Lafuente-Lafuente Carmelo, Leitao Catia, Kilani Insaf, Kacher Zineb, Engels Cynthia, Canouï-Poitrine Florence, Belmin Joël
Gériatrie à orientation Cardiologique et Neurologique, APHP, Hôpitaux univesitaires Pitié-Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Geriatrics Deparment, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e025224. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025224.
Healthcare professionals are expected to firmly ground their practice in sound evidence. That implies that they know and use evidence-based medicine (EBM). In this study, our aim was to know how often health professionals actually made use of EBM in their daily practice.
A questionnaire survey of healthcare professionals.
Healthcare professionals who attended six university postgraduate courses. 226 answered the questionnaire (144 physicians, 64 nurses and 24 pharmacists; response rate 63.3%).
56.5% of respondents worked in hospitals (mostly non-teaching), 25.0% in nursing homes and 10.2% in primary care. All participants were French-speaking and lived in France or Switzerland.
Declared degree of knowledge and use of EBM, use of EBM-related information sources.
Overall, 14.2% of respondents declared to use EBM regularly in their daily practice and 15.6% declared to use EBM only occasionally. The remaining respondents declared they: knew about EBM but did not use it (33.1%), had just heard about EBM (31.9%) or did not know what EBM is (4.0%). Concerning the use of EBM-related information sources, 83.4% declared to use at least monthly (or more often) clinical guidelines, 47.1% PubMed, 21.3% the Cochrane Library and 6.4% other medical databases.Fewer pharmacists (12%) declared to use EBM in their practice than nurses (22%) or doctors (36%). No difference appeared when analysed by gender, work setting or years after graduation. The most frequent obstacles perceived for the practice of EBM were: lack of general knowledge about EBM, lack of skills for critical appraisal and lack of time.
Only a minority of health professionals-with differences between physicians, nurses and pharmacists-declare to regularly use EBM in their professional practice. A larger proportion appears to be interested in EBM but seems to be deterred by their lack of knowledge, skills and personal time.
医疗保健专业人员应将其实践牢固地建立在可靠的证据基础之上。这意味着他们要了解并运用循证医学(EBM)。在本研究中,我们的目的是了解医疗保健专业人员在日常实践中实际运用循证医学的频率。
对医疗保健专业人员进行问卷调查。
参加六所大学研究生课程的医疗保健专业人员。226人回答了问卷(144名医生、64名护士和24名药剂师;回复率63.3%)。
56.5%的受访者在医院工作(大多为非教学医院),25.0%在养老院工作,10.2%在初级保健机构工作。所有参与者都讲法语,居住在法国或瑞士。
宣称的循证医学知识和使用程度、循证医学相关信息来源的使用情况。
总体而言,14.2%的受访者宣称在日常实践中经常使用循证医学,15.6%的受访者宣称只是偶尔使用循证医学。其余受访者宣称他们:了解循证医学但不使用(33.1%)、只是听说过循证医学(31.9%)或不知道循证医学是什么(4.0%)。关于循证医学相关信息来源的使用,83.4%的受访者宣称至少每月(或更频繁)使用临床指南,47.1%使用PubMed,21.3%使用考克兰图书馆,6.4%使用其他医学数据库。宣称在实践中使用循证医学的药剂师(12%)比护士(22%)或医生(36%)少。按性别、工作背景或毕业后年限分析时未发现差异。循证医学实践中最常遇到的障碍是:对循证医学缺乏一般知识、缺乏批判性评价技能和缺乏时间。
只有少数医疗保健专业人员(医生、护士和药剂师之间存在差异)宣称在其专业实践中经常使用循证医学。更大比例的人似乎对循证医学感兴趣,但似乎因缺乏知识、技能和个人时间而受到阻碍。