• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Three datasets reporting unexpected events for everyday scenarios: Over 9000 events human-labelled for overall valence/sentiment, topic category, and relationship to the initial goal of the scenario.三个数据集报告日常场景中的意外事件:超过9000个事件由人工标注了整体效价/情感、主题类别以及与场景初始目标的关系。
Data Brief. 2021 Mar 3;35:106935. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106935. eCollection 2021 Apr.
2
People's reports of unexpected events for everyday scenarios: Over 1000 textual responses, human-labelled for valence/sentiment, controllability and topic category.人们对日常场景中意外事件的报告:超过1000条文本回复,由人工标注效价/情感、可控性和主题类别。
Data Brief. 2022 Aug 17;44:108545. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108545. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Do we "fear for the worst" or "Hope for the best" in thinking about the unexpected?: Factors affecting the valence of unexpected outcomes reported for everyday scenarios.在思考意料之外的事情时,我们是“担心最坏的情况”还是“抱最好的希望”?:影响日常情景中报告的意外结果效价的因素。
Cognition. 2021 Mar;208:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104520. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
4
Words describing feelings about death: A comparison of sentiment for self and others and changes over time.描述对死亡感受的词汇:自我和他人的情感比较及随时间的变化。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0242848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242848. eCollection 2021.
5
Factors affecting "expectations of the unexpected": The impact of controllability & valence on unexpected outcomes.影响“对意外的期待”的因素:可控性和效价对意外结果的影响。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105142. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105142. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
6
Understanding and improving the quality and reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks.理解并提高Jupyter笔记本的质量和可重复性。
Empir Softw Eng. 2021;26(4):65. doi: 10.1007/s10664-021-09961-9. Epub 2021 May 8.
7
The sentiment of a virtual rock concert.一场虚拟摇滚音乐会的氛围。
Virtual Real. 2023;27(2):651-675. doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00685-9. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
The Development of the Chinese Sentiment Lexicon for Internet.
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 5;10:2473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02473. eCollection 2019.
9
Hierarchical human-like strategy for aspect-level sentiment classification with sentiment linguistic knowledge and reinforcement learning.基于情感语言知识和强化学习的分层类人情感分类策略。
Neural Netw. 2019 Sep;117:240-248. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.05.021. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
10
Semi-supervised distributed representations of documents for sentiment analysis.用于情感分析的文档的半监督分布式表示。
Neural Netw. 2019 Nov;119:139-150. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Do we "fear for the worst" or "Hope for the best" in thinking about the unexpected?: Factors affecting the valence of unexpected outcomes reported for everyday scenarios.在思考意料之外的事情时,我们是“担心最坏的情况”还是“抱最好的希望”?:影响日常情景中报告的意外结果效价的因素。
Cognition. 2021 Mar;208:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104520. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
2
Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: the mobilization-minimization hypothesis.积极和消极事件的不对称效应:动员-最小化假说
Psychol Bull. 1991 Jul;110(1):67-85. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.67.

三个数据集报告日常场景中的意外事件:超过9000个事件由人工标注了整体效价/情感、主题类别以及与场景初始目标的关系。

Three datasets reporting unexpected events for everyday scenarios: Over 9000 events human-labelled for overall valence/sentiment, topic category, and relationship to the initial goal of the scenario.

作者信息

Quinn Molly S, Keane Mark T

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland.

Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2021 Mar 3;35:106935. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106935. eCollection 2021 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.dib.2021.106935
PMID:33748368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7967011/
Abstract

The three datasets described in this paper were collected from online experiments distributed via Prolific.co participant system. Together, the three datasets comprise 9720 text responses of unexpected events participants predicted for everyday scenarios such as going shopping or preparing breakfast. Each event was labelled by at least two independent, human raters on their topic or category (relative to their initial scenario), the valence or sentiment of the event, and whether or not the event mentions words related to the goal stated in the initial scenario. We also include summary data from a pre- and post-test conducted in the course of these experiments, as well as the analysis code in the form of Jupyter Notebooks. We provide this data and relevant code for transparency and reproducibility alongside our paper. The dataset could be useful in training machine learning models on valence/sentiment of everyday unexpected events.

摘要

本文中描述的三个数据集是通过Prolific.co参与者系统进行的在线实验收集的。这三个数据集总共包含9720条针对日常场景(如购物或准备早餐)中意外事件参与者的文本回复。每个事件至少由两名独立的人工评分者根据其主题或类别(相对于其初始场景)、事件的效价或情感以及该事件是否提及与初始场景中所述目标相关的词语进行标注。我们还包括在这些实验过程中进行的预测试和后测试的汇总数据,以及Jupyter Notebook形式的分析代码。为了保证透明度和可重复性,我们在论文中提供了这些数据和相关代码。该数据集可用于训练关于日常意外事件效价/情感的机器学习模型。