• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项针对癌症患者围手术期护理的大型国际随机对照试验中,招募模式。

Recruitment patterns in a large international randomized controlled trial of perioperative care in cancer patients.

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Centre of Evidence-Based Orthopaedics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Trials. 2021 Mar 20;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05149-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05149-0
PMID:33743753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7981833/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) randomized controlled trial (RCT) was the first study to prospectively enroll and randomize orthopedic oncology patients in multiple centers internationally. The objective of this study was to describe recruitment patterns, to examine the differences in enrollment across different PARITY sites, and to identify variables associated with differing levels of recruitment.

METHODS

Data from this study was obtained from the PARITY trial Methods Center and records of correspondence between the Methods Center and recruiting sites. We performed descriptive statistics to report the recruitment patterns over time. We compared recruitment, time to set up, and time to enroll the first patient between North American and international sites, private and public healthcare models, and the presence or absence of research personnel. Two-tailed non-paired t tests were performed to test average monthly recruitment rates between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 602 patients from 36 North American and 12 international sites were recruited from 2013 to 2019. North American sites were able to become fully enrollment-ready at an average of 19.5 months and international sites at an average of 27 months. Once enrolling, international sites were able to enroll 0.59 patients per/month whereas North American sites averaged a monthly recruitment rate of 0.2 patients/month once enrolling. Sites with research personnel reached enrollment-ready status at an average of 19.3 months and sites without research support at an average of 30.3 months. Once enrolling, the recruitment rate was 0.28 patients/month and 0.2 patients per month for sites with and without research support, respectively. Publicly funded sites had a monthly enrollment of 0.4 patients/month whereas privately funded sites had a monthly enrollment rate of 0.17 patients/month.

CONCLUSIONS

As a collaborative group, the PARITY investigators increased the pace of recruitment throughout the trial, likely by increasing the number of active sites. The longer time to start-up at international sites may be due to the complex governing regulations of pharmaceutical trials. Nevertheless, international sites should be considered essential as they recruited significantly more patients per month once active. The absence of research support personnel may lead to delays in the time to start-up. The results of the current study will provide guidance for choosing which sites to recruit for participation in future collaborative clinical trials in orthopedic oncology and other surgical specialties.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01479283 . Prospectively registered on November 24, 2011.

摘要

简介

肿瘤外科预防性抗生素方案(PARITY)随机对照试验(RCT)是第一项前瞻性招募和随机分组的多中心国际骨科肿瘤学患者的研究。本研究的目的是描述招募模式,检查不同 PARITY 站点之间的入组差异,并确定与不同招募水平相关的变量。

方法

本研究的数据来自 PARITY 试验方法中心和方法中心与招募站点之间的通信记录。我们进行了描述性统计,以报告随时间推移的招募模式。我们比较了北美和国际站点、私人和公共医疗保健模式以及是否有研究人员之间的招募、建立时间和招募第一个患者的时间。采用双尾非配对 t 检验比较组间平均每月招募率。

结果

2013 年至 2019 年期间,从 36 个北美和 12 个国际站点共招募了 602 名患者。北美站点平均 19.5 个月达到完全入组准备状态,国际站点平均 27 个月达到入组准备状态。一旦入组,国际站点每月可入组 0.59 名患者,而北美站点每月平均入组 0.2 名患者。有研究人员的站点平均 19.3 个月达到入组准备状态,无研究支持的站点平均 30.3 个月达到入组准备状态。一旦入组,有研究支持的站点招募率为 0.28 名患者/月,无研究支持的站点为 0.2 名患者/月。有公共资金支持的站点每月入组 0.4 名患者,而私人资金支持的站点每月入组率为 0.17 名患者。

结论

作为一个协作组,PARITY 研究人员在整个试验过程中加快了招募速度,可能是通过增加活跃站点的数量。国际站点启动时间较长可能是由于药物试验的复杂监管法规所致。然而,国际站点应该被认为是必不可少的,因为它们一旦开始活动,每月招募的患者数量明显更多。缺乏研究支持人员可能导致启动时间延迟。本研究的结果将为选择哪些站点招募参加未来骨科肿瘤学和其他外科专业的合作临床试验提供指导。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01479283。于 2011 年 11 月 24 日前瞻性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce19/7981833/b06f2aef866a/13063_2021_5149_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce19/7981833/9fb6da40cb0d/13063_2021_5149_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce19/7981833/b06f2aef866a/13063_2021_5149_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce19/7981833/9fb6da40cb0d/13063_2021_5149_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce19/7981833/b06f2aef866a/13063_2021_5149_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Recruitment patterns in a large international randomized controlled trial of perioperative care in cancer patients.在一项针对癌症患者围手术期护理的大型国际随机对照试验中,招募模式。
Trials. 2021 Mar 20;22(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05149-0.
2
Clinical Trial Educator program - a novel approach to accelerate enrollment in a phase III International Acute Coronary Syndrome Trial.临床试验教育者计划——一种加速 III 期国际急性冠脉综合征试验入组的新方法。
Clin Trials. 2012 Jun;9(3):358-66. doi: 10.1177/1740774512440760. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
3
Factors Associated With Time to Site Activation, Randomization, and Enrollment Performance in a Stroke Prevention Trial.一项中风预防试验中与部位激活时间、随机分组及入组表现相关的因素
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2511-2518. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016976. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens In Tumor Surgery (PARITY): a multi-center randomized controlled study comparing alternative antibiotic regimens in patients undergoing tumor resections with endoprosthetic replacements-a statistical analysis plan.肿瘤外科预防性抗生素方案(PARITY):一项多中心随机对照研究,比较接受肿瘤切除和内置假体置换术患者的替代抗生素方案——统计分析计划。
Trials. 2021 Mar 22;22(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05147-2.
5
Recruitment strategies for predominantly low-income, multi-racial/ethnic children and parents to 3-year community-based intervention trials: Childhood Obesity Prevention and Treatment Research (COPTR) Consortium.主要针对低收入、多种族/族裔儿童和家长的招募策略,以开展为期 3 年的社区为基础的干预试验:儿童肥胖预防和治疗研究(COPTR)联盟。
Trials. 2019 May 28;20(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3418-0.
6
Behavioural activation therapy for post-stroke depression: the BEADS feasibility RCT.行为激活疗法治疗脑卒中后抑郁:BEADS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(47):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23470.
7
Characteristics Associated With Participation in a Behavioral Weight Loss Randomized Control Trial in the U.S. Military.与参与美国军队行为减肥随机对照试验相关的特征
Mil Med. 2019 Mar 1;184(3-4):e120-e126. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy199.
8
'The trial is owned by the team, not by an individual': a qualitative study exploring the role of teamwork in recruitment to randomised controlled trials in surgical oncology.“试验由团队主导,而非个人”:一项定性研究,探讨团队合作在外科肿瘤学随机对照试验招募工作中的作用
Trials. 2016 Apr 26;17(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1341-1.
9
UK FASHIoN: feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for hip impingement compared with best conservative care.英国时尚:髋关节撞击症关节镜手术与最佳保守治疗随机对照试验的可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(32):1-172. doi: 10.3310/hta20320.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Factors That Impact Hospital-Specific Enrollment Rates for a Neonatal Clinical Trial: An Analysis of the HEAL Study.影响新生儿临床试验医院特定入组率的因素:HEAL 研究分析。
Ethics Hum Res. 2023 Jan;45(1):29-38. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500154.
2
Assessment of Risk of Bias in Osteosarcoma and Ewing's Sarcoma Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.骨肉瘤和尤因肉瘤随机对照试验的偏倚风险评估:一项系统评价
Curr Oncol. 2021 Sep 28;28(5):3771-3794. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28050322.

本文引用的文献

1
Enrollment challenges in multicenter, international studies: The example of the GAS trial.多中心国际研究中的入组挑战:以全球气道研究(GAS)试验为例
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Jan;29(1):51-58. doi: 10.1111/pan.13522. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
2
Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.与失败的临床试验相关的因素及提高成功可能性的机会:一项综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 7;11:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Discontinuation of surgical versus nonsurgical clinical trials: an analysis of 88,498 trials.
外科与非外科临床试验的终止:对88498项试验的分析
J Surg Res. 2018 Jul;227:151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.039. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
4
A checklist for clinical trials in rare disease: obstacles and anticipatory actions-lessons learned from the FOR-DMD trial.罕见病临床试验清单:障碍与前瞻性行动——从杜氏肌营养不良症(FOR-DMD)试验中汲取的经验教训
Trials. 2018 May 10;19(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2645-0.
5
Barriers to Clinical Trial Enrollment in Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Cancer.癌症种族和少数民族患者临床试验入组的障碍
Cancer Control. 2016 Oct;23(4):327-337. doi: 10.1177/107327481602300404.
6
Challenges in recruitment and retention of clinical trial subjects.招募和留住临床试验受试者面临的挑战。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):137-43. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184820.
7
Has the Level of Evidence of Podium Presentations at the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Annual Meeting Changed Over Time?肌肉骨骼肿瘤学会年会 podium 展示的证据水平随时间有变化吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4763-x.
8
Is There Truly "No Significant Difference"? Underpowered Randomized Controlled Trials in the Orthopaedic Literature.真的“无显著差异”吗?骨科文献中效能不足的随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 16;97(24):2068-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00012.
9
Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in tumour surgery (PARITY): a pilot multicentre randomised controlled trial.肿瘤手术预防性抗生素方案(PARITY):一项多中心随机对照试验的初步研究
Bone Joint Res. 2015 Sep;4(9):154-62. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.49.2000482.
10
Completion and Publication Rates of Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgery: An Empirical Study.手术随机对照试验的完成率和发表率:一项实证研究。
Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):68-73. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000810.