• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和公民在卫生技术评估中的组织层面参与:五个司法管辖区的探索性研究。

Patient and citizen participation at the organizational level in health technology assessment: an exploratory study in five jurisdictions.

机构信息

Association Française contre les Myopathies - Téléthon, Evry, France.

Institut national d'excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS), Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Aug 8;39(1):e51. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000417.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462323000417
PMID:37551103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11570056/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While patient participation in individual health technology assessments (HTAs) has been frequently described in the literature, patient and citizen participation at the organizational level is less described and may be less understood and practiced in HTA bodies. We aimed to better understand its use by describing current practice.

METHOD

To elicit descriptive case studies and insights we conducted semi-structured interviews and open-ended questionnaires with HTA body staff and patients and citizens participating at the organizational level in Belgium, France, Quebec, Scotland, and Wales.

RESULTS

We identified examples of organizational participation in managerial aspects: governance, defining patient involvement processes, evaluation processes and methods, and capacity building. Mechanisms included consultation, collaboration, and membership of standing (permanent) groups. These were sometimes combined. Participants were usually from umbrella patient organizations and patient associations, as well as individual patients and citizens.

DISCUSSION

Although the concept, participation at the organizational level, is not well-established, we observed a trend toward growth in each jurisdiction. Some goals were shared for this participation, but HTA bodies focused more on instrumental goals, especially improving participation in HTAs, while patients and citizens were more likely to offer democratic and developmental goals beyond improving participation processes.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide rationales for organizational-level participation from the perspectives of HTA bodies and patients. The case studies provide insights into how to involve participants and who may be seen as legitimate participants. These findings may be useful to HTA bodies, the patient sector, and communities when devising an organizational-level participation framework.

摘要

目的

尽管患者参与个人卫生技术评估(HTA)在文献中经常被描述,但患者和公民在组织层面的参与较少被描述,在 HTA 机构中可能理解和实践得更少。我们旨在通过描述当前实践来更好地了解其使用情况。

方法

为了引出描述性案例研究和见解,我们对 HTA 机构的工作人员和在比利时、法国、魁北克、苏格兰和威尔士以组织形式参与的患者和公民进行了半结构化访谈和开放式问卷调查。

结果

我们确定了组织参与管理方面的例子:治理、定义患者参与流程、评估流程和方法以及能力建设。机制包括咨询、协作和常设(永久)小组的成员资格。这些有时是结合在一起的。参与者通常来自伞式患者组织和患者协会,以及个别患者和公民。

讨论

尽管参与组织层面的概念,即参与组织层面,尚未得到很好的建立,但我们观察到每个司法管辖区都有增长的趋势。对于这种参与,有一些共同的目标,但 HTA 机构更关注工具性目标,特别是改善对 HTA 的参与,而患者和公民更有可能提供民主和发展目标,而不仅仅是改善参与过程。

结论

我们的研究结果从 HTA 机构和患者的角度为组织层面的参与提供了理由。这些案例研究为如何让参与者参与以及谁可能被视为合法参与者提供了见解。这些发现对于 HTA 机构、患者部门和社区制定组织层面的参与框架可能是有用的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c4a/11570056/bc820b9c7ade/S0266462323000417_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c4a/11570056/bc820b9c7ade/S0266462323000417_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c4a/11570056/bc820b9c7ade/S0266462323000417_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient and citizen participation at the organizational level in health technology assessment: an exploratory study in five jurisdictions.患者和公民在卫生技术评估中的组织层面参与:五个司法管辖区的探索性研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Aug 8;39(1):e51. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000417.
2
Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes.明确公众在健康技术评估(HTA)和 HTA 决策过程中的角色。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Apr;36(2):87-95. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000094. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Patients, users, caregivers, and citizens' involvement in local health technology assessment unit in Quebec: a survey.患者、用户、护理人员以及公民参与魁北克地区卫生技术评估机构:一项调查。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Sep 29;37:e5. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000707.
4
International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.五个司法管辖区的比较有效性研究的国际比较:对美国的启示。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000.
5
Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.在地方层面的卫生技术评估中引入患者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 27;9:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-54.
6
Stories of Patient Involvement Impact in Health Technology Assessments: A Discussion Paper.患者参与影响卫生技术评估的故事:讨论文件。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(4):266-272. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000552. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.公众和患者参与卫生技术评估:行动框架
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):256-264. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000362. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
8
[Organizational and systemic conditions of citizen-patient involvement in the development of telehealth in Quebec].[魁北克公民-患者参与远程医疗发展的组织和系统条件]
Sante Publique. 2019 January-February;Vol. 31(1):125-135. doi: 10.3917/spub.191.0125.
9
Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): the views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients.引入患者视角的医院卫生技术评估(HTA):HTA 生产者、医院管理者和患者的观点。
Health Expect. 2014 Dec;17(6):888-900. doi: 10.1111/hex.12010. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
10
Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users.在地方层面让患者参与 HTA 活动:基于研究人员与知识使用者合作的研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 16;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-14.

引用本文的文献

1
Connecting minds and catalyzing collaboration: the interest groups of health technology assessment international.连接思想,促进合作:国际卫生技术评估兴趣小组
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 7;41(1):e43. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100287.
2
Patient Engagement and Patient Experience Data in Regulatory Review and Health Technology Assessment: Where Are We Today?监管审查和卫生技术评估中的患者参与度与患者体验数据:我们如今处于什么阶段?
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s43441-025-00770-6.
3
The European Voice of the Patient living with pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease: Diagnosis, symptoms, impacts, and treatments.

本文引用的文献

1
Mind the evidence gap: the use of patient-based evidence to create "complete HTA" in the twenty-first century.注意证据差距:在 21 世纪,利用基于患者的证据来创建“完整的 HTA”。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Mar 22;37:e46. doi: 10.1017/S026646232100012X.
2
Evaluation of the impact of patient input in health technology assessments at NICE.评价患者意见对 NICE 卫生技术评估的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Jan 29;37:e33. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320002214.
3
Creating a patient and community advisory committee at the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.
欧洲间质性肺疾病相关肺动脉高压患者的心声:诊断、症状、影响及治疗
Pulm Circ. 2024 Jun 22;14(2):e12405. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12405. eCollection 2024 Apr.
在加拿大药品和技术评估署设立患者和社区咨询委员会。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2021 Jan 22;37:e19. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320002251.
4
Developing an agency's position with respect to patient involvement in health technology assessment: the importance of the organizational culture.制定机构在卫生技术评估中涉及患者参与的立场:组织文化的重要性。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Dec;36(6):569-578. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000513. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
5
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration.新的健康技术评估定义:国际合作的里程碑。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
Patients' perspectives can be integrated in health technology assessments: an exploratory analysis of CADTH Common Drug Review.患者的观点可纳入卫生技术评估:对加拿大药品和卫生技术局常见药物审查的探索性分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Jun 7;2:21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0036-9. eCollection 2016.
7
Involving patients in reducing decision uncertainties around orphan and ultra-orphan drugs: a rare opportunity?让患者参与减少围绕孤儿药和超孤儿药的决策不确定性:一个难得的机会?
Patient. 2015 Feb;8(1):29-39. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0106-8.
8
What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation.有效促进公众参与医疗保健改善和政策决策的关键要素有哪些?一项随机试验的过程评估。
Milbank Q. 2014 Jun;92(2):319-50. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12060.
9
"It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.“一切都取决于”:在卫生技术评估机构背景下对公众参与的概念化。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(10):1518-26. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.036. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
10
Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice.将“公众”纳入卫生技术评估和覆盖政策决策:从原则到实践
Health Policy. 2007 Jun;82(1):37-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Sep 22.