Basel Pharmacoepidemiology Unit, Division of Clinical Pharmacy and Epidemiology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Hospital Pharmacy, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2639-2647. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06651-6. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
Statins are effective lipid-lowering drugs for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but muscular adverse events can limit their use. Hydrophilic statins (pravastatin, rosuvastatin) may cause less muscular events than lipophilic statins (e.g. simvastatin, atorvastatin) due to lower passive diffusion into muscle cells.
To compare the risk of muscular events between statins at comparable lipid-lowering doses and to evaluate if hydrophilic statins are associated with a lower muscular risk than lipophilic statins.
DESIGN/SETTING: Propensity score-matched cohort study using data from the United Kingdom-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD.
New statin users. Cohort 1: pravastatin 20-40 mg (hydrophilic) vs simvastatin 10-20 mg (lipophilic), cohort 2: rosuvastatin 5-40 mg (hydrophilic) vs atorvastatin 10-80 mg (lipophilic), and cohort 3: simvastatin 40-80 mg vs atorvastatin 10-20 mg.
The outcome was a first record of a muscular event (myopathy, myalgia, myositis, rhabdomyolysis) during a maximum follow-up of 1 year.
The propensity score-matched cohorts consisted of 1) 9,703, 2) 7,032, and 3) 37,743 pairs of statin users. Comparing the risk of muscular events between low-intensity pravastatin vs low-intensity simvastatin yielded a HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.64-1.16). In the comparison of moderate- to high-intensity rosuvastatin vs equivalent doses of atorvastatin, we observed a HR of 1.17 (95% CI 0.88-1.56). Moderate- to high-intensity simvastatin was associated with a HR of 1.33 (95% CI 1.16-1.53), when compared with atorvastatin at equivalent doses.
We could not conduct other pairwise comparisons of statins due to small sample size. In the absence of a uniform definition on the comparability of statin doses, the applied dose ratios may not fully match with all literature sources.
Our results do not suggest a systematically lower risk of muscular events for hydrophilic statins when compared to lipophilic statins at comparable lipid-lowering doses.
他汀类药物是预防心血管疾病的有效降脂药物,但肌肉不良事件会限制其使用。亲水性他汀类药物(普伐他汀、瑞舒伐他汀)引起的肌肉事件可能比亲脂性他汀类药物(如辛伐他汀、阿托伐他汀)少,这是由于它们较少被动扩散到肌肉细胞中。
比较降脂剂量相当的他汀类药物发生肌肉事件的风险,并评估亲水性他汀类药物与亲脂性他汀类药物相比是否与较低的肌肉风险相关。
设计/设置:利用英国临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)GOLD 数据库中的数据,进行倾向评分匹配队列研究。
新使用他汀类药物的患者。队列 1:普伐他汀 20-40mg(亲水性)与辛伐他汀 10-20mg(亲脂性),队列 2:瑞舒伐他汀 5-40mg(亲水性)与阿托伐他汀 10-80mg(亲脂性),队列 3:辛伐他汀 40-80mg 与阿托伐他汀 10-20mg。
主要观察指标为在最大 1 年随访期间首次出现肌肉事件(肌病、肌痛、肌炎、横纹肌溶解症)的记录。
经倾向评分匹配的队列包括 1)9703 对,2)7032 对,和 3)37743 对他汀类药物使用者。比较低强度普伐他汀与低强度辛伐他汀发生肌肉事件的风险,结果显示 HR 为 0.86(95%CI 0.64-1.16)。在比较中高强度瑞舒伐他汀与等效剂量阿托伐他汀时,我们观察到 HR 为 1.17(95%CI 0.88-1.56)。与等效剂量的阿托伐他汀相比,中高强度辛伐他汀的 HR 为 1.33(95%CI 1.16-1.53)。
由于样本量小,我们无法对他汀类药物进行其他两两比较。由于缺乏他汀类药物剂量可比性的统一定义,应用的剂量比可能与所有文献来源不完全匹配。
在降脂剂量相当的情况下,我们的结果并未表明亲水性他汀类药物与亲脂性他汀类药物相比肌肉不良事件的风险系统降低。