Comparison of 5-year safety and efficacy of laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab injection in retinopathy of prematurity.

PURPOSE

To compare laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

METHODS

The study included 52 eyes of 26 patients after ROP treatment who were observed up to 5 years of age. Twenty-eight eyes received laser photocoagulation as the initial treatment (laser group), and twenty-four eyes underwent IVB (IVB group). We collected data on gestational age, birth weight, 1- and 5-min Apgar scores, zone and stage at the time of treatment, recurrence of ROP and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (logMAR), equivalent spherical value (SE), ocular complications, and developmental delay at the age of 5.

RESULTS

More zone I low-stage eyes were treated with IVB than laser. There was no difference in BCVA (p = 0.836). Although the mean SE was not different between the groups (p = 0.280), the prevalence of myopia was significantly higher in the laser group (p = 0.020). Developmental delay was observed in 3 of 14 and 3 of 12 cases in the laser and IVB groups, respectively (p = 0.596). Retinal holes were observed in 2 eyes in the IVB group, with 1 developing localized retinal detachment. There were no significant differences between the groups in the other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to laser for ROP, IVB was not inferior in neurodevelopment or visual outcome and was superior in refractive error. As cases in the IVB group showed retinal holes, long-term follow-up with fundus examination is recommended after IVB.