Stiles-Davis J, Janowsky J, Engel M, Nass R
University of California, San Diego 92093.
Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(3):359-71. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(88)90091-7.
The drawings of four 5-yr-old children, two with left and two right hemisphere congenital brain injury, were compared with those of 20 normal 3.5-5 yr-olds. Two types of drawings were evaluated: copied geometric forms and free drawings. The children with left hemisphere injury showed normal development in both copying and free drawing. The children with right hemisphere injury were developmentally impaired in the copying task. In addition, their free drawings lacked configurational coherence; they included the elements of the figures but failed to arrange them in spatially organized ways. This failure to organize spatially elements is consistent with the descriptions of spatial cognitive disorders found in the drawings of adults with right parietal brain lesions.
研究人员将4名5岁儿童(其中2名左半球先天性脑损伤,2名右半球先天性脑损伤)的绘画作品与20名3.5至5岁正常儿童的绘画作品进行了比较。评估了两种类型的绘画:复制几何图形和自由绘画。左半球损伤的儿童在复制和自由绘画方面均表现出正常发育。右半球损伤的儿童在复制任务中存在发育障碍。此外,他们的自由绘画缺乏结构连贯性;他们画出了图形的元素,但未能以空间组织的方式将它们排列起来。这种在空间上组织元素的失败与右顶叶脑损伤成人绘画中发现的空间认知障碍描述一致。