Department of Sustainable Land Management & Soil Research Centre, School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of Reading, Whiteknights, RG6 6AR, UK.
Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Poole, Dorset BH12 5BB, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 20;779:146260. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146260. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
Essential and non-essential trace metals are capable of causing toxicity to organisms above a threshold concentration. Extensive research has assessed the behaviour of trace metals in biological and ecological systems, but has typically focused on single organisms within a trophic level and not on multi-trophic transfer through terrestrial food chains. This reinforces the notion of metal toxicity as a closed system, failing to consider one trophic level as a pollution source to another; therefore, obscuring the full extent of ecosystem effects. Given the relatively few studies on trophic transfer of metals, this review has taken a compartment-based approach, where transfer of metals through trophic pathways is considered as a series of linked compartments (soil-plant-arthropod herbivore-arthropod predator). In particular, we consider the mechanisms by which trace metals are taken up by organisms, the forms and transformations that can occur within the organism and the consequences for trace metal availability to the next trophic level. The review focuses on four of the most prevalent metal cations in soil which are labile in terrestrial food chains: Cd, Cu, Zn and Ni. Current knowledge of the processes and mechanisms by which these metals are transformed and moved within and between trophic levels in the soil-plant-arthropod system are evaluated. We demonstrate that the key factors controlling the transfer of trace metals through the soil-plant-arthropod system are the form and location in which the metal occurs in the lower trophic level and the physiological mechanisms of each organism in regulating uptake, transformation, detoxification and transfer. The magnitude of transfer varies considerably depending on the trace metal concerned, as does its toxicity, and we conclude that biomagnification is not a general property of plant-arthropod and arthropod-arthropod systems. To deliver a more holistic assessment of ecosystem toxicity, integrated studies across ecosystem compartments are needed to identify critical pathways that can result in secondary toxicity across terrestrial food-chains.
必需和非必需微量元素在超过阈值浓度时会对生物体造成毒性。大量研究评估了痕量金属在生物和生态系统中的行为,但通常集中在单个营养级别的单个生物上,而没有考虑通过陆地食物链进行的多营养级转移。这强化了金属毒性作为一个封闭系统的概念,没有考虑一个营养级是另一个营养级的污染源;因此,掩盖了生态系统影响的全部范围。鉴于关于金属营养级转移的研究相对较少,本综述采用了基于隔室的方法,其中通过营养途径转移金属被视为一系列连接的隔室(土壤-植物-节肢动物-草食性节肢动物-肉食性节肢动物)。特别是,我们考虑了痕量金属被生物体吸收的机制、在生物体内部可能发生的形态和转化,以及痕量金属对下一个营养级的可用性的后果。该综述重点关注土壤中四种最普遍的可移动金属阳离子:Cd、Cu、Zn 和 Ni。当前,评估了这些金属在土壤-植物-节肢动物系统中在营养级之间和内部转化和移动的过程和机制的知识。我们表明,控制痕量金属通过土壤-植物-节肢动物系统转移的关键因素是金属在较低营养级中出现的形态和位置,以及每个生物体在调节吸收、转化、解毒和转移方面的生理机制。转移的幅度因痕量金属的种类和毒性而异,我们得出的结论是,生物放大不是植物-节肢动物和节肢动物-节肢动物系统的普遍特性。为了对生态系统毒性进行更全面的评估,需要进行跨越生态系统隔室的综合研究,以确定可能导致陆地食物链中二次毒性的关键途径。