Suppr超能文献

一项关于在前列腺癌确定性放射治疗前使用前列腺动脉栓塞术的概念验证研究。

A Proof-of-Concept Study on the Use of Prostate Artery Embolization Before Definitive Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Peacock Jeffrey, Sikaria Dhiraj, Maun-Garcia Laura, Javedan Khosrow, Yamoah Kosj, Parikh Nainesh

机构信息

Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.

Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Nov 21;6(3):100619. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.11.004. eCollection 2021 May-Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) is an effective therapy for alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, is not well studied in patients with concurrent prostate cancer (PCa). We demonstrate a proof of concept for PAE before definitive radiation therapy (RT) in patients with PCa.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From December 2017 to July 2019, 9 patients with PCa underwent PAE for the indication of LUTS from benign prostatic hyperplasia with concurrent PCa. Five received radiation and all follow-ups at our institution and were therefore included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 18 months from the time of PAE. Side effects during radiation were quantified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scoring system. Pre- and post-PAE plans were compared in the 5 patients by performing an isovolumetric expansion of the post-PAE plan (treated plan) equivalent to the measured volume reduction after PAE. Patient 1 (PT-01) and PT-02 had prostate RT alone whereas PT-03, PT-04, and PT-05 had prostate with elective nodal coverage RT. Mean doses to organs at risk were compared between the 2 plans.

RESULTS

The mean International Prostate Symptom Score reduction after PAE was 13.8 (5.0-30.0; = .02). The mean prostatic volume reduction after PAE was 23.1% (7.2%-47.7%). There were no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 (severe) or higher during radiation. Post-PAE plans in PT-01 and PT-02 had on average 23.2%, 39.8%, and 22.9% decrease in mean dose across the bladder, rectum, and penile bulb, respectively, compared with the pre-PAE plans. There were no appreciable differences in dosimetry in PT03, PT-04, and PT-05 who had nodal coverage. There was no biochemical failure in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate a proof of concept that PAE is a clinically significant adjunctive therapy for alleviating LUTS and achieving significant volume reduction before RT, resulting in decreased radiation-related toxicity from RT for PCa.

摘要

目的

前列腺动脉栓塞术(PAE)是缓解良性前列腺增生患者下尿路症状(LUTS)的有效治疗方法;然而,对于合并前列腺癌(PCa)的患者,该方法尚未得到充分研究。我们展示了在PCa患者进行确定性放射治疗(RT)之前应用PAE的概念验证。

方法和材料

2017年12月至2019年7月,9例PCa患者因良性前列腺增生合并PCa导致的LUTS接受了PAE治疗。5例患者在我们机构接受了放疗及所有随访,因此纳入分析。自PAE治疗后中位随访时间为18个月。使用不良事件通用术语标准评分系统对放疗期间的副作用进行量化。通过对PAE后计划(治疗计划)进行等容扩张,使其等同于PAE后测量的体积减少量,对5例患者的PAE前后计划进行比较。患者1(PT - 01)和PT - 02仅接受前列腺放疗,而PT - 03、PT - 04和PT - 05接受前列腺及选择性淋巴结覆盖放疗。比较两个计划中危及器官的平均剂量。

结果

PAE后国际前列腺症状评分平均降低13.8(5.0 - 30.0;P = 0.02)。PAE后前列腺体积平均减少23.1%(7.2% - 47.7%)。放疗期间无不良事件通用术语标准3级(严重)或更高等级的情况。与PAE前计划相比,PT - 01和PT - 02的PAE后计划中膀胱、直肠和阴茎球部的平均剂量分别平均降低23.2%、39.8%和22.9%。有淋巴结覆盖的PT03、PT - 04和PT - 05在剂量测定方面无明显差异。所有患者均未出现生化失败。

结论

我们展示了一个概念验证,即PAE是一种具有临床意义的辅助治疗方法,可缓解LUTS并在放疗前实现显著的体积缩小,从而降低PCa放疗相关的毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6206/7966837/94d795536f5d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验