Vion Anne-Clémence, Perovic Tijana, Petit Charlie, Hollfinger Irene, Bartels-Klein Eireen, Frampton Emmanuelle, Gordon Emma, Claesson-Welsh Lena, Gerhardt Holger
Integrative Vascular Biology Laboratory, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Université de Nantes, CNRS, INSERM, l'institut du thorax, Nantes, France.
Front Physiol. 2021 Mar 2;11:623769. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.623769. eCollection 2020.
Vascular networks form, remodel and mature under the influence of multiple signals of mechanical or chemical nature. How endothelial cells read and interpret these signals, and how they integrate information when they are exposed to both simultaneously is poorly understood. Here, we show using flow-induced shear stress and VEGF-A treatment on endothelial cells , that the response to the magnitude of a mechanical stimulus is influenced by the concentration of a chemical stimulus, and vice versa. By combining different flow levels and different VEGF-A concentrations, front-rear polarity of endothelial cells against the flow direction was established in a flow and VEGF-A dose-response while their alignment with the flow displayed a biphasic response depending on the VEGF-A dose (perpendicular at physiological dose, aligned at no or pathological dose of VEGF-A). The effect of pharmaceutical inhibitors demonstrated that while VEGFR2 is essential for both polarity and orientation establishment in response to flow with and without VEGF-A, different downstream effectors were engaged depending on the presence of VEGF-A. Thus, Src family inhibition (c-Src, Yes, Fyn together) impaired alignment and polarity without VEGF-A while FAK inhibition modified polarity and alignment only when endothelial cells were exposed to VEGF-A. Studying endothelial cells in the aortas of VEGFR2 mutant mice and SRC mice confirmed the role of VEGFR2 and specified the role of c-SRC . Endothelial cells of VEGFR2 mutant mice lost their polarity and alignment while endothelial cells from SRC mice only showed reduced polarity. We propose here that VEGFR2 is a sensor able to integrate chemical and mechanical information simultaneously and that the underlying pathways and mechanisms activated will depend on the co-stimulation. Flow alone shifts VEGFR2 signaling toward a Src family pathway activation and a junctional effect (both and ) while flow and VEGF-A together shift VEGFR2 signaling toward focal adhesion activation () both modifying cell responses that govern orientation and polarity.
血管网络在多种机械或化学性质信号的影响下形成、重塑并成熟。内皮细胞如何读取和解释这些信号,以及当它们同时暴露于两种信号时如何整合信息,目前尚不清楚。在这里,我们通过对内皮细胞施加流动诱导的剪切应力和VEGF-A处理表明,对机械刺激强度的反应受化学刺激浓度的影响,反之亦然。通过结合不同的流动水平和不同的VEGF-A浓度,在内皮细胞中建立了相对于流动方向的前后极性,呈流动和VEGF-A剂量反应关系,而它们与流动的对齐则根据VEGF-A剂量呈现双相反应(在生理剂量下垂直,在无或病理剂量的VEGF-A下对齐)。药物抑制剂的作用表明,虽然VEGFR2对于在有或没有VEGF-A的情况下对流动的极性和方向建立都至关重要,但根据VEGF-A的存在,会激活不同的下游效应器。因此,Src家族抑制(c-Src、Yes、Fyn共同作用)在没有VEGF-A的情况下会损害对齐和极性,而FAK抑制仅在内皮细胞暴露于VEGF-A时才会改变极性和对齐。对VEGFR2突变小鼠和SRC小鼠主动脉中的内皮细胞进行研究,证实了VEGFR2的作用,并明确了c-SRC的作用。VEGFR2突变小鼠的内皮细胞失去了极性和对齐,而SRC小鼠的内皮细胞仅显示极性降低。我们在此提出,VEGFR2是一种能够同时整合化学和机械信息的传感器,其激活的潜在途径和机制将取决于共同刺激。单独的流动会使VEGFR2信号转导趋向于Src家族途径激活和连接效应(两者均为 和 ),而流动和VEGF-A共同作用会使VEGFR2信号转导趋向于粘着斑激活( ),两者都会改变控制方向和极性的细胞反应。