Zhang Zhe-Chao, Yang Jiu-Yang, Hao Bai-Hui, Hao Li-Jun, Luo Jun-Qing, Li Xue, Diao Feng-Wei, Zhang Jing-Xia, Guo Wei
Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Waste Resource Recycle, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecology, School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Apr 8;42(4):2066-2079. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202008154.
Sandy soils are considered as a significant transition phase to desertification. The effective recovery of sandy soils is of great significance to mitigate the desertification process. Some studies have shown that arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and biochar improved the sandy soil, but there have been very few studies regarding the combined effects of AM fungi and biochar amendments on sandy soil improvement. Additionally, the roles of the bacterial and fungal community during the process of sandy soil improvement remain unclear. A greenhouse pot experiment with four treatments, including a control (CK, no amendment), single AM fungi-assisted amendment (RI), single biochar amendment (BC), and combined amendment (BC_RI, biochar plus AM fungi), was set up. This study investigated the effects of different amendment methods on the mycorrhizal colonization, biomass, nutrient (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) content, soil organic carbon, soil nutrient (TN, TP, and TK) content, and soil water-stable aggregate composition. High throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the roles of the bacterial and fungal communities during the process of sandy soil improvement. Combined with multiple analysis methods, the improvement mechanisms of different amendment methods were explored. The aim was to provide basic data and scientific basics for reasonably and effectively improving sandy soils. The results indicated that a significant mycorrhiza colonization was observed in the inoculation (RI and BC_RI) treatments, but there was no substantial difference in the mycorrhiza colonization with the RI and BC_RI. Compared with the CK, the shoot biomass and shoot element (N, K, Ca, and Mg) contents were significantly increased in the RI, and the shoot element (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) contents were significantly increased in the BC and BC_RI; compared with the RI and BC, the root biomass and the root element (P, K, Ca, and Mg) contents were significantly increased in the BC_RI. Compared with the CK, the soil organic carbon contents were significantly increased in the BC and BC_RI, the soil TN contents were significantly increased by 152.54%, and the soil TP and TK contents were significantly decreased by 12.5% and 18.8%, respectively. The proportion of soil aggregates with particle sizes of 0.25-0.05 mm was the highest in each treatment, and the large particle size (>0.25 mm) soil aggregate was significantly increased in the BC_RI. Compared with the CK, the Sobs and Shannon indices of the bacterial/fungal community were significantly decreased in the RI and BC_RI. There was a difference in the microbial community compositions and abundance in the various treatments. The results of the RDA and network analysis were as follows:the effects of AM fungi, biochar, and combined amendment on the soil environment and microbial community structure were significant; in the different amendment treatments, the relationship of the microbial molecular ecological network was significantly changed, and the composition of the core species varied; compared with the RI, there was a higher network connection degree and a richer core species composition in the BC and BC_RI; moreover, the essential role of was weaken and the core roles of the other microorganisms (especially bacterial species) were enhanced under the combined effects of biochar and AM fungi. The SEM results demonstrated that the application of AM fungi and biochar could directly affect the bacteria/fungi community structure, and further affect the plant growth and soil properties. The differences in the microbial community structure (especially the change in the microbial interaction) were the key driving factors that led to the difference in the soil improvement effectiveness. In summary, the effects of the different amendment methods on the improvement effectiveness of sandy soils varied. The microbial community played key roles in the process of sandy soil improvement, and there were potential advantages and applications in accelerating the ecological restoration of sandy soils under the combined AM fungi and biochar amendment.
砂质土壤被认为是沙漠化的一个重要过渡阶段。有效恢复砂质土壤对于减缓沙漠化进程具有重要意义。一些研究表明,丛枝菌根(AM)真菌和生物炭可改善砂质土壤,但关于AM真菌和生物炭改良剂对砂质土壤改良的联合作用的研究却很少。此外,在砂质土壤改良过程中细菌和真菌群落的作用仍不清楚。为此设置了一个温室盆栽试验,包括四种处理:对照(CK,不改良)、单一AM真菌辅助改良(RI)、单一生物炭改良(BC)和联合改良(BC_RI,生物炭加AM真菌)。本研究调查了不同改良方法对菌根定殖、生物量、养分(氮、磷、钾、钙和镁)含量、土壤有机碳、土壤养分(全氮、全磷和全钾)含量以及土壤水稳性团聚体组成的影响。利用高通量测序技术研究了细菌和真菌群落在砂质土壤改良过程中的作用。结合多种分析方法,探讨了不同改良方法的改良机制。目的是为合理有效地改良砂质土壤提供基础数据和科学依据。结果表明,接种(RI和BC_RI)处理中观察到显著的菌根定殖,但RI和BC_RI之间的菌根定殖没有实质性差异。与CK相比,RI处理中地上部生物量和地上部元素(氮、钾、钙和镁)含量显著增加,BC和BC_RI处理中地上部元素(氮、磷、钾、钙和镁)含量显著增加;与RI和BC相比,BC_RI处理中根系生物量和根系元素(磷、钾、钙和镁)含量显著增加。与CK相比,BC和BC_RI处理中土壤有机碳含量显著增加,土壤全氮含量显著增加152.54%,土壤全磷和全钾含量分别显著降低12.5%和18.8%。各处理中粒径为0.25 - 0.05 mm的土壤团聚体比例最高,BC_RI处理中粒径较大(>0.25 mm)的土壤团聚体显著增加。与CK相比,RI和BC_RI处理中细菌/真菌群落的Sobs和Shannon指数显著降低。不同处理中微生物群落组成和丰度存在差异。冗余分析(RDA)和网络分析结果如下:AM真菌、生物炭和联合改良对土壤环境和微生物群落结构的影响显著;在不同改良处理中,微生物分子生态网络的关系发生显著变化,核心物种组成不同;与RI相比,BC和BC_RI处理中网络连接度更高,核心物种组成更丰富;此外,在生物炭和AM真菌的联合作用下, 的重要作用减弱,其他微生物(尤其是细菌物种)的核心作用增强。结构方程模型(SEM)结果表明,AM真菌和生物炭的应用可直接影响细菌/真菌群落结构,进而影响植物生长和土壤性质。微生物群落结构的差异(尤其是微生物相互作用的变化)是导致土壤改良效果差异的关键驱动因素。综上所述,不同改良方法对砂质土壤改良效果的影响各不相同。微生物群落在砂质土壤改良过程中发挥着关键作用,在AM真菌和生物炭联合改良下加速砂质土壤生态恢复具有潜在优势和应用前景。