What Does True Equality in Assisted Dying Require?
作者信息
Kim Scott Y H
机构信息
Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2244318.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
What Does True Equality in Assisted Dying Require?辅助死亡中的真正平等需要什么？
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2244318.
2
Distinguishing "Reasonable Accommodation" From Physical Assistance in Aid-in-Dying.区分“合理便利”与协助自杀中的身体协助。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237474.
3
Current Medical Aid-in-Dying Laws Discriminate against Individuals with Disabilities.现行的医疗辅助死亡法歧视残疾人。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):33-35. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237465.
4
Assisted dying debate. A baroness replies.安乐死辩论。一位女男爵作出回应。
BMJ. 2009 Sep 14;339:b3762. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3762.
5
Aid in Dying Unaided?无人协助的安乐死？
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):38-40. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237445.
6
Disability-based arguments against assisted dying laws.基于残疾的反对安乐死法律的论点。
Bioethics. 2022 Jul;36(6):680-686. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13036. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
7
The Importance of Self-Administration of Aid-in-Dying Medication.临终关怀药物自我给药的重要性。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):18-20. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2241317.
8
Accommodating Aid-in-Dying Safeguards for Patients with Neurologic Disease.为神经疾病患者提供临终关怀辅助的保障措施。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):16-18. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237451.
9
Would judicial consent for assisted dying protect vulnerable people?司法对协助死亡的同意能保护弱势群体吗？
BMJ. 2015 Aug 19;351:h4437. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4437.
10
Preventing the Slide down the Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Euthanasia While Protecting the Rights of People with Disabilities Who Are "Not Dead Yet.".防止从协助自杀到安乐死的滑坡现象，同时保护“尚未死亡”的残疾人的权利。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):20-22. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2237455.
引用本文的文献
1
Incidence and Prevalence of Reported Euthanasia Cases in Belgium, 2002 to 2023.2002年至2023年比利时报告的安乐死病例的发病率和患病率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256841. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6841.
2
Canadian Medical Assistance in Dying and the Hegemony of Privilege.加拿大的医疗协助死亡与特权霸权
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Nov;23(11):1-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2264096. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
本文引用的文献
1
Neurologic Diseases and Medical Aid in Dying: Aid-in-Dying Laws Create an Underclass of Patients Based on Disability.神经疾病和安乐死医疗援助：安乐死法律基于残疾制造了一个病人的下层阶级。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Sep;23(9):5-15. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105422. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
The Unstable Boundary of Suffering-Based Euthanasia Regimes.基于痛苦的安乐死制度的不稳定边界。
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Feb;22(2):59-62. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2015964.
3
Ways of Debating Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Implications for Psychiatry.关于协助自杀和安乐死的争论方式：对精神病学的影响。
Perspect Biol Med. 2021;64(1):29-43. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2021.0003.
4
Lives Not Worth Living in Modern Euthanasia Regimes.现代安乐死制度下不值得活下去的生命。
J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2019 Jun;16(2):134-136. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12300. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
5
Parity Arguments for 'Physician Aid-in-Dying' (PAD) for Psychiatric Disorders: Their Structure and Limits.精神疾病“医生协助死亡”（PAD）的对等性论证：其结构与局限性
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Oct;19(10):3-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1659606.
6
Extending' euthanasia to those 'tired of living' in the Netherlands could jeopardize a well-functioning practice of physicians' assessment of a patient's request for death.将“安乐死”扩大到那些在荷兰“厌倦生活”的人，可能会危及医生评估患者死亡请求的良好实践。
Health Policy. 2018 Mar;122(3):315-319. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
7
The Dutch Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (Review Procedures) Act.荷兰《请求终止生命及协助自杀（审查程序）法》
Ethical Perspect. 2002;9(2-3):176-81. doi: 10.2143/ep.9.2.503855.
Zotero 插件