Japan-Clinical Retina Study Group (J-CREST), Kagoshima, Japan.
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Eye (Lond). 2023 Dec;37(17):3589-3595. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02559-z. Epub 2023 May 6.
To compare real-world, long-term outcomes of laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies in patients with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
This was a multicentre retrospective study. We included 264 eyes of 139 patients treated for type 1 ROP or aggressive ROP (AROP) who were followed for at least 4 years. Laser treatment was initially performed in 187 eyes (the laser group), and anti-VEGF therapy was initially performed in 77 eyes (the anti-VEGF group). We collected data on sex, birth characteristics, zone, stage, and the presence of plus disease at the time of treatment and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalent (SE), and ocular complications (amblyopia and strabismus) in patients aged 4-6 years. We investigated the associations between treatment outcomes (BCVA, SE and the presence of amblyopia and strabismus) and influencing factors, including treatment procedure (anti-VEGF or laser therapy), sex, birth characteristics, zone, stage, and the presence of plus disease, using multivariable analysis and logistic regression analyses.
The initial treatment procedure was not associated with any specific treatment outcome. Subgroup analysis of patients with zone I ROP revealed that the anti-VEGF-treated eyes had significantly better BCVA and higher SE than laser-treated eyes (p = 0.004, p = 0.009, respectively). Female patients presented significantly better BCVA, less amblyopia and less strabismus than male patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.029, p = 0.008, respectively).
In zone I ROP, anti-VEGF therapy led to better visual acuity and less myopic refractive error than laser treatment.
比较早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)患者激光和抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗的真实世界长期结局。
这是一项多中心回顾性研究。我们纳入了 139 名患者的 264 只眼,这些患者接受了至少 4 年的治疗,患有 1 型 ROP 或侵袭性 ROP(AROP)。187 只眼(激光组)最初接受了激光治疗,77 只眼(抗 VEGF 组)最初接受了抗 VEGF 治疗。我们收集了治疗时的性别、出生特征、区、期、plus 病的存在以及 4-6 岁患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、球镜等效(SE)和眼部并发症(弱视和斜视)的数据。我们使用多变量分析和逻辑回归分析,研究了治疗结局(BCVA、SE 和弱视和斜视的存在)与治疗程序(抗 VEGF 或激光治疗)、性别、出生特征、区、期和 plus 病的存在等影响因素之间的关系。
初始治疗程序与任何特定的治疗结局均无关。对 I 区 ROP 患者的亚组分析显示,抗 VEGF 治疗组的 BCVA 明显优于激光治疗组(p=0.004,p=0.009)。女性患者的 BCVA 明显更好,弱视和斜视的发生率明显更低,与男性患者相比(p<0.001,p=0.029,p=0.008)。
在 I 区 ROP 中,抗 VEGF 治疗导致更好的视力和更小的近视屈光误差,优于激光治疗。