Less polyethylene wear in monobloc compared to modular ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene inlays in hybrid total knee arthroplasty: A 5-year randomized radiostereometry study.

BACKGROUND

A modular polyethylene (PE) inlay in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may wear on both sides. PE particles may induce osteolysis, which can lead to implant loosening. The aim of this study was to determine if PE wear in monobloc TKA differs from that ofmodular TKA at 60-month follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective, patient-blinded trial, 50 patients were randomized to hybrid TKA surgery with either acementless high-porosity trabecular-metal tibial component with a monobloc UHMWPE inlay (MONO-TM) or a cementless low-porosity screw-augmented titanium fiber-mesh tibial component with a modular UHMWPE inlay (MODULAR-FM). Radiostereometry was used to measure PE wear and tibial component migration.

RESULTS

At 60-monthfollow-up, mean PE wear of the medial compartment was 0.24 mm and 0.61 mm and mean PE wear of the lateral compartment was 0.31 mm and 0.82 mm for the MONO-TM and the MODULAR-FM groups, respectively (p < 0.01). The PE wear-rate was 0.05 mm (95% CI 0.03-0.08) in the MONO-TM group and 0.14 mm (95% CI 0.12-0.17) in the MODULAR-FM group (p < 0.01). Total translation at 60 months was mean 0.30 mm (95% CI 0.10-0.51) less (p < 0.01) for MONO-TM compared with MODULAR-FM tibial components. The majority of tibial components were stable (<0.2 mm MTPM) from 12 to 24-month and 24 to 60-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

At mid-term follow-up, monobloc PE inlay wear was approximately 40% of that of the modular PE inlay wear, which suggest that back-side wear of modular PE inlays is a significant contributor of PE wear in hybrid TKA.