Suppr超能文献

采血部位和局部抗菌剂与污染培养物相关:前瞻性观察研究。

Sites of blood collection and topical antiseptics associated with contaminated cultures: prospective observational study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka, 596-8686, Japan.

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 18;11(1):6211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85614-7.

Abstract

We aimed to determine whether puncture sites for blood sampling and topical disinfectants are associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) of a single institution. This single-center, prospective observational study of 249 consecutive patients aged ≥ 20 years proceeded in the ED of a university hospital in Japan during 6 months. Pairs of blood samples were collected for aerobic and anaerobic culture from all patients in the ED. Physicians selected puncture sites and topical disinfectants according to their personal preference. We found 50 (20.1%) patients with potentially contaminated blood cultures. Fifty-six (22.5%) patients were true bacteremia and 143 (57.4%) patients were true negatives. Multivariate analysis associated more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine than with alcohol/chlorhexidine (adjusted risk difference, 12.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.8-16.9; P < 0.001). Sites of blood collection were also associated with contamination. Femoral and central venous with other sites were associated with contamination more frequently than venous sites (adjusted risk difference), 13.1% (95% CI 8.2-17.9; P < 0.001]) vs. 17.3% (95% CI 3.6-31.0; P = 0.013). Rates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly higher when blood was collected from femoral sites and when povidone-iodine was the topical antiseptic.

摘要

我们旨在确定在一家机构的急诊科(ED)中,采血部位和局部消毒剂与污染血培养的发生率之间是否存在关联。这项在日本一家大学医院 ED 进行的单中心、前瞻性观察研究共纳入了 249 例年龄≥20 岁的连续患者,持续 6 个月。所有 ED 患者均采集两份血样进行需氧和厌氧培养。医生根据个人偏好选择穿刺部位和局部消毒剂。我们发现 50 例(20.1%)患者的血培养可能受到污染。56 例(22.5%)患者为真性菌血症,143 例(57.4%)患者为真性阴性。多变量分析显示,与使用酒精/氯己定相比,使用聚维酮碘消毒穿刺部位时污染更频繁(调整风险差异,12.9%;95%置信区间 8.8-16.9;P<0.001)。采血部位也与污染有关。股静脉和中心静脉与其他部位比静脉部位更容易发生污染(调整风险差异),13.1%(95%置信区间 8.2-17.9;P<0.001)] vs. 17.3%(95%置信区间 3.6-31.0;P=0.013)。当从股静脉部位采集血液且使用聚维酮碘作为局部消毒剂时,污染血培养的发生率显著更高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Economic health care costs of blood culture contamination: A systematic review.血液培养污染的经济医疗成本:系统评价。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Aug;47(8):963-967. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.12.020. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Best Clinical Practice: Blood Culture Utility in the Emergency Department.最佳临床实践:急诊科血培养的应用
J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):529-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
6
Multimorbidity patterns: a systematic review.多种疾病模式:系统综述。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):254-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验