• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较小儿 1 型糖尿病患者连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗的效果:荟萃分析和前瞻性队列研究。

Comparison of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion and Multiple Daily Injections in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis and Prospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 2;12:608232. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.608232. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fendo.2021.608232
PMID:33737909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7961074/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of pediatric type 1 diabetes (T1D) is increasing worldwide, and the appropriate choice of therapy regimens is important for children, especially in developing countries with inadequate resources.

METHODS

We conducted a design combining meta-analysis and prospective cohort study. In meta-analysis, 14 studies involving 69,085 TID cases reported glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA) levels, including 48,363 multiple daily insulin injections therapy (MIT) and 20,722 continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). In our prospective cohort study, TID cases were recruited from a tertiary children's hospital, and randomly divided into Group MIT and Group CSII. After the 4-year follow-up, the effects of MDI (n = 112) and CSII (n = 76) therapy on glycemic control, long-term complications, as well as the growth and pubertal development were explored.

RESULTS

Compared to CSII in TID, HbA levels in MDI (WMD = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.23) were increased significantly in meta-analysis. Among 188 clinical cases, mean age at recruitment was 7.55 (SD 2.91) years. Duration of TID was 4.23 (SD 2.61) years. 50.53% (n = 95) of them were boys. The 4-year follow-up showed that children's HbA was 0.67 (95% CI -1.28, -0.05) % lower in children with CSII compared to children with MDI in multivariable regression models with adjustment for potential confounders (children's age at follow-up, duration of TID, gender, birthweight, parity, and delivery method). CSII was associated with 2.31 kg higher in children's weight (95% CI 0.59, 4.04) in the adjusted model. No difference was found in peripheral nerve and fundus consequences as well as the status of obesity and thin and pubertal development between CSII and MIT.

CONCLUSION

CSII might be associated with better glycemic control and better effect for children growth development. No higher risks of long-term complications and delayed pubertal development were observed in CSII. Our findings provided evidence for a better therapy regimen for T1D in children, nevertheless, they need to be validated by a larger sample size study.

摘要

背景

小儿 1 型糖尿病(T1D)的发病率在全球范围内呈上升趋势,对于儿童,尤其是资源不足的发展中国家的儿童,选择合适的治疗方案非常重要。

方法

我们进行了一项结合荟萃分析和前瞻性队列研究的设计。在荟萃分析中,14 项研究共纳入 69085 例 TID 病例,报告了糖化血红蛋白(HbA)水平,其中包括 48363 例多次每日胰岛素注射治疗(MIT)和 20722 例持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)。在我们的前瞻性队列研究中,TID 病例从一家三级儿童医院招募,并随机分为 MIT 组和 CSII 组。经过 4 年的随访,探讨了 MDI(n=112)和 CSII(n=76)治疗对血糖控制、长期并发症以及生长和青春期发育的影响。

结果

与 CSII 相比,荟萃分析中 MIT 组的 HbA 水平明显升高(WMD=0.21,95%CI:0.20-0.23)。在 188 例临床病例中,招募时的平均年龄为 7.55(SD 2.91)岁。TID 的病程为 4.23(SD 2.61)年。其中 50.53%(n=95)为男性。多变量回归模型校正潜在混杂因素(随访时儿童年龄、TID 病程、性别、出生体重、产次和分娩方式)后,4 年随访显示,CSII 组儿童的 HbA 较 MDI 组低 0.67%(95%CI:-1.28,-0.05)。校正模型中,CSII 组儿童体重增加 2.31kg(95%CI:0.59,4.04)。CSII 与 MIT 相比,周围神经和眼底并发症、肥胖和消瘦以及青春期发育状况无差异。

结论

CSII 可能与更好的血糖控制和儿童生长发育效果有关。CSII 未观察到长期并发症风险增加和青春期发育延迟。我们的研究结果为儿童 1 型糖尿病提供了更好的治疗方案证据,但需要更大样本量的研究来验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d1/7961074/c8779226912e/fendo-12-608232-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d1/7961074/cc7f36fa5bcf/fendo-12-608232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d1/7961074/7094131ba233/fendo-12-608232-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d1/7961074/c8779226912e/fendo-12-608232-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d1/7961074/cc7f36fa5bcf/fendo-12-608232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d1/7961074/7094131ba233/fendo-12-608232-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/73d1/7961074/c8779226912e/fendo-12-608232-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion and Multiple Daily Injections in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis and Prospective Cohort Study.比较小儿 1 型糖尿病患者连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗的效果:荟萃分析和前瞻性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 2;12:608232. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.608232. eCollection 2021.
2
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs modern multiple injection regimens in type 1 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.1 型糖尿病患者采用持续皮下胰岛素输注与现代多次胰岛素注射方案的比较:随机临床试验的更新荟萃分析。
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Sep;56(9):973-980. doi: 10.1007/s00592-019-01326-5. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
3
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in children and young people at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes: the SCIPI RCT.1 型糖尿病诊断时采用连续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗儿童和青少年:SCIPI RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Aug;22(42):1-112. doi: 10.3310/hta22420.
4
Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of CSII Versus MDI in Children and Adolescent With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Public Health Care System of China.中国公立医疗体系中 CSII 与 MDI 在儿童和青少年 1 型糖尿病患者中的临床结局和成本效益分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 30;12:604028. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.604028. eCollection 2021.
5
Pregnancy Outcomes and Insulin Requirements in Women with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion and Multiple Daily Injections: Cohort Study.持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次每日注射治疗1型糖尿病女性的妊娠结局及胰岛素需求:队列研究
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 May;19(5):280-287. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0412. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
6
Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI) in paediatric Type 1 diabetes: a multicentre matched-pair cohort analysis over 3 years.持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)与多次皮下注射(MDI)用于儿童1型糖尿病的比较:一项为期3年的多中心配对队列分析
Diabet Med. 2008 Jan;25(1):80-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02311.x.
7
Comparison of Insulin Pump Therapy and Multiple Daily Injections Insulin Regimen in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes During Ramadan Fasting.斋月禁食期间1型糖尿病患者胰岛素泵治疗与多次皮下注射胰岛素方案的比较
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(6):349-354. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0418. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
8
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple dose of insulin regimen display similar patterns of blood glucose excursions in pediatric type 1 diabetes.持续皮下胰岛素输注和多次胰岛素注射方案在儿童1型糖尿病中显示出相似的血糖波动模式。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2005 Aug;7(4):587-96. doi: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.587.
9
Comparing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections in children with Type 1 diabetes in Sweden from 2011 to 2016-A longitudinal study from the Swedish National Quality Register (SWEDIABKIDS).2011 年至 2016 年瑞典儿童 1 型糖尿病患者中持续皮下胰岛素输注与多次皮下胰岛素注射的比较:来自瑞典国家质量登记处(SWEDIABKIDS)的一项纵向研究。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Aug;22(5):766-775. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13217. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
[Metabolic control in young children with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (insulin pump)].[持续皮下胰岛素输注(胰岛素泵)治疗的1型糖尿病幼儿的代谢控制]
Endokrynol Diabetol Chor Przemiany Materii Wieku Rozw. 2003;9(1):11-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Technologies for Type 1 Diabetes and Contact Dermatitis: Therapeutic Tools and Clinical Outcomes in a Cohort of Pediatric Patients.1 型糖尿病和接触性皮炎的技术:儿科患者队列中的治疗工具和临床结果。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 15;13:846137. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.846137. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The current state of parent feeding behavior, child eating behavior, and nutrition intake in young children with type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病患儿的当前喂养行为、进食行为和营养摄入状况。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2020 Aug;21(5):841-845. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12997. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Machine learning-based mortality prediction of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: the SEMMELWEIS-CRT score.基于机器学习的心脏再同步治疗患者死亡率预测:SEMMELWEIS-CRT 评分。
Eur Heart J. 2020 May 7;41(18):1747-1756. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz902.
3
Association of Rotavirus Vaccination With the Incidence of Type 1 Diabetes in Children.
轮状病毒疫苗接种与儿童 1 型糖尿病发病率的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Mar 1;173(3):280-282. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4578.
4
Authoritarian parenting style predicts poorer glycemic control in children with new-onset type 1 diabetes.威权型教养方式预测新诊断 1 型糖尿病儿童的血糖控制较差。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1315-1321. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12726. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Statistical Primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses?统计学基础:异质性、随机效应模型分析还是固定效应模型分析?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Sep 1;27(3):317-321. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivy163.
6
Long-term study of tubeless insulin pump therapy compared to multiple daily injections in youth with type 1 diabetes: Data from the German/Austrian DPV registry.长期研究显示,与多次每日注射相比,无管胰岛素泵治疗在青少年 1 型糖尿病患者中的效果:来自德国/奥地利 DPV 登记处的数据。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Aug;19(5):979-984. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12658. Epub 2018 Apr 15.
7
Incidence of type 1 diabetes in China, 2010-13: population based study.2010 - 2013年中国1型糖尿病发病率:基于人群的研究
BMJ. 2018 Jan 3;360:j5295. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5295.
8
12. Children and Adolescents: .12. 儿童和青少年: 。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S126-S136. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S012.
9
Association of Insulin Pump Therapy vs Insulin Injection Therapy With Severe Hypoglycemia, Ketoacidosis, and Glycemic Control Among Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.胰岛素泵治疗与胰岛素注射治疗在1型糖尿病儿童、青少年及青年成人中与严重低血糖、酮症酸中毒及血糖控制的相关性
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1358-1366. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13994.
10
Use and Effectiveness of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) and Multiple Daily Insulin Injection Therapy (MIT) in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)与多次皮下注射胰岛素治疗(MIT)在1型糖尿病儿童、青少年及青年中的应用及疗效
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016 Feb;124(2):99-104. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-101155. Epub 2016 Feb 19.