• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰的成本控制:政府政策与公众舆论

Cost-containment in the Netherlands: government policy versus public opinion.

作者信息

Spek J, Penninx F, Lapré R M

出版信息

Health Policy. 1985;5(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(85)90066-1.

DOI:10.1016/0168-8510(85)90066-1
PMID:10273837
Abstract

This article deals with the lack of information on the side of policy makers, especially the national government, on the opinions of the population with regard to cost-containment. Often important policy matters are developed before the preferences of the public have been adequately sounded. An insight into the view of the public can be obtained by representative surveys among the population. In the article the results are given of a survey conducted in 1984. One of the conclusions is that there are well-balanced opinions on cost-containment in health care among the public. It appears that the public is willing to accept financial cuts, even up to 10%. The public would also agree on less use of hospital beds. However, a majority of the public rejects a reduction of beds. Another conclusion reached by the authors is, that the government should give more information to the public about the consequences of less use of beds, in relation to the total amount of beds, in financial as well as in medical respect.

摘要

本文探讨了政策制定者,尤其是国家政府,在成本控制方面缺乏民众意见的问题。重要的政策事项往往在尚未充分了解公众偏好的情况下就已制定。通过对民众进行代表性调查,可以深入了解公众的观点。本文给出了1984年进行的一项调查结果。其中一个结论是,公众对医疗保健成本控制的意见较为平衡。似乎公众愿意接受财政削减,甚至高达10%。公众也会同意减少医院病床的使用。然而,大多数公众反对削减病床数量。作者得出的另一个结论是,政府应就减少病床使用的后果,包括与病床总数的关系、财政和医疗方面,向公众提供更多信息。

相似文献

1
Cost-containment in the Netherlands: government policy versus public opinion.荷兰的成本控制:政府政策与公众舆论
Health Policy. 1985;5(1):73-81. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(85)90066-1.
2
Eleven cost containment tools.十一种成本控制工具。
Natl Underwrit Life Health. 1984 Dec 22;88(51):9, 16.
3
Containing U.S. health care costs: what bullet to bite?控制美国医疗保健成本:该咬哪颗子弹?
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1991:1-12.
4
Health care cost containment: an overview of policy options.医疗成本控制:政策选择概述
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jan;23(1):103-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70015-x.
5
Cost containment: Europe. Germany.成本控制:欧洲。德国。
New Horiz. 1994 Aug;2(3):364-74.
6
Public opinion--that's what matters!公众舆论——这才是关键!
Can Nurse. 1991 Apr;87(4):3.
7
A postelection look at healthcare reform.选举后对医疗改革的审视。
Health Prog. 1993 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-5.
8
An American approach to health system reform.美国的医疗体系改革之路。
JAMA. 1991 May 15;265(19):2537-40.
9
The fat kid on the seesaw: American business and health care cost containment, 1970-1990.
Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:157-75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.001105.
10
The Administration's program for health cost containment.政府控制医疗成本的计划。
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1980 Jan-Feb;56(1):9-18.