• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构化教育在降低2型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者脂肪营养不良及其代谢并发症中的作用:一项随机多中心病例对照研究

Role of Structured Education in Reducing Lypodistrophy and its Metabolic Complications in Insulin-Treated People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Multicenter Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Gentile Sandro, Guarino Giuseppina, Della Corte Teresa, Marino Giampiero, Satta Ersilia, Pasquarella Maria, Romano Carmine, Alfrone Carmelo, Strollo Felice

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Campania University "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.

Nefrocenter Research Network and Nyx Start-Up, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1379-1398. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01006-0. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1007/s13300-021-01006-0
PMID:33738775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8099954/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is essential to use the correct injection technique (IT) to avoid skin complications such as lipohypertrophy (LH), local inflammation, bruising, and consequent repeated unexplained hypoglycemia episodes (hypos) as well as high HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) levels, glycemic variability (GV), and insulin doses. Structured education plays a prominent role in injection technique improvement. The aim was to assess the ability of structured education to reduce (i) GV and hypos, (ii) HbA1c levels, (iii) insulin daily doses, and (iv) overall healthcare-related costs in outpatients with T2DM who were erroneously injecting insulin into LH.

METHODS

318 patients aged 19-75 years who had been diagnosed with T2DM for at least 5 years, were being treated with insulin, were routinely followed by a private network of healthcare centers, and who had easily seen and palpable LH nodules were included in the study. At the beginning of the 6-month run-in period (T-6), all patients were trained to perform structured self-monitoring of blood glucose and to monitor symptomatic and severe hypos (SyHs and SeHs, respectively). After that (at T0), the patients were randomly and equally divided into an intervention group who received appropriate IT education (IG) and a control group (CG), and were followed up for six months (until T+6). Healthcare cost calculations (including resource utilization, loss of productivity, and more) were carried out based on the average NHS reimbursement price list.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were the same for both groups. During follow-up, the intra-LH injection rate for the CG progressively decreased to 59.9% (p < 0.001), a much smaller decrease than seen for the IG (1.9%, p < 0.001). Only the IG presented significant decreases in HbA1c (8.2 ± 1.2% vs. 6.2 ± 0.9%; p < 0.01), GV (247 ± 61 mg/dl vs. 142 ± 31 mg/dl; p < 0.01), insulin requirement (- 20.7%, p < 0.001), and SeH and SyH prevalence (which dropped dramatically from 16.4 to 0.6% and from 83.7 to 7.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the IG group only, costs-including those due to the reduced insulin requirement-decreased significantly, especially those relating to SeHs and SyHs, which dropped to €25.8 and €602.5, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Within a 6-month observation period, intensive structured education yielded consistently improved metabolic results and led to sharp decreases in the hypo rate and the insulin requirement. These improvements resulted in a parallel drop in overall healthcare costs, representing a tremendous economic advantage for the NHS. These positive results should encourage institutions to resolve the apparently intractable problem of LH by financially incentivizing healthcare teams to provide patients with intensive structured education on proper injection technique.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration no. 118/15.04.2018, approved by the Scientific and Ethics Committee of Campania University "Luigi Vanvitelli," Naples, Italy, and by the institutional review board (IRB Min. no. 9926 dated 05.05.2018).

摘要

引言

采用正确的注射技术(IT)对于避免皮肤并发症至关重要,如脂肪增生(LH)、局部炎症、瘀伤,以及随之而来的反复不明原因低血糖发作(低血糖),还有高糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平、血糖变异性(GV)和胰岛素剂量。结构化教育在改善注射技术方面发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在评估结构化教育对降低2型糖尿病(T2DM)门诊患者以下指标的能力:(i)血糖变异性和低血糖发作;(ii)糖化血红蛋白水平;(iii)每日胰岛素剂量;(iv)总体医疗相关费用,这些患者存在错误地将胰岛素注射到脂肪增生部位的情况。

方法

纳入318例年龄在19 - 75岁之间、已确诊T2DM至少5年、正在接受胰岛素治疗、由私立医疗中心网络定期随访且有易于观察和触及的脂肪增生结节的患者。在6个月的导入期开始时(T - 6),对所有患者进行培训,使其能够进行结构化的血糖自我监测,并监测有症状低血糖和严重低血糖(分别为SyHs和SeHs)。之后(在T0时),将患者随机且平均分为接受适当注射技术教育的干预组(IG)和对照组(CG),并随访6个月(直至T + 6)。基于英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的平均报销价格表进行医疗费用计算(包括资源利用、生产力损失等)。

结果

两组的基线特征相同。在随访期间,CG组注射到脂肪增生部位内的比例逐渐降至59.9%(p < 0.001),下降幅度远小于IG组(1.9%,p < 0.001)。只有IG组的糖化血红蛋白(8.2 ± 1.2% vs. 6.2 ± 0.9%;p < 0.01)、血糖变异性(247 ± 61 mg/dl vs. 142 ± 31 mg/dl;p < 0.01)、胰岛素需求量(-20.7%,p < 0.001)以及严重低血糖和有症状低血糖的患病率(分别从16.4%急剧降至0.6%和从83.7%降至7.6%;p < 0.001)显著下降。仅在IG组中,包括因胰岛素需求量减少而产生的费用在内的成本显著降低,尤其是与严重低血糖和有症状低血糖相关的费用,分别降至25.8欧元和602.5欧元(p < 0.001)。

结论

在6个月的观察期内,强化结构化教育持续改善了代谢结果,并导致低血糖发生率和胰岛素需求量大幅下降。这些改善使总体医疗费用相应降低,这对英国国家医疗服务体系而言是巨大的经济优势。这些积极结果应促使各机构通过经济激励医疗团队为患者提供关于正确注射技术的强化结构化教育,来解决脂肪增生这一明显棘手的问题。

试验注册

试验注册号118/15.04.2018,经意大利那不勒斯坎帕尼亚大学“路易吉·万维泰利”科学与伦理委员会以及机构审查委员会(IRB编号9926,日期为2018年5月5日)批准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/d87d34734f98/13300_2021_1006_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/f44ac101f284/13300_2021_1006_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/42a473c75f4b/13300_2021_1006_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/eee0df0cf4da/13300_2021_1006_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/d87d34734f98/13300_2021_1006_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/f44ac101f284/13300_2021_1006_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/42a473c75f4b/13300_2021_1006_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/eee0df0cf4da/13300_2021_1006_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/8099954/d87d34734f98/13300_2021_1006_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Role of Structured Education in Reducing Lypodistrophy and its Metabolic Complications in Insulin-Treated People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Multicenter Case-Control Study.结构化教育在降低2型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者脂肪营养不良及其代谢并发症中的作用:一项随机多中心病例对照研究
Diabetes Ther. 2021 May;12(5):1379-1398. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01006-0. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
The Economic Burden of Insulin Injection-Induced Lipohypertophy. Role of Education: The ISTERP-3 Study.胰岛素注射致脂肪增生的经济负担。教育的作用:ISTERP-3 研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):2192-2207. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02105-5. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
3
Lipohypertrophy in Elderly Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.老年 2 型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者的脂肪增生
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Jan;12(1):107-119. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00954-3. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
4
The Durability of an Intensive, Structured Education-Based Rehabilitation Protocol for Best Insulin Injection Practice: The ISTERP-2 Study.基于强化结构化教育的最佳胰岛素注射实践康复方案的持久性:ISTERP-2研究
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Sep;12(9):2557-2569. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01108-9. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
5
Insulin-Induced Skin Lipohypertrophy in Type 2 Diabetes: a Multicenter Regional Survey in Southern Italy.2型糖尿病中胰岛素诱导的皮肤脂肪增生:意大利南部的一项多中心区域调查
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Sep;11(9):2001-2017. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00876-0. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
6
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
7
Why Do So Many People with Type 2 Diabetes Who Take Insulin Have Lipohypertrophy? Fate or Educational Deficiencies?为什么这么多使用胰岛素的2型糖尿病患者会出现脂肪增生?是命运还是教育缺失?
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Jan;14(1):179-191. doi: 10.1007/s13300-022-01341-w. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
8
Injection Technique Education in Patients with Diabetes Injecting Insulin into Areas of Lipohypertrophy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.糖尿病患者注射技术教育:将胰岛素注射到脂肪增生部位的随机对照试验
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Mar;12(3):813-826. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01013-1. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
Lipohypertrophy in China: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Insulin Consumption, and Clinical Impact.中国的脂肪肥厚症:流行情况、风险因素、胰岛素消耗和临床影响。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jan;19(1):61-67. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0334.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for Lipohypertrophy in People With Insulin-Treated Diabetes: A Systematic Meta-Analysis.胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者脂肪增生的危险因素:一项系统的Meta分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Mar 20:19322968251325569. doi: 10.1177/19322968251325569.
2
Health-Economic Modelling of Improved Behavior in Insulin Injection Technique in Belgium.比利时胰岛素注射技术改善行为的健康经济模型
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 Mar;9(2):259-270. doi: 10.1007/s41669-024-00547-x. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
3
Lipohypertrophy and Insulin: An Update From the Diabetes Technology Society.

本文引用的文献

1
Lipohypertrophy in Elderly Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.老年 2 型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者的脂肪增生
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Jan;12(1):107-119. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00954-3. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
2
Insulin-Induced Skin Lipohypertrophy in Type 2 Diabetes: a Multicenter Regional Survey in Southern Italy.2型糖尿病中胰岛素诱导的皮肤脂肪增生:意大利南部的一项多中心区域调查
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Sep;11(9):2001-2017. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00876-0. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
3
The Injection Technique Factor: What You Don't Know or Teach Can Make a Difference.
脂肪肥厚与胰岛素:糖尿病技术学会的最新更新。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1711-1721. doi: 10.1177/19322968231187661. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
4
A self-controlled, cross-over study of intensive insulin treatment with needle-based injection versus needle-free injection in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.一项针对住院 2 型糖尿病患者强化胰岛素治疗的自身对照、交叉研究:针式注射与无针注射的比较。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 12;14:1162176. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1162176. eCollection 2023.
5
The Economic Burden of Insulin Injection-Induced Lipohypertophy. Role of Education: The ISTERP-3 Study.胰岛素注射致脂肪增生的经济负担。教育的作用:ISTERP-3 研究。
Adv Ther. 2022 May;39(5):2192-2207. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02105-5. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
6
Efficacy of education on injection technique for patients diagnosed with diabetes with lipohypertrophy: systematic review and meta-analysis.患有脂肪营养不良的糖尿病患者注射技术教育效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 7;12(3):e055529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055529.
7
A Systematic Survey of Physicians' Insights Into Lipohypertrophy.对医师对脂肪肥厚的认识进行系统调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;9:738179. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.738179. eCollection 2021.
8
The Durability of an Intensive, Structured Education-Based Rehabilitation Protocol for Best Insulin Injection Practice: The ISTERP-2 Study.基于强化结构化教育的最佳胰岛素注射实践康复方案的持久性:ISTERP-2研究
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Sep;12(9):2557-2569. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01108-9. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
注射技术因素:你所不知道或未传授的内容可能会产生影响。
Clin Diabetes. 2019 Jul;37(3):227-233. doi: 10.2337/cd18-0076.
4
Insulin-Related Lipohypertrophy in Hemodialyzed Diabetic People: a Multicenter Observational Study and a Methodological Approach.血液透析糖尿病患者的胰岛素相关脂肪增生:一项多中心观察性研究及方法学探讨
Diabetes Ther. 2019 Aug;10(4):1423-1433. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-0650-2. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
5
Why are so huge differences reported in the occurrence rate of skin lipohypertrophy? Does it depend on method defects or on lack of interest?为什么皮肤脂肪增生的发生率报告存在如此巨大的差异?这是取决于方法缺陷还是缺乏关注?
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Jan-Feb;13(1):682-686. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.11.042. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
6
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断:
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S13-S28. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S002.
7
Cost saving effects of a short-term educational intervention entailing lower hypoglycaemic event rates in people with type 1 diabetes and lipo-hypertrophy.一项短期教育干预措施在1型糖尿病患者中降低低血糖事件发生率及脂肪增生的成本节约效果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep;143:320-321. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
8
Glucose variability for cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.2型糖尿病中心血管危险因素的血糖变异性:一项荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2017 Nov 14;16:45. doi: 10.1186/s40200-017-0323-5. eCollection 2017.
9
Optimizing insulin injection technique and its effect on blood glucose control.优化胰岛素注射技术及其对血糖控制的影响。
J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2014 Jul 23;1(4):145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jcte.2014.07.006. eCollection 2014 Dec.
10
An Effective Intervention for Diabetic Lipohypertrophy: Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Multicenter Study in France.一项针对糖尿病性脂肪营养不良的有效干预措施:法国一项随机、对照、前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Nov;19(11):623-632. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0165. Epub 2017 Oct 23.