• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意证据差距:在 21 世纪,利用基于患者的证据来创建“完整的 HTA”。

Mind the evidence gap: the use of patient-based evidence to create "complete HTA" in the twenty-first century.

机构信息

Warwick Research in Nursing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, CoventryCV4 7AL, UK.

Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services, SBU, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Mar 22;37:e46. doi: 10.1017/S026646232100012X.

DOI:10.1017/S026646232100012X
PMID:33745475
Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review the concept of patient-based evidence in health technology assessment (HTA), drawing on philosophical ideas of knowledge in order to judge whether current approaches to the use of evidence for HTA are complete. We draw on a number of key sources, including key papers and book chapters, discussion forums, agency reports, and conference presentations. We develop the potential dimensions of patient-based evidence, describe its key attributes, and consider its future development. Patient-based evidence has the potential to be a key concept in HTA, comprised of a series of related elements of importance to patients. We recognize that we raise more questions than can be answered, but as an emerging concept, recognition and understanding of patient-based evidence is still developing. The concepts and methods that support its application in HTA require urgent development. We conclude that clinical and economic forms of evidence are not enough for HTA. For HTA to be complete, we need to consider all relevant aspects of the phenomena, including patient-based evidence. There is now an urgent need for the global research and HTA community to work together to realize the full potential of patient-based evidence through conceptual and methodological development and wider recognition. We advocate that a task force be set up to address these urgent issues.

摘要

本文旨在回顾健康技术评估(HTA)中基于患者的证据概念,借鉴知识哲学思想来判断当前用于 HTA 的证据方法是否完整。我们借鉴了许多主要来源,包括主要论文和章节、讨论论坛、机构报告和会议演讲。我们提出了基于患者的证据的潜在维度,描述了其关键属性,并考虑了其未来的发展。基于患者的证据有可能成为 HTA 的一个关键概念,由一系列与患者相关的重要元素组成。我们认识到,我们提出的问题多于能够回答的问题,但作为一个新兴概念,对基于患者的证据的认识和理解仍在发展中。支持其在 HTA 中应用的概念和方法需要紧急发展。我们的结论是,临床和经济形式的证据不足以进行 HTA。为了使 HTA 完整,我们需要考虑现象的所有相关方面,包括基于患者的证据。现在全球研究和 HTA 界迫切需要共同努力,通过概念和方法的发展以及更广泛的认可,充分发挥基于患者的证据的潜力。我们主张成立一个工作组来解决这些紧迫问题。

相似文献

1
Mind the evidence gap: the use of patient-based evidence to create "complete HTA" in the twenty-first century.注意证据差距:在 21 世纪,利用基于患者的证据来创建“完整的 HTA”。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Mar 22;37:e46. doi: 10.1017/S026646232100012X.
2
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
3
Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).患者报告结局(PRO)在卫生技术评估(HTA)中的信息价值。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme.衡量卫生研究影响的模型与应用:卫生技术评估项目系统评价的更新
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(76):1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta20760.
6
Community views and perspectives on public engagement in health technology assessment decision making.社区对公众参与卫生技术评估决策的看法和观点。
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):68-74. doi: 10.1071/AH15221.
7
Comparison of conference abstracts and presentations with full-text articles in the health technology assessments of rapidly evolving technologies.在快速发展技术的卫生技术评估中,会议摘要和报告与全文文章的比较。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Feb;10(5):iii-iv, ix-145. doi: 10.3310/hta10050.
8
Quo Vadis HTA for Medical Devices in Central and Eastern Europe? Recommendations to Address Methodological Challenges.医疗设备在中东欧的 HTA 走向何方?解决方法学挑战的建议。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jan 8;8:612410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.612410. eCollection 2020.
9
"Same same but different"? On the questionable but crucial differentiation between ethical and social aspects in health technology assessment.“似同实异”?健康技术评估中伦理与社会方面的可疑而关键的区分
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 Aug;164:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.卫生技术评估:欧洲的研究趋势和未来重点。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Jul;16 Suppl 2:6-15. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011050.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient perspectives on continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) for diabetes in Malaysia: a vital voice in health technology assessment (HTA) informing decision-making.马来西亚患者对糖尿病连续血糖监测系统(CGMS)的看法:健康技术评估(HTA)中为决策提供信息的关键声音。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 6;41(1):e13. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325000078.
2
Mapping frameworks for synthesizing qualitative evidence in health technology assessment.健康技术评估中综合定性证据的映射框架。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 13;40(1):e53. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000369.
3
Unleashing the potential: the imperative of political support for health technology assessment in Iran.
释放潜力:伊朗政治对卫生技术评估提供支持的必要性。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00563-x.
4
Understanding the Normativity of Health Technology Assessment: Ontological, Moral, and Epistemological Commitments.理解卫生技术评估的规范性:本体论、道德和认识论承诺。
Health Care Anal. 2024 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00487-x.
5
Experiences Among Patients With Cystic Fibrosis in the MucoExocet Study of Using Connected Devices for the Management of Pulmonary Exacerbations: Grounded Theory Qualitative Research.在使用联网设备管理肺部加重期的黏液外排研究中囊性纤维化患者的经历:扎根理论定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jan 23;8:e38064. doi: 10.2196/38064.
6
The extent and quality of qualitative evidence included in health technology assessments: a review of submissions to NICE and CADTH.卫生技术评估中纳入的定性证据的范围和质量:对 NICE 和 CADTH 提交材料的审查。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Dec 21;40(1):e6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002829.
7
Claims in the clinic: A qualitative group interview study on healthcare communication about unestablished side effects of the copper IUD.临床诉求:关于未确立的铜宫内节育器副作用的医疗保健沟通的定性小组访谈研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 28;18(9):e0291966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291966. eCollection 2023.
8
Patient and citizen participation at the organizational level in health technology assessment: an exploratory study in five jurisdictions.患者和公民在卫生技术评估中的组织层面参与:五个司法管辖区的探索性研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Aug 8;39(1):e51. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000417.
9
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.中东欧国家中患者参与健康技术评估的潜在障碍。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:922708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708. eCollection 2022.
10
Building from Patient Experiences to Deliver Patient-Focused Healthcare Systems in Collaboration with Patients: A Call to Action.从患者体验出发,与患者合作构建以患者为中心的医疗保健系统:行动呼吁。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):848-858. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00432-x. Epub 2022 Jul 19.