Suppr超能文献

大学生对干预酒精和大麻使用方法的接受程度。

College students' receptiveness to intervention approaches for alcohol and cannabis use.

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2022 Mar;36(2):157-176. doi: 10.1037/adb0000699. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Addressing high-risk alcohol and cannabis use represent major challenges to institutions of higher education. A range of evidence-based treatment approaches are available, but little is known concerning students' receptiveness to such approaches. Prior work identified that students were most open to individual therapy and self-help options for reducing alcohol use, but less open to medication. The current study examines student receptiveness to intervention approaches across a wider range of intervention approaches (e.g., remote/telehealth), and extends to evaluate cannabis intervention receptiveness.

METHOD

Undergraduate students reported on alcohol and cannabis use, motives for and reasons against use, and openness to an array of interventions for reducing alcohol and cannabis use.

RESULTS

Informal options (self-help, talking with family/friends), individual therapy, and appointments with a primary care provider (PCP) were endorsed most frequently. Group therapy and medication were less commonly endorsed, though medication was endorsed at a higher prevalence than in prior studies. Women generally expressed higher receptiveness than men. Lower alcohol consumption was associated with increased receptiveness to some approaches. Students at high risk for alcohol and/or cannabis dependence were less receptive to many treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

College students were open to a wide variety of approaches for reducing their alcohol and cannabis use. These results can inform selection, implementation, and availability of campus-wide services, especially as low-cost technological-based approaches are expanding. Further attention to existing services (e.g., PCP) for addressing alcohol and cannabis use may be considered, given students' receptiveness to such approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

解决高风险的酒精和大麻使用问题是高等教育机构面临的主要挑战。有一系列基于证据的治疗方法可用,但对于学生对这些方法的接受程度知之甚少。先前的工作表明,学生对减少酒精使用的个体治疗和自助选择最为开放,但对药物治疗的接受程度较低。本研究考察了学生对更广泛的干预方法(例如远程/远程医疗)的干预接受程度,并扩展到评估大麻干预接受程度。

方法

大学生报告了酒精和大麻的使用情况、使用的动机和原因,以及对一系列减少酒精和大麻使用的干预措施的接受程度。

结果

非正式的选择(自助、与家人/朋友交谈)、个体治疗和与初级保健提供者(PCP)预约最常被认可。小组治疗和药物治疗较少被认可,尽管药物治疗的认可度高于之前的研究。女性普遍比男性更愿意接受。较低的酒精摄入量与对某些方法的接受程度增加有关。酒精和/或大麻依赖风险较高的学生对许多治疗选择的接受程度较低。

结论

大学生对各种减少酒精和大麻使用的方法持开放态度。这些结果可以为校园服务的选择、实施和提供提供信息,特别是随着低成本技术方法的扩展。鉴于学生对这些方法的接受程度,可以进一步关注现有的服务(例如 PCP)来解决酒精和大麻使用问题。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
The Drinking Dashboard for alcohol-induced blackout: A randomized pilot trial.酒精性失忆的饮酒仪表盘:一项随机试点试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2025 Jun;49(6):1273-1285. doi: 10.1111/acer.70042. Epub 2025 May 30.

本文引用的文献

9
High-Intensity Drinking.高强度饮酒
Alcohol Res. 2018;39(1):49-55.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验