• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

约翰内斯堡一家一级创伤中心的空难损伤模式分析:一项回顾性队列研究。

An analysis of air-crash injury patterns presenting at a level 1 trauma unit in Johannesburg, a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Makhadi S, Moeng M S, Pswarayi R

机构信息

Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.

Milpark Hospital, South Africa.

出版信息

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar 4;64:102194. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102194. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102194
PMID:33747495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7970024/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the twenty-first century, transportation disasters and subsequent injuries are on the rise, in particular air travel, and, thus, contributing significantly to the morbidity and mortality. Aviation injuries are not common in South Africa, injuries and outcomes of patients involved in aircraft crashes are unknown. We aimed to describe the injury patterns, and mortality rate resulting from air crashes presenting at a level 1 trauma centre in Johannesburg, South Africa.

METHODS

Data was collected between January 2011 and December 2019. The hospital trauma database was used to obtain data related to patients who were involved in aircraft crashes. Their demographics, type of related aircraft, injuries sustained, injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS), revised trauma score (RTS) surgical intervention carried out, length of stay in ICU, length of hospital stay, morbidities, 28-day mortality and outcomes (discharge/death).

RESULTS

Fifty-two (52) patients (mean age was 44,8 years) were identified. The mean ISS was 9, and NISS was 11. Patients were occupants of civilian, non-commercial, powered aircraft. Fixed wing constituted 63,46%, followed by helicopters 21,15% and 7,69%. Spinal injuries were the most common injury in our patients, followed by soft tissue injuries and rib fractures. The median hospital stay was 10 ± 22 days. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 7.7.

CONCLUSION

Majority of patients sustained musculoskeletal injuries. We suggest that these injured patients should be managed at a Level 1 facility in view of combined multiple injuries sustained during the crash.

摘要

背景

在21世纪,交通灾难及随后造成的伤害呈上升趋势,尤其是航空旅行方面,因此对发病率和死亡率有显著影响。在南非,航空伤害并不常见,涉及飞机坠毁的患者的损伤情况及预后尚不清楚。我们旨在描述在南非约翰内斯堡一家一级创伤中心就诊的飞机坠毁所致损伤模式及死亡率。

方法

收集2011年1月至2019年12月的数据。利用医院创伤数据库获取与飞机坠毁相关患者的数据。包括他们的人口统计学资料、相关飞机类型、所受损伤、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、新损伤严重程度评分(NISS)、修订创伤评分(RTS)、实施的外科干预、在重症监护病房的住院时间、住院总时长、并发症、28天死亡率及预后(出院/死亡)。

结果

共识别出52例患者(平均年龄44.8岁)。平均ISS为9,NISS为11。患者均为民用、非商业动力飞机的乘客。固定翼飞机占63.46%,其次是直升机占21.15%,其他占7.69%。脊柱损伤是我们患者中最常见的损伤,其次是软组织损伤和肋骨骨折。中位住院时间为10±22天。总体院内死亡率为7.7%。

结论

大多数患者遭受了肌肉骨骼损伤。鉴于这些受伤患者在坠机过程中合并有多处损伤,我们建议应在一级医疗机构对其进行治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7970024/b92bedcb3b22/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7970024/b92bedcb3b22/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe5/7970024/b92bedcb3b22/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
An analysis of air-crash injury patterns presenting at a level 1 trauma unit in Johannesburg, a retrospective cohort study.约翰内斯堡一家一级创伤中心的空难损伤模式分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Mar 4;64:102194. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102194. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of road traffic crashes related thoracic traumas: analysis of 5095 hospitalized chest injury patients.道路交通事故相关胸部创伤的流行病学和临床特征:5095 例住院胸部损伤患者的分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Aug 4;16(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01599-4.
3
Occupant and crash characteristics in thoracic and lumbar spine injuries resulting from motor vehicle collisions.机动车碰撞导致胸腰椎损伤中的驾乘人员与碰撞特征
Spine J. 2014 Oct 1;14(10):2355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.01.038. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
4
A comparison of Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score after penetrating trauma: A prospective analysis.穿透性创伤后损伤严重程度评分与新损伤严重程度评分的比较:一项前瞻性分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Aug;79(2):269-74. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000753.
5
The new injury severity score is a better predictor of extended hospitalization and intensive care unit admission than the injury severity score in patients with multiple orthopaedic injuries.对于多发骨科损伤患者,新损伤严重程度评分比损伤严重程度评分更能预测延长住院时间和入住重症监护病房的情况。
J Orthop Trauma. 2003 Aug;17(7):508-12. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00006.
6
Severe traffic injuries in the Helsinki Trauma Registry between 2009-2018.2009-2018 年赫尔辛基创伤登记处的严重交通伤害。
Injury. 2020 Dec;51(12):2946-2952. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.025. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Comparison of the new Exponential Injury Severity Score with the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score in trauma patients: A cross-sectional study.新指数损伤严重度评分与损伤严重度评分及新损伤严重度评分在创伤患者中的比较:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187871. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparison of trauma scoring systems for predicting mortality in firearm injuries.用于预测火器伤死亡率的创伤评分系统比较
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Nov;15(6):559-64.
9
[Civilian blast injuries: an underestimated problem? : Results of a retrospective analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU®].[平民爆炸伤:一个被低估的问题?:创伤登记DGU®回顾性分析结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2016 Oct;119(10):843-53. doi: 10.1007/s00113-015-0046-3.
10
Injury characteristics and outcome of road traffic crash victims at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania.坦桑尼亚西北部布甘多医疗中心道路交通碰撞受害者的损伤特征与结局
J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012 Feb 9;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-6-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Air Crash Investigation: Pattern of Spinal Injuries, Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic, and Outcomes.空难调查:脊柱损伤模式、新冠疫情期间的管理及结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Sep;16(5):899-907. doi: 10.14444/8342. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of Medical Response in 2015 TransAsia Airways Flight 235 Aircraft Crash.2015年复兴航空235号班机空难医疗救援回顾
J Acute Med. 2019 Sep 1;9(3):145-148. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.201909_9(3).0006.
2
STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery.STROCSS 2019 指南:加强外科学队列研究报告。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Criteria and models for the distribution of casualties in trauma-related mass casualty incidents: a systematic literature review protocol.
创伤相关群发伤事件中伤亡分布的标准和模型:系统文献回顾方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 12;6(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0538-z.
4
How to define severely injured patients? -- an Injury Severity Score (ISS) based approach alone is not sufficient.如何定义重伤患者?——仅基于损伤严重度评分(ISS)的方法是不够的。
Injury. 2014 Oct;45 Suppl 3:S64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.020.
5
Trauma scoring systems and databases.创伤评分系统和数据库。
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Aug;113(2):286-94. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu242.
6
A report of the injuries sustained in Iran Air Flight 277 that crashed near Urmia, Iran.伊朗航空 277 号航班在伊朗乌尔米亚附近坠毁事故中受伤情况的报告。
Arch Iran Med. 2012 May;15(5):317-9.
7
Aviation-related injury morbidity and mortality: data from U.S. health information systems.航空相关损伤的发病率和死亡率:来自美国健康信息系统的数据。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2009 Dec;80(12):1001-5. doi: 10.3357/asem.2575.2009.
8
Crash risk in general aviation.通用航空中的坠机风险。
JAMA. 2007 Apr 11;297(14):1596-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.14.1596.
9
Trauma scoring.创伤评分
Scand J Surg. 2002;91(1):12-22. doi: 10.1177/145749690209100104.
10
Light aircraft crash--a case analysis of injuries.
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 May;4(5):337-9.