±0.93)。Seha 应用程序的使用与年龄(χ=8.79,p<0.05)、性别(χ=22.19,p<0.05)、地区(χ=19.74,p<0.05)和职业(χ=22.05,p<0.05)之间存在显著关联。在获得服务的便利性、满意度和效率这三个项目之间存在显著关系(t=4.47,t=8.11,t=3.24,分别为 p<0.05),使用该应用程序遇到技术问题的用户在所有三个项目的平均得分明显较低。

结论

本研究提供了证据表明,Seha 应用程序改善了沙特阿拉伯的医疗服务提供。应用程序用户在获得医疗服务的便利性、对医疗服务的满意度以及系统效率(以所需就诊次数衡量)方面有更好的健康体验。其他似乎影响应用程序使用的因素包括年龄、性别、常规医疗来源和技术困难。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of e-health (Seha) application: a cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.电子健康(Seha)应用评估:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 18;21(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01437-6.
2
Current Knowledge, Satisfaction, and Use of E-Health Mobile Application (Seha) Among the General Population of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯普通人群对电子健康移动应用程序(Seha)的当前认知、满意度及使用情况:一项横断面研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Apr 1;15:667-678. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S355093. eCollection 2022.
3
Perceptions, Satisfaction, and Barriers to Telemedicine Use: A Community-Based Study From Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.远程医疗使用的认知、满意度及障碍:来自沙特阿拉伯吉达的一项社区研究
Cureus. 2023 Jun 21;15(6):e40738. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40738. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Knowledge, attitude and practice toward the mHealth app Mawid: a cross-sectional study.对移动健康应用 Mawid 的知识、态度和实践:一项横断面研究。
Int Health. 2023 May 2;15(3):342-350. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac062.
5
Patient Acceptance of e-Health Services in Saudi Arabia: An Integrative Perspective.沙特阿拉伯的电子医疗服务接受度:综合视角。
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Sep;25(9):847-852. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0107. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
Users' satisfaction levels about mHealth applications in post-Covid-19 times in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯后新冠疫情时期对移动医疗应用程序的用户满意度。
PLoS One. 2022 May 4;17(5):e0267002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267002. eCollection 2022.
7
Using mobile health applications to enhance physical activity in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study on users' perceptions.利用移动健康应用程序提高沙特阿拉伯的身体活动水平:基于用户认知的横断面研究。
Int Health. 2023 Jan 3;15(1):47-55. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihac008.
8
A Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Satisfaction With Healthcare Services Provided at the Ophthalmology Clinics in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯眼科诊所提供的医疗服务患者满意度横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Jan 13;16(1):e52202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52202. eCollection 2024 Jan.
9
Perception of Healthcare Providers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Method Survey in an Integrated Healthcare Delivery System in Saudi Arabia.在 COVID-19 大流行期间医疗保健提供者的认知:沙特阿拉伯综合医疗服务系统中的混合方法调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 12;19(24):16676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416676.
10
Factors Affecting Utilization of the E-Health "Seha" Interactive Application for Online Medical Consultation in Saudi Arabia.影响沙特阿拉伯电子健康“Seha”在线医疗咨询互动应用程序使用情况的因素
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Aug 29;15:1607-1619. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S349548. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Telemedicine: Measuring Beneficiaries' Satisfaction and Key Call Metrics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.了解远程医疗:衡量沙特阿拉伯王国受益者的满意度和关键通话指标。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Jul 22;12:23743735251361199. doi: 10.1177/23743735251361199. eCollection 2025.
2
Mobile applications available in Saudi Arabia for the management of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A quality review and content analysis.沙特阿拉伯用于原发性痛经管理的移动应用程序:质量评估与内容分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 12;20(6):e0325652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325652. eCollection 2025.
3
Perceived Telehealth Usability for Personalized Healthcare Among the Adult Population in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Post-COVID-19 Era.沙特阿拉伯成年人口对个性化医疗保健的远程医疗感知可用性:COVID-19 后时代的横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 1;13(1):62. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010062.
4
Evaluating the Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Saudi e-Healthcare System: An Empirical Study.评估沙特电子医疗保健系统的可持续竞争优势:一项实证研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Oct 18;17:4803-4814. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S467550. eCollection 2024.
5
A Comparison of the Convenience, Quality of Interaction, and Satisfaction of Virtual and In-Person Healthcare Consultations: A Nationwide Study.虚拟与面对面医疗咨询的便利性、互动质量及满意度比较:一项全国性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 2;13(17):5203. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175203.
6
Willingness to Pay for Telemedicine Services Among Uninsured Individuals in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Survey.沙特阿拉伯未参保人群对远程医疗服务的支付意愿:一项横断面调查。
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Sep 6;17:3879-3891. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S472926. eCollection 2024.
7
Development and Validation of the Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.基于技术接受与使用统一理论的沙特远程医疗接受度量表的开发与验证
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2024 Jul-Sep;12(3):236-243. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_358_23. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
8
Exploring physicians' expectations of telehealth services implementation in primary care: An application of the social cognitive theory.探索医生对基层医疗中远程医疗服务实施的期望:社会认知理论的应用
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Jun;13(6):2310-2322. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1498_23. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
9
Pattern of Virtual Consultations in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: An Epidemiological Nationwide Study.沙特阿拉伯虚拟咨询模式:一项全国范围的流行病学研究。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2024 Sep;14(3):817-826. doi: 10.1007/s44197-024-00219-3. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
10
Cardiovascular Disease in Saudi Arabia: Facts and the Way Forward.沙特阿拉伯的心血管疾病:事实与未来之路
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2023 Jun 10;35(2):148-162. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1336. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Current status of telehealth in Saudi Arabia during COVID-19.沙特阿拉伯在新冠疫情期间远程医疗的现状
J Family Community Med. 2020 Sep-Dec;27(3):208-211. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_295_20. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
2
Clinicians perceptions of a telemedicine system: a mixed method study of Makassar City, Indonesia.印度尼西亚望加锡市的一项混合方法研究:临床医生对远程医疗系统的看法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01234-7.
3
The public health care system and primary care services in Saudi Arabia: a system in transition.沙特阿拉伯的公共医疗保健系统和初级保健服务:转型中的系统。
East Mediterr Health J. 2020 Apr 16;26(4):468-476. doi: 10.26719/emhj.19.049.
4
Does gender matter? Exploring perceptions regarding health technologies among employees and students at a medical university.性别重要吗?探索医科大学员工和学生对健康技术的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103948. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care.比较视频、电话和面对面咨询的内容和质量:英国初级保健中一项非随机、准实验、探索性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug 29;69(686):e595-e604. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704573. Print 2019 Sep.
6
Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of video consulting: a qualitative study in primary care.视频咨询的可接受性、益处和挑战:初级保健中的定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug 29;69(686):e586-e594. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704141. Print 2019 Sep.
7
Utilization of digital primary care in Sweden: Descriptive analysis of claims data on demographics, socioeconomics, and diagnoses.瑞典的数字初级保健利用情况:基于索赔数据的人口统计学、社会经济学和诊断描述性分析。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
8
Methods of usability testing in the development of eHealth applications: A scoping review.电子健康应用程序开发中的可用性测试方法:范围综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jun;126:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Mar 31.
9
What drove the health system reforms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? An analysis.沙特阿拉伯王国医疗体系改革的驱动因素是什么?一项分析。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):100-110. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2584. Epub 2018 Aug 26.
10
Evaluation of a Digital Consultation and Self-Care Advice Tool in Primary Care: A Multi-Methods Study.基层医疗中数字化咨询和自我保健建议工具的评估:一项多方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 2;15(5):896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050896.