• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对疾病风险、流行程度和严重程度的认知与实际情况之间存在差异,卫生政策制定者需对此有所了解:一项全国性调查。

What health policy makers need to know about mismatches between public perceptions of disease risk, prevalence and severity: a national survey.

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):979-984. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1881175. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1080/14992027.2021.1881175
PMID:33749476
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess people's perceptions of their personal risk, population prevalence and perceived severity in relation to three key health conditions (cancer, heart disease and hearing loss), gauge the size of any misperceptions, and identify correlates of such misperceptions.

DESIGN

This study was a cross-sectional survey.

STUDY SAMPLE

A total of 10,401 adults representative of the UK population were participated in the study.

RESULTS

Clear majorities of people incorrectly believe that they are at greater personal risk of cancer (>75%), that cancer is more prevalent in the population (>50%) and that cancer is more disabling (>65%), than either heart disease or hearing loss. In turn, people consistently regard their personal risk of hearing loss, the population prevalence of hearing loss and the severity of hearing loss as lower than either cancer or heart disease. Multiple regression analyses showed inconsistent patterns of relationships between people's beliefs, sociodemographic characteristics and their health behaviours.

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy in beliefs about cancer, heart disease and hearing loss is low, and the relationships between these beliefs, their potential antecedents and consequences are complex. Policy makers should ensure close adherence to evidence or risk-making decisions that are costly both in financial terms and in terms of suboptimal population subjective well-being.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估人们对个人风险、人群患病率和与三种主要健康状况(癌症、心脏病和听力损失)相关的感知严重程度的认知,衡量任何误解的大小,并确定这些误解的相关因素。

设计

本研究是一项横断面调查。

研究样本

共有 10401 名具有英国代表性的成年人参与了这项研究。

结果

绝大多数人错误地认为他们患癌症的个人风险更高(>75%),癌症在人群中的患病率更高(>50%),癌症的致残性更强(>65%),而不是心脏病或听力损失。相反,人们始终认为他们的听力损失个人风险、听力损失的人群患病率和听力损失的严重程度低于癌症或心脏病。多元回归分析显示,人们的信念、社会人口特征与其健康行为之间的关系模式不一致。

结论

对癌症、心脏病和听力损失的信念准确性较低,这些信念及其潜在的前因和后果之间的关系复杂。政策制定者应确保密切遵循证据或风险决策,这些决策在经济方面和人口主观幸福感不佳方面都代价高昂。

相似文献

1
What health policy makers need to know about mismatches between public perceptions of disease risk, prevalence and severity: a national survey.公众对疾病风险、流行程度和严重程度的认知与实际情况之间存在差异,卫生政策制定者需对此有所了解:一项全国性调查。
Int J Audiol. 2021 Dec;60(12):979-984. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1881175. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
Heart disease versus cancer: understanding perceptions of population prevalence and personal risk.心脏病与癌症:理解人群患病率和个人风险的认知。
J Behav Med. 2017 Oct;40(5):839-845. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9860-0. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
3
Promotion of health sector reforms for health systems strengthening in Nigeria: perceptions of policy makers versus the general public on the Nigeria health systems performance.促进尼日利亚卫生部门改革以加强卫生系统:决策者与公众对尼日利亚卫生系统绩效的看法。
Soc Work Public Health. 2013;28(6):541-53. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2011.592085.
4
Epidemiology of the extent of recreational noise exposure and hearing protection use: cross-sectional survey in a nationally representative UK adult population sample.娱乐性噪声暴露程度和听力保护用具使用的流行病学:英国全国代表性成年人群体样本的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 9;20(1):1529. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09602-8.
5
Use of Rapid Online Surveys to Assess People's Perceptions During Infectious Disease Outbreaks: A Cross-sectional Survey on COVID-19.利用快速在线调查评估传染病暴发期间人们的认知:一项关于新冠肺炎的横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 2;22(4):e18790. doi: 10.2196/18790.
6
How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.研究证据在卫生政策中的应用是如何被感知的?研究人员和政策制定者报告的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0345-6.
7
Public perceptions, anxiety and the perceived efficacy of health-protective behaviours to mitigate the spread of the SARS-Cov-2/ COVID-19 pandemic.公众认知、焦虑与健康保护行为在减轻 SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 大流行传播方面的感知效果。
Public Health. 2020 Oct;187:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
8
More of the same? Conflicting perspectives of obesity causation and intervention amongst overweight people, health professionals and policy makers.照旧?超重人群、健康专业人士和政策制定者对肥胖成因和干预的看法存在冲突。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(7):1042-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
9
Cost-containment in the Netherlands: government policy versus public opinion.荷兰的成本控制:政府政策与公众舆论
Health Policy. 1985;5(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(85)90066-1.
10
Prevalence of and Characteristics Associated With Self-reported Good Hearing in a Population With Elevated Audiometric Thresholds.在听阈升高的人群中,自我报告听力良好的流行率及相关特征。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul 1;145(7):626-633. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1020.

引用本文的文献

1
Do hearing loss interventions prevent dementia?听力损失干预措施能否预防痴呆症?
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Jul;56(4):261-268. doi: 10.1007/s00391-023-02178-z. Epub 2023 May 4.
2
A Narrative Review of Lifestyle Risk Factors and the Role of Oxidative Stress in Age-Related Hearing Loss.生活方式风险因素与氧化应激在年龄相关性听力损失中的作用的叙述性综述
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Apr 4;12(4):878. doi: 10.3390/antiox12040878.
3
Shedding Light on SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccination, and Auditory Symptoms: Causality or Spurious Conjunction?
阐明 SARS-CoV-2、COVID-19、COVID-19 疫苗接种和听觉症状之间的关系:是因果关系还是偶然关联?
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;10:837513. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.837513. eCollection 2022.
4
Perceptions of recurrence risk and behavioural changes among first-ever and recurrent stroke survivors: A qualitative analysis.首次和复发性脑卒中幸存者对复发风险的认知和行为变化:一项定性分析。
Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):1962-1970. doi: 10.1111/hex.13335. Epub 2021 Aug 6.