Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2-E2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Esophagus. 2021 Oct;18(4):825-834. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00831-3. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
To compare short-term outcomes between two- vs. three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to clarify the optimal treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) in a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial.
An optimal number of NAC cycles remains to be established for locally advanced ESCC.
Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to either two (N = 91) or three (N = 89) courses of DCF (70 mg/m intravenous docetaxel and 70 mg/m intravenous cisplatin on day 1, and a continuous 700 mg/m fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks followed by surgery. We compared the two groups for perioperative parameters, adverse events, and the response to NAC.
The two- and three-course groups showed similar completion rates and overall NAC dose reductions. Although the two-course group showed significantly lower overall grades 3-4 leukopenia and anemia compared to the three-course group, the two groups had similar overall toxicity rates. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups, except arrhythmia (13 vs. 0%, P = 0.0007). Only two postoperative in-hospital deaths occurred in the three-course group, due to sepsis following severe pneumonia. Compared to the two-course group, the three-course group was associated with a significantly better clinical response (42.9 vs. 65.2%, P = 0.0027) and a relatively higher rate of pathological complete response (9.1 vs. 15.3%, P = 0.212).
Both two- and three-course DCF regimens in the NAC setting seemed to be equally feasible in locally advanced ESCC patients. Additional DCF courses led to a better NAC response without increasing the incidence of adverse events or postoperative morbidity.
University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (Identification Number UMIN 000015788).
通过一项多中心、随机、Ⅱ期试验,比较两周期与三周期新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗食管鳞癌(ESCC)的短期疗效,以明确最佳治疗方案。
对于局部进展期 ESCC,NAC 的最佳周期数仍有待确定。
将局部进展期 ESCC 患者随机分为两组,分别接受两周期(N = 91)或三周期(N = 89)的 DCF 方案(第 1 天静脉注射 70 mg/m2多西他赛和 70 mg/m2顺铂,第 1-5 天持续静脉滴注 700 mg/m2氟尿嘧啶)治疗,每 3 周重复一次,然后行手术治疗。我们比较了两组患者的围手术期参数、不良反应和 NAC 应答情况。
两周期组和三周期组的完成率和总 NAC 剂量降低情况相似。虽然两周期组的总 3-4 级白细胞减少症和贫血发生率明显低于三周期组,但两组的总体毒性发生率相似。两组患者的术后并发症无显著差异,除心律失常(13%比 0%,P = 0.0007)外。三周期组仅发生 2 例术后院内死亡,均因严重肺炎引起败血症。与两周期组相比,三周期组的临床应答率显著提高(42.9%比 65.2%,P = 0.0027),病理完全缓解率也相对较高(9.1%比 15.3%,P = 0.212)。
在局部进展期 ESCC 患者中,NAC 方案中的两周期和三周期 DCF 方案似乎同样可行。增加 DCF 周期可提高 NAC 应答率,而不增加不良反应或术后发病率。
日本大学医院医疗信息网临床试验注册系统(注册号 UMIN 000015788)。