Păun Radu-Mihai, Matei Valentin Petre, Tudose Cătălina
Department of Psychiatry, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
"Prof. Dr. Alexandru Obregia" Clinical Psychiatric Hospital, 041914 Bucharest, Romania.
Alpha Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 28;26(1):38789. doi: 10.31083/AP38789. eCollection 2025 Feb.
Hospitalized at least three times in a two-year period, have emerged as an unintended side effect of the deinstitutionalization of mental health in high-income countries. Guaranteeing access to high-quality outpatient services has shown to be the most effective method for alleviating the revolving door phenomenon. In Eastern Europe, deinstitutionalization is ongoing, 0 but the phenomenon has received little attention. The present cross-sectional study examined the revolving door phenomenon in the largest psychiatric inpatient unit in Bucharest, Romania.
Socio-demographic healthcare use and clinical characteristics of 144 patients were collected following admission to the "Profesor Doctor Alexandru Obregia" Psychiatric Hospital via an initial visit conducted between September 2022 and January 2023. A follow-up check occurred one year later to evaluate the number of readmissions and compare those who met the criteria for revolving door status at follow-up with those who did not. After identifying factors associated with revolving door status by univariate analysis, a bivariate model included the results to account for reciprocal moderating effects.
In total, 56 (38.9%) patients met the criteria for revolving door status. The number of lifetime hospitalizations was significantly higher in the revolving door group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.956, ≤ 0.001), while involuntary admission on the initial visit decreased the odds of receiving a revolving door status on follow-up (OR = 0.188, = 0.008). Revolving door patients had less time between readmissions than controls (OR = 0.991, < 0.001).
Frequent hospitalization was the primary factor predicting revolving door status in the cohort studied, reflecting the Romanian mental health system's focus on inpatient care. This illustrates the need for reliable outpatient care as an alternative to hospital admission to avoid the self-perpetuating cycle of repeated admissions that are inefficient both from an economic and medical standpoint.
在两年内至少住院三次,已成为高收入国家心理健康非机构化的意外副作用。保证获得高质量的门诊服务已被证明是缓解“旋转门”现象的最有效方法。在东欧,非机构化正在进行中,但这一现象很少受到关注。本横断面研究调查了罗马尼亚布加勒斯特最大的精神病住院单元中的“旋转门”现象。
2022年9月至2023年1月期间,通过首次就诊收集了144名入住“亚历山德鲁·奥布雷贾教授医生”精神病医院患者的社会人口统计学医疗使用情况和临床特征。一年后进行随访检查,以评估再入院次数,并将随访时符合“旋转门”状态标准的患者与不符合标准的患者进行比较。通过单因素分析确定与“旋转门”状态相关的因素后,二元模型纳入结果以解释相互调节作用。
共有56名(38.9%)患者符合“旋转门”状态标准。“旋转门”组的终身住院次数显著更高(优势比(OR)=3.956,P≤0.001),而初次就诊时的非自愿入院降低了随访时获得“旋转门”状态的几率(OR=0.188,P=0.008)。“旋转门”患者两次再入院之间的时间比对照组短(OR=0.991,P<0.001)。
频繁住院是所研究队列中预测“旋转门”状态的主要因素,反映了罗马尼亚心理健康系统对住院治疗的关注。这表明需要可靠的门诊护理作为住院治疗的替代方案,以避免从经济和医疗角度来看都效率低下的反复入院的自我延续循环。