Suppr超能文献

关于协助自杀和安乐死的争论方式:对精神病学的影响。

Ways of Debating Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Implications for Psychiatry.

出版信息

Perspect Biol Med. 2021;64(1):29-43. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2021.0003.

Abstract

Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) is permitted in a handful of jurisdictions. But its scope (ranging from being restricted to the end of life to no restrictions save those of autonomy) and its legal basis (ranging from a necessary prerogative of physicians to a human right) vary greatly. The debate over psychiatric EAS (pEAS) needs to be understood within this complex context. This essay addresses one specific aspect: can pEAS be grounded on a basic human right? The author argues against pEAS as grounded on a basic human right by showing that such a view has several implications we ought not accept.

摘要

安乐死或协助自杀(EAS)在少数司法管辖区是允许的。但它的范围(从限制在生命末期到除自主权外没有任何限制)及其法律依据(从医生的必要特权到人权)差异很大。在这种复杂的情况下,需要理解精神病学安乐死(pEAS)的争论。本文讨论了一个具体方面:pEAS 是否可以基于基本人权?作者通过表明这种观点有几个我们不应该接受的含义,来反对将 pEAS 建立在基本人权之上。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验