• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响“对意外的期待”的因素:可控性和效价对意外结果的影响。

Factors affecting "expectations of the unexpected": The impact of controllability & valence on unexpected outcomes.

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland.

School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Ireland; Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105142. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105142. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105142
PMID:35490535
Abstract

Do people have specific "expectations about the unexpected" when they think about the future? Recent work supports a "negativity bias", that people expect future events to be disrupted by unexpected negative outcomes. However, when the current situation is negative, they report more positive unexpected outcomes (e.g., negative experiences lead many to imagine a future of unexpected positive outcomes). The present study (N = 219 Prolific.co participants; with a pre-test of N = 64) explored whether people also show an "uncontrollability bias"; best-laid plans are often disrupted by uncontrollable events. People thought of unexpected outcomes for 8 everyday scenarios, matched on valence and controllability, generating a total of 1752 distinct responses. Participants mainly report negative-uncontrollable unexpected events (34%). However, in contrast to prior work (i) negatively-valenced scenarios elicit more controllable unexpected outcomes, and (ii) uncontrollable scenarios elicit more positive unexpected outcomes. The implications of these results for everyday cognition and decision making are discussed.

摘要

当人们思考未来时,他们是否对意外有特定的“预期”?最近的研究支持“负面偏差”,即人们预计未来的事件会被意外的负面结果所打乱。然而,当当前的情况是负面的时,他们会报告更多积极的意外结果(例如,负面经历会让许多人想象未来会有意外的积极结果)。本研究(N=219 名 Prolific.co 参与者;预先测试 N=64)探讨了人们是否也表现出“不可控性偏差”;精心策划的计划往往会被不可控的事件打乱。参与者思考了 8 个日常场景的意外结果,这些场景在效价和可控性上相匹配,共产生了 1752 个不同的反应。参与者主要报告了负面不可控的意外事件(34%)。然而,与之前的研究相比,(i)负面效价的场景引发了更多可控的意外结果,(ii)不可控的场景引发了更多积极的意外结果。这些结果对日常认知和决策的影响将在讨论中进行探讨。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting "expectations of the unexpected": The impact of controllability & valence on unexpected outcomes.影响“对意外的期待”的因素:可控性和效价对意外结果的影响。
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105142. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105142. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Do we "fear for the worst" or "Hope for the best" in thinking about the unexpected?: Factors affecting the valence of unexpected outcomes reported for everyday scenarios.在思考意料之外的事情时,我们是“担心最坏的情况”还是“抱最好的希望”?:影响日常情景中报告的意外结果效价的因素。
Cognition. 2021 Mar;208:104520. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104520. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
People's reports of unexpected events for everyday scenarios: Over 1000 textual responses, human-labelled for valence/sentiment, controllability and topic category.人们对日常场景中意外事件的报告:超过1000条文本回复,由人工标注效价/情感、可控性和主题类别。
Data Brief. 2022 Aug 17;44:108545. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108545. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Three datasets reporting unexpected events for everyday scenarios: Over 9000 events human-labelled for overall valence/sentiment, topic category, and relationship to the initial goal of the scenario.三个数据集报告日常场景中的意外事件:超过9000个事件由人工标注了整体效价/情感、主题类别以及与场景初始目标的关系。
Data Brief. 2021 Mar 3;35:106935. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106935. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Does the future look bright? Processing style determines the impact of valence weighting biases and self-beliefs on expectations.未来看起来光明吗?加工方式决定了价值权重偏差和自我信念对预期的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Feb;116(2):193-214. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000136. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Comparative optimism in the spontaneous generation of future life-events.对未来生活事件自然发生的比较性乐观态度。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;47(Pt 3):441-51. doi: 10.1348/014466607X236023. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
7
Expectancy bias in anxious samples.焦虑样本中的期望偏差。
Emotion. 2014 Jun;14(3):588-601. doi: 10.1037/a0035899. Epub 2014 May 5.
8
Different Brain Circuitries Mediating Controllable and Uncontrollable Pain.介导可控性和不可控性疼痛的不同脑回路
J Neurosci. 2016 May 4;36(18):5013-25. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1954-15.2016.
9
To prove or to improve? Which motive distorts perceptions of personality controllability?是证明还是改进?哪种动机扭曲了对人格可控性的认知?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Nov;33(11):1572-86. doi: 10.1177/0146167207305539.
10
Patrolling the boundaries of social domains: Neural activations to violations of expectations for romantic and work relationships.巡逻社交领域的边界:违反浪漫关系和工作关系期望的神经激活。
Soc Neurosci. 2021 Oct;16(5):513-521. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2021.1953134. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
A fine-grained labeled dataset for textual sentiment analysis in technical education.一个用于技术教育中文本情感分析的细粒度标记数据集。
Data Brief. 2024 Nov 9;57:111120. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.111120. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
People's reports of unexpected events for everyday scenarios: Over 1000 textual responses, human-labelled for valence/sentiment, controllability and topic category.人们对日常场景中意外事件的报告:超过1000条文本回复,由人工标注效价/情感、可控性和主题类别。
Data Brief. 2022 Aug 17;44:108545. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108545. eCollection 2022 Oct.