Suppr超能文献

肉用种公鸡品系中的脂肪沉积。5. 针对肥胖进行直接选择和间接选择的经济效率比较。

Fat deposition in a broiler sire strain. 5. Comparisons of economic efficiency of direct and indirect selection against fatness.

作者信息

Leenstra F R

机构信息

Spelderholt Centre for Poultry Research and Extension, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Beekbergen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 1988 Jan;67(1):16-24. doi: 10.3382/ps.0670016.

Abstract

In a simulation study, selection for weight gain in a broiler sire strain was compared with 1) one and two stage index selection for weight gain and feed conversion and 2) weight gain, slaughter yield, and percentage abdominal fat. Weight gain per day was assigned an economic value of 1.138 Dutch cents (ct)1/g; feed conversion, -138.18 ct/1.0; slaughter yield, 0 or 7.55 ct/%; and percentage abdominal fat, 0 or -10 ct/%. When selection was completely or almost completely (as in two stage selection) based on weight gain, percentage abdominal fat increased; otherwise it decreased. Weight gain, feed conversion, and slaughter yield improved with all selection methods examined. Due to the high positive correlation between feed conversion and percentage abdominal fat, selection for an index of weight gain and feed conversion gave about the same reduction in percentage abdominal fat as selection for an index of weight gain, slaughter yield, and percentage abdominal fat. Selection response of the four traits was dependent more on selection methods than on sets of economic values. Based on economic values, selection for an index of weight gain and feed conversion gave 1.70 to 3.35 times the financial gain of selection for weight gain only, and selection for an index of weight gain, slaughter yield, and percentage abdominal fat gave 1.15 to 3.12 times that attained by selection only for weight gain. The extra financial gains exceeded by far the estimated additional costs of the index selection methods.

摘要

在一项模拟研究中,对肉用种公鸡品系的体重增加选择与以下两种情况进行了比较:1)对体重增加和饲料转化率进行单阶段和两阶段指数选择;2)对体重增加、屠宰率和腹部脂肪百分比进行选择。每天的体重增加被赋予1.138荷兰分(ct)/克的经济价值;饲料转化率为-138.18 ct/1.0;屠宰率为0或7.55 ct/%;腹部脂肪百分比为0或-10 ct/%。当选择完全或几乎完全基于体重增加时(如两阶段选择),腹部脂肪百分比增加;否则则降低。所有研究的选择方法都使体重增加、饲料转化率和屠宰率得到了改善。由于饲料转化率与腹部脂肪百分比之间存在高度正相关,对体重增加和饲料转化率指数进行选择时,腹部脂肪百分比的降低幅度与对体重增加、屠宰率和腹部脂肪百分比指数进行选择时大致相同。这四个性状的选择反应更多地取决于选择方法,而不是经济价值组。基于经济价值,对体重增加和饲料转化率指数进行选择所带来的经济收益是仅对体重增加进行选择的1.70至3.35倍,对体重增加、屠宰率和腹部脂肪百分比指数进行选择所带来的经济收益是仅对体重增加进行选择的1.15至3.12倍。额外的经济收益远远超过了指数选择方法估计的额外成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验