Perspect Biol Med. 2021;64(1):70-81. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2021.0006.
This article examines the discrepancies between the rhetoric surrounding deinstitutionalization and community care and the reality of the abandonment of the seriously mentally ill to their fate. It discusses how the earlier commitment to the asylum came to be abandoned, analyzes various attempts to explain why the mentally ill were decanted from institutions into a largely unreceptive community, and dissects the shortcomings of these actions. The realities of care in the community and the connections of deinstitutionalization to the collapse of public psychiatry, the epidemic of homelessness, and the place of jails as our primary in-patient response to serious mental illness are explored, as is the curious political coalition that endorsed the end of the asylum. The connections of deinstitutionalization to the rise of neoliberal ideas are documented, and the impact of the changed public policy on the life expectancy of those with serious mental illness is analyzed.
本文考察了围绕去机构化和社区护理的言论与严重精神疾病患者被放任自流这一现实之间的差异。本文讨论了早期对庇护所的承诺是如何被放弃的,分析了各种试图解释为什么精神疾病患者从机构中被转移到一个基本上不接受他们的社区的原因,并剖析了这些行为的缺陷。本文探讨了社区护理的现实,以及去机构化与公共精神病学崩溃、无家可归现象的流行以及监狱作为我们对严重精神疾病的主要住院治疗方式之间的联系,还探讨了支持庇护所终结的奇特的政治联盟。本文记录了去机构化与新自由主义思想兴起的联系,并分析了公共政策的变化对患有严重精神疾病的人的预期寿命的影响。