Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro (PD), Italy.
Department of Biology, University of Padova, Via Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Environ Int. 2021 Jul;152:106484. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106484. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
There is growing concern for the wide use ofperfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) because of its toxic effects on the environment and on human health. A new compound - the so called C6O4 (perfluoro ([5-methoxy-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]oxy) acetic acid) - was recently introduced as one of the alternative to traditional PFOA, however this was done without any scientific evidence of the effects of C6O4 when dispersed into the environment. Recently, the Regional Agency for the Protection of the Environment of Veneto (Italy) detected high levels of C6O4 in groundwater and in the Po river, increasing the alarm for the potential effects of this chemical into the natural environment. The present study investigates for the first time the effects of C6O4 on the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum exposed to environmental realistic concentrations of C6O4 (0.1 µg/L and 1 µg/L) for 7 and 21 days. Furthermore, in order to better understand if C6O4 is a valid and less hazardous alternative to its substitute, microbial and transcriptomic alterations were also investigated in clams exposed to 1 µg/L ofPFOA. Results indicate that C6O4 may cause significant perturbations to the digestive gland microbiota, likely determining the impairment of host physiological homeostasis. Despite chemical analyses suggest a 5 times lower accumulation potential of C604 as compared to PFOA in clam soft tissues, transcriptional analyses reveal several alterations of gene expression profile. A large part of the altered pathways, including immune response, apoptosis regulation, nervous system development, lipid metabolism and cell membrane is the same in C6O4 and PFOA exposed clams. In addition, clams exposed to C6O4 showed dose-dependent responses as well as possible narcotic or neurotoxic effects and reduced activation of genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism. Overall, the present study suggests that the potential risks for marine organism following environmental contamination are not reduced by replacing PFOA with C6O4. In addition, the detection of both C6O4 and PFOA into tissues of clams inhabiting the Lagoon of Venice - where there are no point sources of either compounds - recommends a similar capacity to spread throughout the environment. These results prompt the urgent need to re-evaluate the use of C6O4 as it may represent not only an environmental hazard but also a potential risk for human health.
人们对全氟辛酸(PFOA)的广泛使用越来越担忧,因为它对环境和人类健康都有有毒影响。最近引入了一种新的化合物 - 所谓的 C6O4(全氟([5-甲氧基-1,3-二恶烷-4-基]氧基)乙酸) - 作为传统 PFOA 的替代品之一,然而,在没有任何关于 C6O4 分散到环境中时的影响的科学证据的情况下,就进行了这种引入。最近,意大利威尼托地区环境保护局(意大利)在地下水和波河(Po river)中检测到高水平的 C6O4,这增加了人们对这种化学物质对自然环境潜在影响的担忧。本研究首次调查了 C6O4 对暴露于环境现实浓度的 C6O4(0.1 µg/L 和 1 µg/L)的菲律宾蛤仔(Ruditapes philippinarum)的影响,暴露时间为 7 天和 21 天。此外,为了更好地理解 C6O4 是否是其替代品的一种有效且危害较小的替代品,还研究了暴露于 1 µg/L 的 PFOA 的蛤仔中的微生物和转录组变化。结果表明,C6O4 可能会对消化腺微生物群产生重大干扰,可能导致宿主生理平衡受损。尽管化学分析表明 C604 在蛤仔软组织中的积累潜力比 PFOA 低 5 倍,但转录分析显示基因表达谱发生了多种改变。在 C6O4 和 PFOA 暴露的蛤仔中,改变的途径很大一部分是相同的,包括免疫反应、细胞凋亡调节、神经系统发育、脂质代谢和细胞膜。此外,暴露于 C6O4 的蛤仔表现出剂量依赖性反应以及可能的麻醉或神经毒性作用,并减少了参与外来化合物代谢的基因的激活。总的来说,本研究表明,用 C6O4 替代 PFOA 并不能降低海洋生物因环境污染而面临的潜在风险。此外,在威尼斯泻湖(那里没有这两种化合物的任何点源)的蛤仔组织中检测到 C6O4 和 PFOA,表明它们有类似的在环境中扩散的能力。这些结果促使人们迫切需要重新评估 C6O4 的使用,因为它不仅可能代表环境危害,而且还可能对人类健康构成潜在风险。