Yoshizako Takeshi, Yoshida Rika, Asou Hiroya, Nakamura Megumi, Kitagaki Hajime
Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Enya Izumo, Japan.
Acta Radiol Open. 2021 Feb 22;10(2):2058460121994737. doi: 10.1177/2058460121994737. eCollection 2021 Feb.
Echo-planar imaging (EPI)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) may take unclear image affected by susceptibility, geometric distortions and chemical shift artifacts.
To compare the image quality and usefulness of EPI-DWI and turbo spin echo (TSE)-DWI in female patients who required imaging of the pelvis.
All 57 patients were examined with a 3.0-T MR scanner. Both TSE- and EPI-DWI were performed with b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm. We compared geometric distortion, the contrast ratio (CR) of the myometrium to the muscle and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for the myometrium and lesion. Two radiologists scored the TSE- and EPI-DWI of each patient for qualitative evaluation.
The mean percent distortion was significantly smaller with TSE- than EPI-DWI ( = 0.00). The CR was significantly higher with TSE- than EPI-DWI ( = 0.003). There was a significant difference in the ADC value for the uterus and lesions between the EPI- and TSE-DWI ( < 0.05). Finally, the ADC values of cancer were significantly different from those for the uterus and benign with both the two sequences ( < 0.05). The scores for ghosting artifacts were higher with TSE- than EPI-DWI ( = 0.019). But there were no significant differences between TSE- and EPI-DWI with regard to image contrast and overall image quality.
TSE-DWI on the female pelvis by 3T MRI produces less distortion and higher CR than EPI-DWI, but there is no difference in contrast and image quality.
回波平面成像(EPI)-扩散加权成像(DWI)可能会受到敏感性、几何变形和化学位移伪影的影响而导致图像不清晰。
比较EPI-DWI和快速自旋回波(TSE)-DWI在需要进行骨盆成像的女性患者中的图像质量和实用性。
57例患者均采用3.0-T磁共振扫描仪进行检查。TSE-DWI和EPI-DWI均采用b值为0和1000 s/mm进行。我们比较了几何变形、子宫肌层与肌肉的对比度(CR)以及子宫肌层和病变的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。两位放射科医生对每位患者的TSE-DWI和EPI-DWI进行评分以进行定性评估。
TSE-DWI的平均变形百分比明显小于EPI-DWI(P = 0.00)。TSE-DWI的CR明显高于EPI-DWI(P = 0.003)。EPI-DWI和TSE-DWI之间子宫和病变的ADC值存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。最后,两种序列下癌症的ADC值与子宫和良性病变的ADC值均存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。TSE-DWI的鬼影伪影评分高于EPI-DWI(P = 0.019)。但在图像对比度和整体图像质量方面,TSE-DWI和EPI-DWI之间没有显著差异。
3T MRI对女性骨盆进行TSE-DWI时,与EPI-DWI相比,产生的变形更小,CR更高,但在对比度和图像质量方面没有差异。