Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, 75 University Ave. West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Physiol Behav. 2021 May 15;234:113388. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113388. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Rats given intermittent access to 4% (w/v) sucrose solution elevate their consumption of solution relative to rats with continuous access, a difference that does not appear at higher concentrations. Here, we examined the hypothesis that a limit on the intake of sucrose calories prevents rats from demonstrating access-induced differences in consumption of a more concentrated sucrose solution. Energy-replete rats were given every day (ED) or every third day (E3D) access to sucrose solutions adulterated with bitter quinine which reduced solution palatability and consumption levels while intake was measured. In experiment 1, previously collected data were compiled to examine the trajectory of consumption of continuously available 4% sucrose solution which was shown to stabilize by day 3 and then informed group assignment. In experiment 2, daily consumption levels were higher for rats with E3D access to 4% sucrose solution than rats with ED access to the same solution, whereas rats consumed similar amounts of 8% sucrose solution across access schedules. In the first hour of solution availability rats with E3D access showed elevated sucrose solution consumption, relative to rats with ED access, for both 4% and 8% sucrose solution. Upon the addition of quinine (0.005%) sucrose solution consumption decreased and the E3D access group consumed more daily sucrose solution than the ED access group for both 4% and 8% sucrose solution. In experiment 3, four groups of rats were given ED or E3D access to 8% sucrose solution adulterated with 0.0025%, 0.005%, 0.01%, or 0.02% quinine. Quinine adulteration reduced 8% sucrose solution consumption and allowed rats with E3D access to elevate their consumption levels relative to rats with ED access; this effect persisted when all groups were switched to 8% sucrose + 0.02% quinine solution. Thus, daily access-induced consumption differences develop but do not emerge because of a caloric limit on sucrose solution intake. This work underscores the interaction of availability and caloric intake as determinants of sugar consumption and highlights an important distinction between animal models of food addiction and binge eating.
给予间歇性接触 4%(w/v)蔗糖溶液的大鼠相对于连续接触的大鼠,会增加对溶液的消耗,而在较高浓度下则不会出现这种差异。在这里,我们检验了这样一种假设,即蔗糖卡路里摄入量的限制阻止了大鼠在摄入更浓的蔗糖溶液时表现出摄入诱导的差异。给予能量充足的大鼠每天(ED)或每三天(E3D)接触添加苦味奎宁的蔗糖溶液,降低了溶液的适口性和消耗水平,同时测量了摄入量。在实验 1 中,编译了先前收集的数据,以检查连续提供的 4%蔗糖溶液消耗的轨迹,结果表明该溶液在第 3 天稳定,然后通知分组。在实验 2 中,与每天接触 4%蔗糖溶液的大鼠相比,E3D 接触的大鼠每天消耗的 4%蔗糖溶液水平更高,而大鼠在不同的接触方案下消耗的 8%蔗糖溶液量相似。在溶液可获得的最初 1 小时内,与每天接触 4%蔗糖溶液的大鼠相比,E3D 接触的大鼠消耗的蔗糖溶液量增加,E3D 接触的大鼠消耗的蔗糖溶液量增加,8%蔗糖溶液。添加奎宁(0.005%)后,蔗糖溶液的消耗减少,E3D 接触组消耗的每日蔗糖溶液量多于 ED 接触组,无论是 4%还是 8%的蔗糖溶液。在实验 3 中,四组大鼠每天接触 8%蔗糖溶液,溶液中添加 0.0025%、0.005%、0.01%或 0.02%的奎宁。奎宁的添加降低了 8%蔗糖溶液的消耗,并使 E3D 接触组相对于 ED 接触组提高了消耗水平;当所有组都切换到 8%蔗糖+0.02%奎宁溶液时,这种效应仍然存在。因此,每天的接触诱导的消耗差异会发展,但不会因为蔗糖溶液摄入的热量限制而出现。这项工作强调了可用性和热量摄入作为糖消耗决定因素之间的相互作用,并突出了食物成瘾和暴食动物模型之间的一个重要区别。