Suppr超能文献

院内和院外急性脑卒中患者地面与空中转运的总转运时间。

Total Transfer Time for Ground vs. Air Transport for Interhospital and Scene Transfers of Acute Stroke Patients.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.

Vanderbilt Cerebrovascular Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37027, United States.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Jun;30(6):105704. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105704. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Stroke patients are frequently transported to a comprehensive stroke center for treatment, either from a regional hospital via interhospital transfer or from the field via direct-from-scene transfer, by air or ground transportation. We sought to determine whether air or ground transport was faster in both transfer circumstances.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients transferred to a single comprehensive stroke center for stroke treatment was conducted. EMS and medical records were used to evaluate the time and distance of transfer and functional outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 205 transfers, 47 were interhospital transfers by air (22.9%), 68 were interhospital transfers by ground (33.2%), 40 were scene transfers by air (19.5%), and 50 were scene transfers by ground (24.4%). Ground transfers had shorter alarm to EMS departure times (30 min. vs 40 min.; p<0.0001). Air transfers had shorter EMS departure to arrival times when normalized by transfer distance indicating a faster travel velocity. Interhospital transfers by air were predicted to be faster than ground over 40 miles, and scene transfers by air were predicted to be faster than ground over 28 miles. Transfer mode had no significant effect on functional outcome when controlling for tPA, thrombectomy, and NIH Stroke Scale in this small study.

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer efficiency for stroke patients depends on logistics prior to EMS arrival as well as the speed of travel. While air transport clearly results in faster travel velocity, total interhospital transfer times are faster for air transportation only when traveling more than 40 miles.

摘要

目的

脑卒中患者经常被送往综合性卒中中心接受治疗,通过院际间转院或现场直接转运,通过空中或地面运输。我们旨在确定在这两种转运情况下,空中或地面转运哪种更快。

材料与方法

对 205 名被送往单一综合性卒中中心接受卒中治疗的患者进行了回顾性研究。利用紧急医疗服务(EMS)和医疗记录评估了转运的时间和距离以及功能结局。

结果

在 205 次转运中,47 次为空中院际转运(22.9%),68 次为地面院际转运(33.2%),40 次为现场空中转运(19.5%),50 次为现场地面转运(24.4%)。地面转运的报警到 EMS 出发时间更短(30 分钟 vs 40 分钟;p<0.0001)。当通过转运距离对 EMS 出发到到达时间进行归一化时,空中转运的速度更快,表明其旅行速度更快。在本小样本研究中,当控制 tPA、血栓切除术和 NIH 卒中量表时,预测距离超过 40 英里时,空中院际转运将比地面转运更快,而距离超过 28 英里时,现场空中转运将比地面转运更快。在控制 tPA、血栓切除术和 NIH 卒中量表的情况下,在本小样本研究中,转运方式对功能结局没有显著影响。

结论

脑卒中患者的转运效率取决于 EMS 到达前的物流情况以及运输速度。虽然空中运输显然会导致更快的旅行速度,但只有在转运距离超过 40 英里时,空中运输的总院际转运时间才会更快。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验