School of Finance & Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Dorstell Consult Ltd., Koforidua, Ghana.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):38506-38521. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12412-z. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Over the past two decades, global CO emissions have dramatically increased. In this context, this research aims to investigate a novel interaction between energy use, industrialization, and CO emissions as well as examine the underlying causal pathways with the implementation of more robust econometric methods to achieve valid and reliable results. Using estimation methods of AMG, CCEMG, and DCCEMG, this study shows that in the long-term energy use, industrialization, urbanization, and fossil fuel consumption have a non-significant positive impact on CO emissions for SSA countries with the exception of energy use depicting a significant impact. The documented results and findings are robust as compared to other studies. Furthermore, the study portrays the causal front as a bi-directional causal pathway between CO emissions, energy use, industrialization, and fossil fuel consumption with a uni-directional causal route to urbanization. Many of the variables are held to be causative agents of one another. The study suggests that policies that promote energy conservation and reduce CO emissions can be useful in achieving a lower emission rate. Policymakers and corporations should also abide by the laws and regulations on emissions mitigation. Companies need to invest in R&D as much as governments encourage business growth and development to help minimize emissions and degrade the environment. Similarly, the government should empower industries and households to acquire emission-reduction machinery.
在过去的二十年中,全球二氧化碳排放量大幅增加。在此背景下,本研究旨在探讨能源利用、工业化和二氧化碳排放之间的新的相互作用,并通过实施更强大的计量经济学方法来检验潜在的因果途径,以获得有效和可靠的结果。本研究采用 AMG、CCEMG 和 DCCEMG 的估计方法,表明在长期内,能源利用、工业化、城市化和化石燃料消耗对除能源利用外的其他因素对 SS 国家的二氧化碳排放没有显著的积极影响。与其他研究相比,所记录的结果和发现更为可靠。此外,该研究还表明,在因果关系方面,二氧化碳排放、能源利用、工业化和化石燃料消耗之间存在双向因果关系,而城市化则存在单向因果关系。许多变量被认为是彼此的原因。该研究表明,促进能源节约和减少二氧化碳排放的政策对于实现更低的排放率可能是有用的。政策制定者和企业也应该遵守关于减排的法律法规。企业需要像政府鼓励企业增长和发展一样,在研发方面进行投资,以帮助减少排放和改善环境。同样,政府应该授权工业界和家庭购买减排机器。