Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, FB Suite 6B.1, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, United States.
Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Jun;56(6):1120-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.02.034. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) is validated in adults but not yet in children. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of TI-RADS in predicting thyroid malignancy for pediatric nodules, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy to the current American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.
A single institution retrospective review was performed of patients younger than 21 years who underwent thyroid nodule fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). Two radiologists were blinded to the pathology and independently classified all biopsied thyroid nodules based on TI-RADS. ATA and TI-RADS guidelines were analyzed to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of both scoring systems.
115 patients (median age 15.5 years, 90 females) with 138 nodules were scored using TI-RADS. There was moderate inter-rater agreement between radiologists (Kappa = 0.51; p < 0.0001). Evaluating several potential TI-RADS criteria, 23.2%-68.1% of nodules were recommended for FNAB, compared to 82.6% of nodules using ATA guidelines. Using TI-RADS ≥ 3 (without size cutoff) as an indication for FNAB had 100% sensitivity with no missed suspicious or malignant nodules on cytology or pathology.
Using TI-RADS for diagnostic management of pediatric thyroid nodules improves accuracy in predicting malignancy.
背景/目的:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)已在成人中得到验证,但尚未在儿童中得到验证。本研究的目的是确定 TI-RADS 在预测儿科结节甲状腺恶性肿瘤方面的敏感性、特异性和准确性,并将诊断准确性与当前的美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南进行比较。
对在 21 岁以下接受甲状腺结节细针抽吸活检(FNAB)的患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。两名放射科医生对病理结果不知情,并根据 TI-RADS 对所有进行活检的甲状腺结节进行独立分类。分析 ATA 和 TI-RADS 指南,以确定这两种评分系统的诊断敏感性和特异性。
115 名患者(中位年龄 15.5 岁,90 名女性)的 138 个结节进行了 TI-RADS 评分。两名放射科医生之间存在中度的观察者间一致性(Kappa=0.51;p<0.0001)。评估了几个潜在的 TI-RADS 标准,与使用 ATA 指南的 82.6%的结节相比,23.2%-68.1%的结节建议进行 FNAB。使用 TI-RADS≥3(无大小截止值)作为 FNAB 的指征,在细胞学或组织学上对可疑或恶性结节的敏感性为 100%,无漏诊。
使用 TI-RADS 对儿科甲状腺结节进行诊断管理可提高预测恶性肿瘤的准确性。