• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共存或疑似纤维肌痛诊断是否会影响对慢性非癌痛患者进行诊断性阻滞的决策 - 一项观察性研究结果。

Should a Coexisting or Suspected Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia Affect the Decision to Perform Diagnostic Blocks for Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain - Results from an Observational Research Study.

机构信息

Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2021 Mar;24(2):185-192.

PMID:33740354
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic injections (blocks) are a valuable tool in the management of chronic noncancer pain. By precise blockade of specific neural structures and observation of pain responses, pain mechanisms can be accurately defined. With such information, therapeutic procedures targeting neural structures are possible. Fibromyalgia is a disorder of pain processing with characteristic symptoms. The 2010 American College of Rheumatologists fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria evaluates these symptoms in a scoring system, allowing more objectivity in the diagnosis. We hypothesize that patients with fibromyalgia phenotype fulfilling the 2010 American College of Rheumatologists criteria may respond to diagnostic blocks differently when compared to patients without fibromyalgia phenotype.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to establish whether diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of fibromyalgia should influence the decision to perform diagnostic blocks for chronic non-cancer pain.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective observational research study was performed at our institution. IRAS project ID: 231514.

SETTING

Tertiary pain clinic in the UK.

METHODS

Patients were selected to receive diagnostic block by usual clinical assessment after which they were asked to consent to take part in the study. All participating patients completed the 2010 American College of Rheumatologists fibromyalgia diagnostic questionnaire prior to the diagnostic block. Patients were divided into 2 groups A and B based on the outcome of block - primary outcome. Group A experienced a 70% or greater improvement in pain severity following the block for the anticipated duration of action of the local anesthetic, Group B experienced a less than 70% reduction in pain. Statistical analysis between groups A and B was conducted by comparing categorical data, described as percentages, with the chi squared test. Ordinal variables such as Widespread pain index and Symptom severity score are presented as median and analyzed with Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were included in the study. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Of the 75 remaining patients, 44 received lumbar medial branch blocks, 19 genicular nerve blocks, 3 blocks to nerves supplying the sacroiliac joint, one suprascapular nerve block, and 6 cervical and 2 thoracic medial branch blocks. Group A contained 38 patients and group B contained 37 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of fibromyalgia screening questionnaire positive patients between groups A (13 out of 38 patients) and B (13 out of 37 patients), P = 0.93. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of fibromyalgia screening questionnaire positive patients in subgroups undergoing the same type of diagnostic block (spinal pain and knee pain).

LIMITATIONS

Selection of patients prior to inclusion in the study may introduce bias. Patients were selected by individual treating clinicians using usual clinical practice; however, the exact selection criteria were not standardized.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that after physician selection, the presence of fibromyalgia phenotype does not influence the outcome from diagnostic block. It is likely therefore that fibromyalgia phenotype should not influence the decision to perform diagnostic blocks if indicated based on assessment by an experienced pain physician.

摘要

背景

诊断性注射(阻滞)是慢性非癌性疼痛管理中的一种有价值的工具。通过对特定神经结构的精确阻滞和观察疼痛反应,可以准确定义疼痛机制。有了这些信息,就可以针对神经结构进行治疗。纤维肌痛是一种以特征性症状为特征的疼痛处理障碍。2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛诊断标准通过评分系统评估这些症状,使诊断更加客观。我们假设,符合 2010 年美国风湿病学会标准的纤维肌痛表型患者在接受诊断性阻滞时的反应可能与无纤维肌痛表型的患者不同。

目的

本研究旨在确定纤维肌痛的诊断或疑似诊断是否会影响对慢性非癌性疼痛进行诊断性阻滞的决策。

研究设计

这是一项在我们机构进行的前瞻性观察性研究。IRAS 项目 ID:231514。

地点

英国的一家三级疼痛诊所。

方法

患者在接受常规临床评估后被选择接受诊断性阻滞,然后被要求同意参与研究。所有参与的患者在接受诊断性阻滞前都完成了 2010 年美国风湿病学会纤维肌痛诊断问卷。根据阻滞的预期局部麻醉作用持续时间,患者分为 A 组和 B 组(主要结局)。A 组的疼痛严重程度在阻滞后改善了 70%或以上,B 组的疼痛缓解程度低于 70%。通过比较分类数据(以百分比表示)和卡方检验对 A 组和 B 组之间进行统计学分析。广泛疼痛指数和症状严重程度评分等有序变量以中位数表示,并采用曼-惠特尼检验进行分析。

结果

共有 77 名患者纳入研究。2 名患者失访。在 75 名剩余患者中,44 名接受了腰椎内侧支阻滞,19 名接受了关节内神经阻滞,3 名接受了供应骶髂关节的神经阻滞,1 名接受了肩胛上神经阻滞,6 名接受了颈椎和 2 名接受了胸椎内侧支阻滞。A 组包含 38 名患者,B 组包含 37 名患者。A 组(38 名患者中有 13 名)和 B 组(37 名患者中有 13 名)的纤维肌痛筛查问卷阳性患者的患病率之间无统计学显著差异,P = 0.93。在接受相同类型诊断性阻滞的亚组中(脊柱疼痛和膝关节疼痛),纤维肌痛筛查问卷阳性患者的患病率也无统计学显著差异。

局限性

在纳入研究之前选择患者可能会引入偏倚。患者由每位治疗医生根据常规临床实践选择;然而,具体的选择标准没有标准化。

结论

我们的结论是,在医生选择之后,纤维肌痛表型的存在并不影响诊断性阻滞的结果。因此,如果基于经验丰富的疼痛医生的评估,纤维肌痛表型可能不应影响进行诊断性阻滞的决策。

相似文献

1
Should a Coexisting or Suspected Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia Affect the Decision to Perform Diagnostic Blocks for Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain - Results from an Observational Research Study.共存或疑似纤维肌痛诊断是否会影响对慢性非癌痛患者进行诊断性阻滞的决策 - 一项观察性研究结果。
Pain Physician. 2021 Mar;24(2):185-192.
2
Therapeutic cervical medial branch blocks in managing chronic neck pain: a preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: clinical trial NCT0033272.治疗性颈椎内侧支阻滞治疗慢性颈痛:一项随机、双盲、对照试验的初步报告:临床试验NCT0033272
Pain Physician. 2006 Oct;9(4):333-46.
3
Comparative outcomes of a 2-year follow-up of cervical medial branch blocks in management of chronic neck pain: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.比较 2 年随访期内颈椎内侧支阻滞治疗慢性颈痛的疗效:一项随机、双盲对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2010 Sep-Oct;13(5):437-50.
4
Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines for Facet Joint Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines Facet Joint Interventions 2020 Guidelines.综合循证指南:脊柱关节突关节介入治疗慢性脊柱疼痛管理:美国介入疼痛医师学会(ASIPP)指南 2020 年脊柱关节突关节介入治疗指南。
Pain Physician. 2020 May;23(3S):S1-S127.
5
Evaluation of therapeutic thoracic medial branch block effectiveness in chronic thoracic pain: a prospective outcome study with minimum 1-year follow up.慢性胸痛患者胸段内侧支阻滞治疗效果评估:一项至少随访1年的前瞻性结果研究
Pain Physician. 2006 Apr;9(2):97-105.
6
[Relevance of nerve blocks in treating and diagnosing low back pain--is the quality decisive?].[神经阻滞在治疗和诊断腰背痛中的相关性——质量起决定性作用吗?]
Schmerz. 2001 Dec;15(6):474-83. doi: 10.1007/s004820100035.
7
Assessment of Prevalence of Cervical Facet Joint Pain with Diagnostic Cervical Medial Branch Blocks: Analysis Based on Chronic Pain Model.评估诊断性颈椎内侧支阻滞对颈椎小关节突疼痛的患病率:基于慢性疼痛模型的分析。
Pain Physician. 2020 Nov;23(6):531-540.
8
Cervical medial branch blocks for chronic cervical facet joint pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with one-year follow-up.慢性颈椎小关节疼痛的颈椎内侧支阻滞:一项为期一年随访的随机、双盲、对照试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Aug 1;33(17):1813-20. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817b8f88.
9
Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the management of chronic low back pain: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: clinical trial NCT00355914.腰椎小关节神经阻滞治疗慢性下腰痛的评估:一项随机、双盲对照试验的初步报告:临床试验NCT00355914
Pain Physician. 2007 May;10(3):425-40.
10
Cost Utility Analysis of Cervical Therapeutic Medial Branch Blocks in Managing Chronic Neck Pain.颈椎治疗性内侧支阻滞治疗慢性颈痛的成本效用分析。
Int J Med Sci. 2017 Oct 15;14(13):1307-1316. doi: 10.7150/ijms.20755. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Outcomes After Lumbar Intra-Articular Facet Joint Injections and Medial Branch Blocks: A Scoping Review.腰椎关节突关节内关节注射和内侧支阻滞治疗结局的预测因素:范围综述。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Oct 15;48(20):1455-1463. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004776. Epub 2023 Jul 20.