Sanabria Tanya, Penner Andrew, Domina Thurston
Department of Sociology, California State University, Los Angeles, 5151 State University Drive, KH A3036, Los Angeles, CA 90032.
Department of Sociology, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 4181 Social Science Plaza A, Irvine, CA 92697.
Res High Educ. 2020 Jun;61(4):459-484. doi: 10.1007/s11162-020-09590-z. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
Colleges offer remedial coursework to help students enrolling in post-secondary education who are not adequately prepared to succeed in college-level courses. Despite the prevalence of remediation, previous research presents contradictory findings regarding its short- and long-term effects. This paper uses a doubly robust inverse probability weighting strategy to examine whether the degree completion and wage outcomes associated with remedial education vary by passing or failing remedial coursework. Using the NLSY Postsecondary Transcript-1997 data, we find that almost 30% of remedial course takers fail a remedial course. Students who took and passed their remedial coursework at both two-year and four-year colleges were more likely to graduate from college than similar students who did not take remediation. For both two-year and four-year college entrants, students who failed remedial coursework were less likely to obtain a bachelor's degree and, among degree receivers, took longer to graduate. Students who entered two-year or four-year colleges and who failed remedial coursework earned lower wages over time compared to similar students who never took remediation. Among four-year college entrants, these wage differences seem to be explained completely by degree completion. However, wage differences for two-year college entrants still remain after accounting for degree receipt. Our findings thus suggest that while many students may benefit from remedial education, a substantial number of students struggle with remedial coursework and fail to realize the intended benefits.
大学提供补习课程,以帮助那些在进入高等教育阶段时未做好充分准备、无法在大学水平课程中取得成功的学生。尽管补习很普遍,但先前的研究在其短期和长期影响方面给出了相互矛盾的结果。本文采用双重稳健逆概率加权策略,来检验与补习教育相关的学位完成情况和工资结果是否因补习课程及格或不及格而有所不同。利用1997年全国青年纵向调查(NLSY)的高等教育成绩单数据,我们发现,近30%的补习课程修读学生未能通过补习课程。在两年制和四年制大学修读并通过补习课程的学生,比未参加补习的类似学生更有可能从大学毕业。对于两年制和四年制大学的入学新生而言,补习课程不及格的学生获得学士学位的可能性较小,而且在获得学位的学生中,毕业所需时间更长。与从未参加补习的类似学生相比,进入两年制或四年制大学且补习课程不及格的学生,随着时间推移收入更低。在四年制大学的入学新生中,这些工资差异似乎完全可以由学位完成情况来解释。然而,在考虑了学位获得情况之后,两年制大学入学新生的工资差异仍然存在。因此,我们的研究结果表明,虽然许多学生可能会从补习教育中受益,但相当多的学生在补习课程中遇到困难,未能实现预期的好处。