Suppr超能文献

基于心脏损伤程度的主动脉瓣狭窄分期分类。

Staging classification of aortic stenosis based on the extent of cardiac damage.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.

Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2017 Dec 1;38(45):3351-3358. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx381.

Abstract

AIMS

In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), risk stratification for aortic valve replacement (AVR) relies mainly on valve-related factors, symptoms and co-morbidities. We sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of a newly-defined staging classification characterizing the extent of extravalvular (extra-aortic valve) cardiac damage among patients with severe AS undergoing AVR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with severe AS from the PARTNER 2 trials were pooled and classified according to the presence or absence of cardiac damage as detected by echocardiography prior to AVR: no extravalvular cardiac damage (Stage 0), left ventricular damage (Stage 1), left atrial or mitral valve damage (Stage 2), pulmonary vasculature or tricuspid valve damage (Stage 3), or right ventricular damage (Stage 4). One-year outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier techniques and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify 1-year predictors of mortality. In 1661 patients with sufficient echocardiographic data to allow staging, 47 (2.8%) patients were classified as Stage 0, 212 (12.8%) as Stage 1, 844 (50.8%) as Stage 2, 413 (24.9%) as Stage 3, and 145 (8.7%) as Stage 4. One-year mortality was 4.4% in Stage 0, 9.2% in Stage 1, 14.4% in Stage 2, 21.3% in Stage 3, and 24.5% in Stage 4 (Ptrend < 0.0001). The extent of cardiac damage was independently associated with increased mortality after AVR (HR 1.46 per each increment in stage, 95% confidence interval 1.27-1.67, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This newly described staging classification objectively characterizes the extent of cardiac damage associated with AS and has important prognostic implications for clinical outcomes after AVR.

摘要

目的

在主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者中,主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的风险分层主要依赖于瓣膜相关因素、症状和合并症。我们旨在评估一种新定义的分期分类对接受 AVR 的严重 AS 患者的预后影响,该分类特征在于术前超声心动图检测到的瓣环外(瓣环外主动脉瓣)心脏损伤程度。

方法和结果

汇总了 PARTNER 2 试验中的严重 AS 患者,并根据 AVR 前超声心动图检测到的心脏损伤情况进行分类:无瓣环外心脏损伤(分期 0 期)、左心室损伤(分期 1 期)、左心房或二尖瓣损伤(分期 2 期)、肺血管或三尖瓣损伤(分期 3 期)或右心室损伤(分期 4 期)。使用 Kaplan-Meier 技术比较 1 年结果,并使用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型确定 1 年死亡率的预测因素。在 1661 例有足够超声心动图数据进行分期的患者中,47 例(2.8%)患者被分类为 0 期,212 例(12.8%)为 1 期,844 例(50.8%)为 2 期,413 例(24.9%)为 3 期,145 例(8.7%)为 4 期。0 期 1 年死亡率为 4.4%,1 期为 9.2%,2 期为 14.4%,3 期为 21.3%,4 期为 24.5%(Ptrend<0.0001)。心脏损伤程度与 AVR 后死亡率增加独立相关(每增加一个分期 HR 为 1.46,95%置信区间为 1.27-1.67,P<0.0001)。

结论

这种新描述的分期分类客观地描述了与 AS 相关的心脏损伤程度,并对 AVR 后临床结局具有重要的预后意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea67/5837727/a7d31a490071/ehx381f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验