Understanding of research results, evidence summaries and their applicability-not critical appraisal-are core skills of medical curriculum.
作者信息
Tikkinen Kari A O, Guyatt Gordon H
机构信息
Departments of Urology and Public Health, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Surgery, South Karelian Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland.
出版信息
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):231-233. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111542. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Understanding of research results, evidence summaries and their applicability-not critical appraisal-are core skills of medical curriculum.理解研究结果、证据总结及其适用性——而非批判性评价——是医学课程的核心技能。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Oct;26(5):231-233. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111542. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
Development of critical appraisal skills in medical students: opportunities in oncology-related learning situations.
J Cancer Educ. 1991;6(3):141-4. doi: 10.1080/08858199109528110.
3
A multidisciplinary approach to information management and critical appraisal instruction: a controlled study.信息管理与批判性评价指导的多学科方法：一项对照研究。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Jan;80(1):23-8.
4
Critical Appraisal Worksheets for Integration Into an Existing Small-Group Problem-Based Learning Curriculum.用于融入现有小组基于问题的学习课程的批判性评估工作表
MedEdPORTAL. 2018 Feb 14;14:10682. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10682.
5
Evidence-based decision-making 1: Critical appraisal.循证决策1：批判性评价
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1281:385-96. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2428-8_23.
6
Critical appraisal turkey shoot: linking critical appraisal to clinical decision making.批判性评价轻松得分法：将批判性评价与临床决策联系起来。
Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10 Suppl):S87-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200010001-00028.
7
Time to think? Questionnaire survey of pre-registration house officers' experiences of critical appraisal in the Mersey Deanery.思考时间？对默西地区预注册住院医师批判性评估经历的问卷调查
Med Educ. 2007 May;41(5):487-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2007.02727.x.
8
An Innovative Shared Decision-Making Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents: Findings From the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.内科住院医师创新性共享决策课程：匹兹堡大学医学中心的研究结果。
Acad Med. 2018 Jun;93(6):937-942. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001967.
9
A novel approach to incorporating evidence-based medicine into an emergency medicine clerkship.一种将循证医学纳入急诊医学实习的新方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;20(3):295-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12089.
10
Evidence-based decision making in dental hygiene education, practice, and research.口腔卫生保健教育、实践与研究中的循证决策
J Dent Hyg. 2001 Winter;75(1):50-63.
引用本文的文献
1
Nutrition Users' Guides: an introduction to structured guides to evaluate the nutrition literature.《营养用户指南：评估营养文献的结构化指南介绍》
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025 Apr 7;8(1):e000832. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000832. eCollection 2025.
2
Harnessing Residents' Practice-based Inquiries to Enhance Research Literacy: The Thoughtful Reading of Evidence into Clinical Settings (T-RECS) Initiative.利用住院医师基于实践的探究提高研究素养：将证据审慎解读应用于临床环境（T-RECS）倡议。
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 29;26(3):564-568. doi: 10.5811/westjem.20921.
3
Evaluation of an evidence-based practice continuing education course for Canadian Naturopathic Doctors.针对加拿大自然疗法医生的循证实践继续教育课程评估。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 3;20(6):e0324452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324452. eCollection 2025.
4
Measuring evidence-based practice knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behavior in students of manual therapy education programs: A scoping review of instruments and their measurement properties.测量手法治疗教育项目学生基于证据的实践知识、技能、态度和行为：仪器及其测量特性的范围综述
J Chiropr Educ. 2024 Oct 23;38(2):179-189. doi: 10.7899/JCE-23-28.
5
Clinical Decision Rules: A Starting Place in Medical Education, Not a Destination.临床决策规则：医学教育的起点，而非终点。
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Oct;16(5):513-516. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00144.1. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
6
Integrating training in evidence-based medicine and shared decision-making: a qualitative study of junior doctors and consultants.将循证医学和共同决策培训相结合：对初级医生和顾问的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05409-y.
7
Evidence-Based Practice Competencies among Nutrition Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review.营养专业人员和学生基于证据的实践能力：一项系统综述。
J Nutr. 2024 Apr;154(4):1414-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.12.044. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
8
Interpretation and use of a decision support tool for multiple treatment options: a combined randomised controlled trial and survey of medical students.多治疗方案决策支持工具的解读和使用：一项综合随机对照试验和医学生调查。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):29-36. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112370.
9
"Trustworthiness," confidence in estimated effects, and confidently translating research into clinical practice.“可信度”、对估计效应的信心以及将研究可靠地转化为临床实践。
Arch Physiother. 2023 Apr 6;13(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00162-9.
10
Using research findings in my everyday practice: what is good evidence, where do I look, and how can I use it?在日常实践中运用研究成果：什么是好的证据，我在哪里可以找到它，以及我如何运用它？
Community Eye Health. 2022;35(117):7-8. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
本文引用的文献
1
Attitude and behaviour of Dutch Otorhinolaryngologists to Evidence Based Medicine.荷兰耳鼻喉科医生对循证医学的态度和行为。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 30;14(12):e0226743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226743. eCollection 2019.
2
GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions.GRADE 指南 26：用于沟通干预措施系统评价结果的信息性陈述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;119:126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
3
Knowledge and use of evidence-based medicine in daily practice by health professionals: a cross-sectional survey.卫生专业人员在日常实践中对循证医学的知晓与应用：一项横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e025224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025224.
4
Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey.卫生专业人员循证实践的核心能力：基于系统评价和德尔菲调查的共识声明。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281.
5
Introduction to BMJ Rapid Recommendations.《英国医学杂志》快速推荐介绍
BMJ. 2016 Sep 28;354:i5191. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5191.
6
Physicians and knowledge translation of statistics: Mind the gap.医生与统计学知识的转化：注意差距。
CMAJ. 2016 Jan 5;188(1):11-12. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.151254. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Do clinicians understand the size of treatment effects? A randomized survey across 8 countries.临床医生了解治疗效果的规模吗？一项针对8个国家的随机调查。
CMAJ. 2016 Jan 5;188(1):25-32. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150430. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
8
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.呈现决策结果的定量信息：为患者决策辅助工具开发者提供风险沟通基础
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
Knowledge translation of research findings.研究成果的知识转化。
Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-50.
10
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?什么是“证据质量”，它对临床医生为何重要？
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.BE.
Zotero 插件