Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2023 Nov;91(11):652-664. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000845. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
This study determined the characteristics of engagement and whether engagement in an adaptive preventive intervention (API) was associated with reduced binge drinking and alcohol-related consequences.
Incoming students were recruited for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART; = 891, 62.4% female, 76.8% non-Hispanic White) with an assessment-only control group. The API occurred during the first semester of college, with outcomes assessed at the end of the semester. The API involved two stages. Stage 1 included universal intervention components (personalized normative feedback [PNF] and self-monitoring). Stage 2 bridged heavy drinkers to access additional resources. We estimated the effect of engagement in Stage 1 only and in the whole API (Stages 1 and 2) among the intervention group, and the effect of the API versus control had all students assigned an API engaged, on alcohol-related outcomes.
Precollege binge drinking, intention to pledge a fraternity/sorority, and higher conformity motives were most associated with lower odds of Stage 1 engagement. Action (readiness to change) and PNF engagement were associated with Stage 2 engagement. API engagement was associated with significant reductions in alcohol-related consequences among heavy drinkers. Compared to the control, we estimated the API would reduce the relative increase in alcohol-related consequences from baseline to follow-up by 25%, had all API students engaged.
Even partial engagement in each component of the "light-touch" API rendered benefits. Analyses suggested that had all students in the intervention group engaged, the API would significantly reduce the change in alcohol-related consequences over the first semester in college. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
本研究旨在确定参与度的特征,以及参与适应性预防干预(API)是否与减少 binge drinking 和与酒精相关的后果有关。
本研究招募了一批即将入学的学生,进行了一项顺序多项分配随机试验(SMART;=891,62.4%为女性,76.8%为非西班牙裔白人),并设立了一个仅评估的对照组。API 发生在大学的第一学期,在学期末评估结果。API 包括两个阶段。第一阶段包括普遍干预组件(个性化规范反馈[PNF]和自我监测)。第二阶段将大量饮酒者与额外资源联系起来。我们估计了干预组中仅参与第一阶段和整个 API(第一阶段和第二阶段)的参与度的效果,以及 API 与对照组相比,所有被分配 API 的学生的参与度对与酒精相关的结果的影响。
大学前 binge drinking、加入兄弟会/姐妹会的意图以及更高的从众动机与较低的第一阶段参与度的可能性最相关。行动(改变的准备)和 PNF 的参与与第二阶段的参与有关。API 的参与与大量饮酒者的与酒精相关的后果显著减少有关。与对照组相比,我们估计如果所有参与 API 的学生都参与,API 将减少基线到随访期间与酒精相关的后果的相对增加 25%。
即使是“轻触式”API 的每个组件的部分参与也会带来好处。分析表明,如果干预组的所有学生都参与,API 将显著减少大学第一学期与酒精相关的后果的变化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。