文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

质子泵抑制剂治疗可改善 24 小时 Dx-pH 监测诊断的喉咽反流的 COPD 急性加重患者的肺功能。

Proton pump inhibitor treatment improves pulmonary function in acute exacerbations of COPD patients with 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring-diagnosed laryngopharyngeal reflux.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated People's Hospital to Ningbo University, Yinzhou People's Hospital, Ningbo City, P.R. China.

出版信息

Clin Respir J. 2021 May;15(5):558-567. doi: 10.1111/crj.13347. Epub 2021 Mar 15.


DOI:10.1111/crj.13347
PMID:33751792
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients have higher laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR)-related symptom incidence. But LPR treatment is empirical. We aimed to determine the frequency of LPR, diagnosed by 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring, among acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) patients with Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) ≥13 and investigate proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment effect on LPR, COPD symptoms, and pulmonary function. METHODS: From January 2016 to September 2017, 102 AECOPD patients with RSI ≥13 were enrolled. COPD assessment test (CAT), mMRC dyspnea scale, pulmonary function tests, and 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring were performed. The Ryan score was evaluated by using the Dx-pH DataView Lite software, which identifies patients with abnormal pharyngeal pH environments. Associations among RSI, pulmonary function test results, and Ryan score parameters were evaluated. The abovementioned assessments were reperformed after treatment, and pre- and posttreatment data were compared. RESULTS: Of the 102 eligible patients, 49 (48.04%) were diagnosed with LPR based on Ryan score. Percentage of the forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1%) was significantly worse in Ryan-positive than in Ryan-negative AECOPD patients. There were significant negative correlations between FEV1% and Ryan score (r = -0.394, P < 0.001), FEV1% and % time below pH threshold (r = -0.371, P < 0.001) in upright position but not in supine position. There was no significant correlation between RSI and Ryan score parameters. There were significant improvements in RSI, mMRC, CAT, and FEV1% in Ryan-positive AECOPD patients after PPI and basic treatments. CONCLUSION: Study results indicate unreliability of RSI threshold for LPR diagnosis. Combination of symptoms, endoscopic findings, and 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring is recommended for LPR diagnosis and PPI treatment decisions, especially in difficult-to-control or severe COPD patients.

摘要

目的:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的咽喉反流(LPR)相关症状发生率较高。但 LPR 的治疗是经验性的。我们旨在确定通过 24 小时 Dx-pH 监测诊断的 LPR 在反流症状指数(RSI)≥13 的 COPD 急性加重(AECOPD)患者中的频率,并研究质子泵抑制剂(PPI)对 LPR、COPD 症状和肺功能的治疗效果。

方法:2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月,纳入 102 例 RSI≥13 的 AECOPD 患者。进行 COPD 评估测试(CAT)、mMRC 呼吸困难量表、肺功能检查和 24 小时 Dx-pH 监测。使用 Dx-pH DataView Lite 软件评估 Ryan 评分,该软件可识别存在异常咽 pH 环境的患者。评估 RSI、肺功能检查结果和 Ryan 评分参数之间的相关性。治疗后重复上述评估,并比较治疗前后的数据。

结果:在 102 名符合条件的患者中,根据 Ryan 评分,49 名(48.04%)患者被诊断为 LPR。Ryan 阳性的 AECOPD 患者的 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1%)明显更差。Ryan 阳性的 AECOPD 患者的 FEV1%与 Ryan 评分呈显著负相关(r=-0.394,P<0.001),FEV1%与直立位时 pH 阈值以下时间的百分比呈显著负相关(r=-0.371,P<0.001),但在仰卧位时无显著相关性。RSI 与 Ryan 评分参数之间无显著相关性。Ryan 阳性的 AECOPD 患者在接受 PPI 和基础治疗后,RSI、mMRC、CAT 和 FEV1%均有显著改善。

结论:研究结果表明 RSI 阈值用于诊断 LPR 不可靠。建议对 LPR 诊断和 PPI 治疗决策采用症状、内镜检查结果和 24 小时 Dx-pH 监测相结合的方法,尤其是在难以控制或严重的 COPD 患者中。

相似文献

[1]
Proton pump inhibitor treatment improves pulmonary function in acute exacerbations of COPD patients with 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring-diagnosed laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Clin Respir J. 2021-5

[2]
[Correlation analysis between Dx-pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020-1-7

[3]
The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012-2-2

[4]
Nissen fundoplication proton pump inhibitors for laryngopharyngeal reflux based on pH-monitoring and symptom-scale.

World J Gastroenterol. 2017-5-21

[5]
Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Comparison between 24-hour pH-Impedance Testing and Pharyngeal Probe (Restech) Testing, with Introduction of the Sataloff Score.

J Voice. 2023-9

[6]
[Preliminary application of Dx-pH monitoring system in laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].

Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016-9-7

[7]
Relationship between extralaryngeal endoscopic findings, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) response, and pH measures in suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Dis Esophagus. 2019-4-1

[8]
Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux on Posttreatment Symptoms and Hypopharyngeal pH.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014-6

[9]
[Laryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR) in patients with persistent hoarseness].

Otolaryngol Pol. 2012

[10]
Oropharyngeal pH Testing Does Not Predict Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Laryngeal Symptoms.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2016-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Association between reflux esophagitis and pulmonary function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

J Thorac Dis. 2024-10-31

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索