Int J Prosthodont. 2022 May/June;35(3):357–364. doi: 10.11607/ijp.7430. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
To digitally evaluate the volumetric wear of four different implant-crown materials and their antagonists after artificial aging using an intraoral scanner (IOS) device and a laboratory desktop scanner.
A total of 48 implants were restored with monolithic crowns divided according to restorative material: lithium disilicate (LDS), zirconia (ZR), polymerinfiltrated ceramic network (PICN), and porcelain fused to metal (PFM). Each specimen was scanned using a desktop scanner (LAB; iScan D104, IMETRIC 3D) and an IOS (TRIOS 3, 3Shape) before and after chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles, 49 N, steatite antagonist, 5°C to 50°C). The obtained STL files were superimposed, and the volumetric loss of substance of the crowns and their antagonists was quantified (Materialise 3-matic). Kruskal-Wallis, Spearman rho, and paired t tests were used to analyze the data (α = .05).
The means of volume loss for each restorative material varied between 0.05 ± 0.06 mm (ZR with IOS) and 3.42 ± 1.65 mm (LDS with LAB). The wear of the antagonists was significantly lower (P < .05) for ZR than the other groups. Increased wear of the crowns was highly correlated with increased wear of their antagonists (r = 0.859). When comparing the wear measurement using the two scanning devices, no difference in mean volume loss was found (IOS: 1.81 ± 1.81 mm; LAB: 1.82 ± 1.78 mm) (P = .596).
Polished ZR was the most wear-resistant material and the least abrasive to the respective antagonist among the tested ceramics. For the quantification of wear, this IOS device can be used as an alternative to desktop scanners.
使用口腔内扫描仪(IOS)设备和实验室台式扫描仪对四种不同的种植体-冠材料及其对颌材料进行人工老化后的体积磨损进行数字化评估。
共 48 个种植体用整体冠修复,根据修复材料分为:锂硅石(LDS)、氧化锆(ZR)、聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(PICN)和烤瓷熔附金属(PFM)。每个试件均先用台式扫描仪(LAB;iScan D104,IMETRIC 3D)和 IOS(TRIOS 3,3Shape)扫描,然后进行咀嚼模拟(120 万次循环,49N,滑石对颌,5°C 至 50°C)。获得的 STL 文件被叠加,测量冠及其对颌材料的物质体积损失(Materialise 3-matic)。采用 Kruskal-Wallis、Spearman rho 和配对 t 检验对数据进行分析(α=0.05)。
每种修复材料的体积损失平均值在 0.05±0.06mm(IOS 下的 ZR)和 3.42±1.65mm(LAB 下的 LDS)之间。ZR 对颌材料的磨损明显低于其他组(P<0.05)。冠的磨损与对颌材料的磨损高度相关(r=0.859)。当比较两种扫描设备的磨损测量值时,未发现平均体积损失有差异(IOS:1.81±1.81mm;LAB:1.82±1.78mm)(P=0.596)。
在测试的陶瓷材料中,抛光 ZR 是最耐磨的材料,对相应的对颌材料的磨损最小。对于磨损的定量分析,该 IOS 设备可以替代台式扫描仪。