Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Marienkrankenhaus Hamburg, Alfredstr. 9, 22087, Hamburg, Germany.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 May;110(5):699-710. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01835-w. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
In recent studies, a 5-stage cardiac damage classification in severe aortic stenosis (AS) based on echocardiographic parameters has shown to provide predictive value regarding clinical outcome. The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of a cardiac damage classification based on invasive hemodynamics in patients with AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
A total of 1400 patients with symptomatic AS and full invasive hemodynamic assessment before TAVR were included. Patients were categorized according to their cardiac damage stage into five groups that are defined as: stage 0, no cardiac damage; stage 1, left ventricular damage; stage 2, left atrial and/or mitral valve damage; stage 3, pulmonary vasculature and/or tricuspid valve damage; stage 4, right ventricular damage.
9.9% patients were classified as stage 0, 23.6% as stage 1, the majority of patients as stage 2 (33.5%), 23.1% as stage 3 and 10% as stage 4. One- and 4-year mortality were 10.1%/29.5% in stage 0, 16.1%/60.6% in stage 1, 17.3%/39.4% in stage 2, 22%/54.6% in stage 3, 27.1%/62.2% in stage 4 (p = 0.001/p < 0.001). The extent of cardiac damage was independently associated with increased mortality after TAVR (HR 1.16 per each increment in stage, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.18; p = 0.018).
Cardiac damage staging in severe AS patients based on invasive hemodynamics appears to show strong association between the extent of cardiac damage and post-TAVR mortality. This staging classification provides predictive value and may improve risk stratification, therapy management and decision-making in patients with AS. Invasive Staging Classification of Cardiac Damage in Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis has an Impact on Outcome after TAVR. (Top) Invasive staging criteria for cardiac damage in five stages using left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) for stage 1 (red), post-capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) for stage 2 (green), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) for stage 3 (purple) and right atrial pressure (RAP) for stage 4 (yellow). The cake chart shows the distribution of the different stage in the whole cohort. (Bottom) Survival Analyses According to Stage of Cardiac Damage after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement using Invasive Criteria. Kaplan-Meier plots comparing overall (left) and cardiovascular (right) 4-year survival showing with the more advancing stage a higher mortality rate.
在最近的研究中,基于超声心动图参数的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的 5 阶段心脏损伤分类显示出对临床结果有预测价值。本研究的目的是研究基于经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前的有创血流动力学的心脏损伤分类对 AS 患者预后的影响。
共纳入 1400 例有症状的 AS 患者,并进行了全面的有创血流动力学评估。根据心脏损伤阶段,患者被分为 5 组:0 期,无心脏损伤;1 期,左心室损伤;2 期,左心房和/或二尖瓣损伤;3 期,肺血管和/或三尖瓣损伤;4 期,右心室损伤。
9.9%的患者被归类为 0 期,23.6%为 1 期,大多数患者为 2 期(33.5%),23.1%为 3 期,10%为 4 期。0 期、1 期、2 期、3 期和 4 期的 1 年和 4 年死亡率分别为 10.1%/29.5%、16.1%/60.6%、17.3%/39.4%、22%/54.6%和 27.1%/62.2%(p=0.001/p<0.001)。TAVR 后,心脏损伤程度与死亡率增加独立相关(每增加 1 个阶段,HR 为 1.16,95%置信区间为 1.03-1.18;p=0.018)。
基于有创血流动力学的严重 AS 患者心脏损伤分期似乎显示出心脏损伤程度与 TAVR 后死亡率之间存在很强的关联。这种分期分类提供了预测价值,并可能改善 AS 患者的风险分层、治疗管理和决策。经导管主动脉瓣置换术后严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的心脏损伤的有创分期分类对预后有影响。(上图)使用左心室舒张末期压(LVEDP)进行 1 期(红色)、毛细血管楔压(PCWP)进行 2 期(绿色)、收缩期肺动脉压(SPAP)进行 3 期(紫色)和右心房压(RAP)进行 4 期(黄色)的 5 期心脏损伤有创分期标准。饼图显示整个队列中不同阶段的分布。(下图)使用有创标准根据心脏损伤阶段进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的生存分析。Kaplan-Meier 分析比较了整体(左)和心血管(右)4 年生存率,显示随着阶段的进展,死亡率越高。