• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study.控制性卵巢刺激不应优先用于宫腔内人工授精治疗的男性不育症:一项回顾性研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Mar 19;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3.
2
Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus clomiphene citrate in subfertile couples treated with intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量人绝经期促性腺激素与枸橼酸氯米酚在宫腔内人工授精治疗不孕夫妇中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1079-88. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev062. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
3
Predictors of pregnancy and live-birth in couples with unexplained infertility after ovarian stimulation-intrauterine insemination.卵巢刺激-宫腔内人工授精后不明原因不孕夫妇妊娠和活产的预测因素
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jun;105(6):1575-1583.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Ovarian stimulation in infertile women treated with the use of intrauterine insemination: a cohort study from China.宫腔内人工授精治疗不孕女性的卵巢刺激:来自中国的队列研究。
Fertil Steril. 2018 May;109(5):872-878. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.008.
5
Does ovarian stimulation benefit ovulatory women undergoing therapeutic donor insemination?促排卵对接受治疗性供精人工授精的排卵女性有益吗?
Fertil Steril. 2021 Mar;115(3):638-645. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1430. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Conversion of in vitro fertilization cycles to intrauterine inseminations in patients with a poor ovarian response: Risk of multiple pregnancies.将卵巢反应不良患者的体外受精周期转换为宫腔内人工授精:多胎妊娠的风险。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct;49(8):101831. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101831. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Pregnancy outcomes of intrauterine insemination without ovarian stimulation in couples affected by unilateral tubal occlusion and male infertility.单侧输卵管阻塞合并男性不育患者行未促排卵宫腔内人工授精的妊娠结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 24;23(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05705-3.
8
Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?试管婴儿服务有两种不同方式——比控制性卵巢过度刺激下的宫腔内人工授精更具成本效益吗?
Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2331-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev193. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
9
Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation.低剂量人绝经期促性腺激素与自然周期在宫内授精治疗月经规律的不孕夫妇中的应用比较。
J Ovarian Res. 2020 Apr 4;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00638-3.
10
Intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation is a successful step prior to assisted reproductive technology for couples with unexplained infertility.对于不明原因不孕的夫妇,宫内人工授精联合卵巢刺激是辅助生殖技术之前的一个成功步骤。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Apr;42(3):472-477. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1916805. Epub 2021 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Pregnancy outcomes of intrauterine insemination without ovarian stimulation in couples affected by unilateral tubal occlusion and male infertility.单侧输卵管阻塞合并男性不育患者行未促排卵宫腔内人工授精的妊娠结局。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 24;23(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05705-3.
2
Factors Affecting Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Outcome.影响人工授精妊娠结局的因素。
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jul 27;14:3961-3969. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S312766. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Mature Follicle Count and Multiple Gestation Risk Based on Patient Age in Intrauterine Insemination Cycles With Ovarian Stimulation.基于卵巢刺激的宫腔内人工授精周期中患者年龄的成熟卵泡计数和多胎妊娠风险。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):1005-1014. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003795.
2
Gonadotropins versus oral ovarian stimulation agents for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.促性腺激素与口服卵巢刺激药物治疗不明原因不孕的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Feb;113(2):417-425.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.042. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Infertility Workup for the Women's Health Specialist: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 781.女性健康专家的不孕评估:ACOG 委员会意见,编号 781。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;133(6):e377-e384. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003271.
4
Does intra-uterine insemination have a place in modern ART practice?宫腔内人工授精在现代辅助生殖技术实践中有一席之地吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;53:3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
5
Ovarian stimulation in infertile women treated with the use of intrauterine insemination: a cohort study from China.宫腔内人工授精治疗不孕女性的卵巢刺激:来自中国的队列研究。
Fertil Steril. 2018 May;109(5):872-878. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.008.
6
The impact of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of intrauterine insemination treatment: an analysis of 8893 cycles.卵巢刺激对宫腔内人工授精治疗结局的影响:8893 个周期分析。
BJOG. 2016 Sep;123 Suppl 3:70-5. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14020.
7
Assisted reproductive technologies for male subfertility.针对男性生育力低下的辅助生殖技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 26;2(2):CD000360. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000360.pub5.
8
A unique view on male infertility around the globe.对全球男性不育症的独特见解。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Apr 26;13:37. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1.
9
Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion.男性不育的诊断评估:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Mar;103(3):e18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.103. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
10
Indications of intrauterine insemination for male and non-male factor infertility.宫腔内人工授精治疗男性因素及非男性因素不孕症的适应证。
Semin Reprod Med. 2014 Jul;32(4):306-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375183. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

控制性卵巢刺激不应优先用于宫腔内人工授精治疗的男性不育症:一项回顾性研究。

Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, No. 2, Sunwen East Road, Shiqi District, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Mar 19;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3
PMID:33740990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7977560/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some studies have stated that intrauterine insemination (IUI) with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might increase the pregnancy rate, while others suggest that IUI in the natural cycle (NC) should be the first line of treatment. It remains unclear whether it is necessary to use COS at the same time when IUI is applied to treat isolated male factor infertility. Thus, we aimed to investigate efficacy of IUI with COS for isolated male factor infertility.

METHODS

A total of 601 IUI cycles from 307 couples who sought medical care for isolated male factor infertility between January 2010 and February 2020 were divided into two groups: NC-IUI and COS-IUI. The COS-IUI group was further divided into two subgroups according to the number of pre-ovulatory follicles on the day of HCG: cycles with monofollicular development (one follicle group) and cycles with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles (≥ 2 follicles group). The IUI outcomes, including clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, and multiple pregnancy rates were compared.

RESULTS

The clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, and ectopic pregnancy rates were comparable between the NC-IUI and COS-IUI group. Similar results were also observed among the NC-IUI, one follicle, and ≥ 2 follicles groups. However, with respect to the multiple pregnancy rate, a trend toward higher multiple pregnancy rate was observed in the COS-IUI group compared to the NC-IUI group (8.7% vs. 0, P = 0.091), and a significant difference was found between the NC-IUI and ≥ 2 follicles group (0 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

In COS cycles, especially in those with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles, the multiple pregnancy rate increased without a substantial gain in overall pregnancy rate; thus, COS should not be preferred in IUI for isolated male factor infertility. If COS is required, one stimulated follicle and one healthy baby should be the goal considering the safety of both mothers and foetuses.

摘要

背景

一些研究表明,宫腔内人工授精(IUI)联合控制性卵巢刺激(COS)可能会提高妊娠率,而另一些研究则认为自然周期 IUI(NC-IUI)应该是一线治疗方法。目前仍不清楚在治疗单纯男性因素不育症时,是否有必要同时进行 COS。因此,我们旨在探讨 COS 在治疗单纯男性因素不育症中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月因单纯男性因素不育就诊的 307 对夫妇的 601 个 IUI 周期,将其分为两组:NC-IUI 和 COS-IUI。COS-IUI 组根据 HCG 日子宫内单个优势卵泡(1 卵泡组)和至少 2 个优势卵泡(≥2 卵泡组)的数量进一步分为两组。比较两组的 IUI 结局,包括临床妊娠率、活产率、自然流产率、异位妊娠率和多胎妊娠率。

结果

NC-IUI 组和 COS-IUI 组的临床妊娠率、活产率、自然流产率和异位妊娠率相似。NC-IUI 组、1 卵泡组和≥2 卵泡组的结果也相似。然而,就多胎妊娠率而言,COS-IUI 组的多胎妊娠率呈上升趋势,与 NC-IUI 组相比差异有统计学意义(8.7%比 0,P=0.091),与≥2 卵泡组相比差异有统计学意义(0 比 16.7%,P=0.033)。

结论

在 COS 周期中,尤其是至少有 2 个优势卵泡的周期中,多胎妊娠率增加,而总妊娠率无明显增加;因此,在治疗单纯男性因素不育症时,不应首选 COS。如果需要进行 COS,应考虑母亲和胎儿的安全,以获得一个刺激的卵泡和一个健康的婴儿为目标。