• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

游离前臂皮瓣供区采用断层皮片或羊膜覆盖的前瞻性随机临床研究。

Closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site with split-thickness skin graft or amniotic membrane: A prospective randomized clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Johannes Kepler University, 4020, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 May;49(5):403-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.015
PMID:33741237
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical, aesthetic, and functional outcomes between amniotic membrane (test group) and split-thickness skin grafts (control group) used for radial forearm free flap defect closure. The primary outcome measurement for both groups was assessment of the defect closure healing process. In addition, aesthetic (Vancouver Scar Scale) and functional outcomes (skin sensitivity, hand/wrist functionality, grip strength) were evaluated. Fifty eligible patients with radial forearm free flap donor site defects were randomly assigned to two groups receiving either amniotic membrane (test group; n = 25) or split-thickness skin graft (control group; n = 25) for defect covering. Forty-seven of the 50 patients (n = 47) were able to be followed up for 6 months and showed a significantly longer healing process (p < 0.001) with amniotic membrane (64.5 ± 38.4 days; n = 24) than with split-thickness skin grafts (29.2 ± 8.9 days; n = 23); however, there were no differences in the prevalence of healing defects/dehiscence and/or wound infections. Forty-two of the 47 patients (21 in each group) were able to be continually followed up for 12 months, and showed no differences in terms of clinical outcome as well as the subjective and objective aesthetic and functional results evaluated. With regard to the clinical, aesthetic, and functional outcomes evaluated for radial forearm free flap defects, coverage with amniotic membrane offers an excellent alternative treatment approach, avoiding secondary induced donor site morbidity.

摘要

本研究旨在比较羊膜(试验组)和断层皮片(对照组)用于覆盖游离前臂皮瓣缺损的临床、美学和功能结果。两组的主要结局测量均为评估缺损愈合过程。此外,还评估了美学(温哥华瘢痕量表)和功能结果(皮肤敏感性、手/腕功能、握力)。50 名游离前臂皮瓣供区缺损患者符合条件,随机分为两组,分别接受羊膜(试验组;n=25)或断层皮片(对照组;n=25)覆盖缺损。50 名患者中有 47 名(n=47)能够随访 6 个月,显示羊膜(愈合时间 64.5±38.4 天;n=24)的愈合过程明显长于断层皮片(愈合时间 29.2±8.9 天;n=23;p<0.001);然而,愈合缺陷/裂开和/或伤口感染的发生率没有差异。47 名患者中有 42 名(每组 21 名)能够持续随访 12 个月,在临床结果以及评估的主观和客观美学和功能结果方面没有差异。对于游离前臂皮瓣缺损的临床、美学和功能结果,羊膜覆盖提供了一种极好的替代治疗方法,避免了继发性供区发病率。

相似文献

1
Closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site with split-thickness skin graft or amniotic membrane: A prospective randomized clinical study.游离前臂皮瓣供区采用断层皮片或羊膜覆盖的前瞻性随机临床研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 May;49(5):403-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.015. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
2
Use of amniotic membrane for radial forearm free flap donor site coverage: clinical, functional and cosmetic outcomes.应用羊膜覆盖游离前臂皮瓣供区:临床、功能和美容效果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2433-2443. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03104-7. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Full-thickness skin graft versus split-thickness skin graft for radial forearm free flap donor site closure: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.全厚皮片移植与断层皮片移植修复前臂游离皮瓣供区的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 26;13(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02471-x.
4
Donor site morbidity following radial forearm free flap reconstruction with split thickness skin grafts using negative pressure wound therapy.游离前臂皮瓣重建术后使用负压伤口治疗技术行断层皮片移植供区并发症。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 May 21;48(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0344-9.
5
Radial forearm free flap donor site morbidity: ulnar-based transposition flap vs split-thickness skin graft.桡侧前臂游离皮瓣供区并发症:尺侧蒂移位皮瓣与中厚皮片移植的比较
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jan;138(1):38-43. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.216.
6
Retrospective comparison of split-thickness skin graft versus local full-thickness skin graft coverage of radial forearm free flap donor site.回顾性比较断层皮片移植与局部全厚皮片移植修复前臂游离皮瓣供区。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Aug;50(8):664-670. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.06.010. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
7
Reconstructing Forearm Free Flap Donor Sites Using Full-Thickness Skin Grafts Harvested from the Ipsilateral Arm.采用同侧手臂全厚皮片游离移植修复前臂皮瓣供区。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar;162(3):277-282. doi: 10.1177/0194599819901124. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
Functional and cosmetic donor site morbidity of the radial forearm-free flap: comparison of two different coverage techniques.桡侧游离前臂皮瓣供区的功能和美容相关并发症:两种不同覆盖技术的比较
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;275(5):1219-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4908-5. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Comparison of split thickness skin graft versus full thickness skin graft for radial forearm flap donor site closure: A systematic review and Meta-analysis.用于桡侧前臂皮瓣供区闭合的中厚皮片移植与全厚皮片移植的比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 Mar-Apr;45(2):104156. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.104156. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
10
Biomechanical and aesthetic outcomes following radial forearm free flap transfer: comparison of ipsilateral full-thickness skin graft and traditional split-thickness skin graft.桡侧前臂游离皮瓣移植后的生物力学和美学效果:同侧全厚皮片移植与传统断层皮片移植的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Feb;53(2):109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.04.003. Epub 2023 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of allogeneic placental tissues in penile inversion vaginoplasty.同种异体胎盘组织在阴茎内翻阴道成形术中的作用。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 May 31;13(5):736-747. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-420. Epub 2024 May 28.