Suppr超能文献

两程与三程术前顺铂和氟尿嘧啶加多西他赛治疗局部晚期食管癌:一项多中心随机 II 期试验的短期结果。

Two versus three courses of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel for treating locally advanced esophageal cancer: short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized phase II trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2-E2, Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Esophagus. 2021 Oct;18(4):825-834. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00831-3. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term outcomes between two- vs. three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to clarify the optimal treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) in a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND

An optimal number of NAC cycles remains to be established for locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to either two (N = 91) or three (N = 89) courses of DCF (70 mg/m intravenous docetaxel and 70 mg/m intravenous cisplatin on day 1, and a continuous 700 mg/m fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks followed by surgery. We compared the two groups for perioperative parameters, adverse events, and the response to NAC.

RESULTS

The two- and three-course groups showed similar completion rates and overall NAC dose reductions. Although the two-course group showed significantly lower overall grades 3-4 leukopenia and anemia compared to the three-course group, the two groups had similar overall toxicity rates. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups, except arrhythmia (13 vs. 0%, P = 0.0007). Only two postoperative in-hospital deaths occurred in the three-course group, due to sepsis following severe pneumonia. Compared to the two-course group, the three-course group was associated with a significantly better clinical response (42.9 vs. 65.2%, P = 0.0027) and a relatively higher rate of pathological complete response (9.1 vs. 15.3%, P = 0.212).

CONCLUSION

Both two- and three-course DCF regimens in the NAC setting seemed to be equally feasible in locally advanced ESCC patients. Additional DCF courses led to a better NAC response without increasing the incidence of adverse events or postoperative morbidity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (Identification Number UMIN 000015788).

摘要

目的

通过一项多中心、随机、Ⅱ期试验,比较两周期与三周期新辅助化疗(NAC)治疗食管鳞癌(ESCC)的短期疗效,以明确最佳治疗方案。

背景

对于局部进展期 ESCC,NAC 的最佳周期数仍有待确定。

方法

将局部进展期 ESCC 患者随机分为两组,分别接受两周期(N = 91)或三周期(N = 89)的 DCF 方案(第 1 天静脉注射 70 mg/m2多西他赛和 70 mg/m2顺铂,第 1-5 天持续静脉滴注 700 mg/m2氟尿嘧啶)治疗,每 3 周重复一次,然后行手术治疗。我们比较了两组患者的围手术期参数、不良反应和 NAC 应答情况。

结果

两周期组和三周期组的完成率和总 NAC 剂量降低情况相似。虽然两周期组的总 3-4 级白细胞减少症和贫血发生率明显低于三周期组,但两组的总体毒性发生率相似。两组患者的术后并发症无显著差异,除心律失常(13%比 0%,P = 0.0007)外。三周期组仅发生 2 例术后院内死亡,均因严重肺炎引起败血症。与两周期组相比,三周期组的临床应答率显著提高(42.9%比 65.2%,P = 0.0027),病理完全缓解率也相对较高(9.1%比 15.3%,P = 0.212)。

结论

在局部进展期 ESCC 患者中,NAC 方案中的两周期和三周期 DCF 方案似乎同样可行。增加 DCF 周期可提高 NAC 应答率,而不增加不良反应或术后发病率。

临床试验注册

日本大学医院医疗信息网临床试验注册系统(注册号 UMIN 000015788)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验