Peacock Jeffrey, Sikaria Dhiraj, Maun-Garcia Laura, Javedan Khosrow, Yamoah Kosj, Parikh Nainesh
Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Nov 21;6(3):100619. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.11.004. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.
Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is an effective therapy for alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, is not well studied in patients with concurrent prostate cancer (PCa). We demonstrate a proof of concept for PAE before definitive radiation therapy (RT) in patients with PCa.
From December 2017 to July 2019, 9 patients with PCa underwent PAE for the indication of LUTS from benign prostatic hyperplasia with concurrent PCa. Five received radiation and all follow-ups at our institution and were therefore included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 18 months from the time of PAE. Side effects during radiation were quantified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scoring system. Pre- and post-PAE plans were compared in the 5 patients by performing an isovolumetric expansion of the post-PAE plan (treated plan) equivalent to the measured volume reduction after PAE. Patient 1 (PT-01) and PT-02 had prostate RT alone whereas PT-03, PT-04, and PT-05 had prostate with elective nodal coverage RT. Mean doses to organs at risk were compared between the 2 plans.
The mean International Prostate Symptom Score reduction after PAE was 13.8 (5.0-30.0; = .02). The mean prostatic volume reduction after PAE was 23.1% (7.2%-47.7%). There were no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 (severe) or higher during radiation. Post-PAE plans in PT-01 and PT-02 had on average 23.2%, 39.8%, and 22.9% decrease in mean dose across the bladder, rectum, and penile bulb, respectively, compared with the pre-PAE plans. There were no appreciable differences in dosimetry in PT03, PT-04, and PT-05 who had nodal coverage. There was no biochemical failure in any of the patients.
We demonstrate a proof of concept that PAE is a clinically significant adjunctive therapy for alleviating LUTS and achieving significant volume reduction before RT, resulting in decreased radiation-related toxicity from RT for PCa.
前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)是缓解良性前列腺增生患者下尿路症状(LUTS)的有效治疗方法;然而,对于合并前列腺癌(PCa)的患者,该方法尚未得到充分研究。我们展示了在PCa患者进行确定性放射治疗(RT)之前应用PAE的概念验证。
2017年12月至2019年7月,9例PCa患者因良性前列腺增生合并PCa导致的LUTS接受了PAE治疗。5例患者在我们机构接受了放疗及所有随访,因此纳入分析。自PAE治疗后中位随访时间为18个月。使用不良事件通用术语标准评分系统对放疗期间的副作用进行量化。通过对PAE后计划(治疗计划)进行等容扩张,使其等同于PAE后测量的体积减少量,对5例患者的PAE前后计划进行比较。患者1(PT - 01)和PT - 02仅接受前列腺放疗,而PT - 03、PT - 04和PT - 05接受前列腺及选择性淋巴结覆盖放疗。比较两个计划中危及器官的平均剂量。
PAE后国际前列腺症状评分平均降低13.8(5.0 - 30.0;P = 0.02)。PAE后前列腺体积平均减少23.1%(7.2% - 47.7%)。放疗期间无不良事件通用术语标准3级(严重)或更高等级的情况。与PAE前计划相比,PT - 01和PT - 02的PAE后计划中膀胱、直肠和阴茎球部的平均剂量分别平均降低23.2%、39.8%和22.9%。有淋巴结覆盖的PT03、PT - 04和PT - 05在剂量测定方面无明显差异。所有患者均未出现生化失败。
我们展示了一个概念验证,即PAE是一种具有临床意义的辅助治疗方法,可缓解LUTS并在放疗前实现显著的体积缩小,从而降低PCa放疗相关的毒性。