• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规 pH 监测在咽喉反流病诊断和治疗中的价值。

The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun;146(6):952-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599812436952. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1177/0194599812436952
PMID:22301104
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the need for pH testing in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series with planned data collection.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

On the basis of symptoms and/or abnormal endoscopic findings, more than 500 patients underwent 24-hour pharyngeal pH testing at a single center (using the Dx-pH probe) between January 2009 and June 2011. A total of 163 patients not on proton-pump inhibitors at the time of study and with complete data available for analysis (pH results, body mass index, smoking status, pretest reflux symptom index) were divided into 2 groups by positive (n = 70) and negative (n = 93) Ryan Score. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) was compared between groups and assessed overall against Ryan Score parameters at different pH thresholds. The diagnostic utility of an RSI ≥ 13 for prediction of Ryan Score was assessed.

RESULTS

No significant difference in RSI was seen between Ryan-positive (17.50 ± 11.47) and Ryan-negative (14.95 ± 11.43) patients (P = .161). Overall, RSI correlated poorly with percentage time spent below pH thresholds 6.5, 6.0, 5.5, and 5.0 and upright and supine Ryan parameters at these thresholds (as determined by linear regression analysis). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RSI ≥ 13 for Ryan positivity were 55.7%, 47.3%, 44.3%, and 58.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that in our population of otolaryngology patients, the diagnosis of LPR cannot be reliably made on the basis of symptoms alone. Diagnosis, and in particular treatment decisions, should ideally be made on the basis of a combination of symptoms, signs, and confirmatory testing.

摘要

目的

评估 pH 测试在诊断喉咽反流(LPR)中的需求。

研究设计

病例系列,计划数据收集。

设置

三级保健中心。

受试者和方法

根据症状和/或异常的内镜发现,在 2009 年 1 月至 2011 年 6 月期间,超过 500 名患者在一个中心(使用 Dx-pH 探头)进行了 24 小时咽 pH 测试。共有 163 名患者在研究时未服用质子泵抑制剂且有完整的数据可用于分析(pH 结果、体重指数、吸烟状况、预测试反流症状指数),根据 Ryan 评分分为阳性(n = 70)和阴性(n = 93)组。比较两组之间的反流症状指数(RSI),并在不同 pH 阈值下评估总体与 Ryan 评分参数的相关性。评估 RSI≥13 对预测 Ryan 评分的诊断效用。

结果

Ryan 阳性组(17.50±11.47)和 Ryan 阴性组(14.95±11.43)之间的 RSI 无显著差异(P=0.161)。总体而言,RSI 与 pH 阈值 6.5、6.0、5.5 和 5.0 下的时间百分比和直立及仰卧位 Ryan 参数相关性差(通过线性回归分析确定)。RSI≥13 对 Ryan 阳性的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 55.7%、47.3%、44.3%和 58.7%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在我们的耳鼻喉科患者人群中,不能仅根据症状可靠地诊断 LPR。诊断,特别是治疗决策,理想情况下应基于症状、体征和确认性测试的组合。

相似文献

1
The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.常规 pH 监测在咽喉反流病诊断和治疗中的价值。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jun;146(6):952-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599812436952. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
2
Proton pump inhibitor treatment improves pulmonary function in acute exacerbations of COPD patients with 24-hour Dx-pH monitoring-diagnosed laryngopharyngeal reflux.质子泵抑制剂治疗可改善 24 小时 Dx-pH 监测诊断的喉咽反流的 COPD 急性加重患者的肺功能。
Clin Respir J. 2021 May;15(5):558-567. doi: 10.1111/crj.13347. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
LPR: how different diagnostic tools shape the outcomes of treatment.喉咽反流:不同诊断工具如何影响治疗结果
J Voice. 2014 May;28(3):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
4
Diagnosing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Comparison between 24-hour pH-Impedance Testing and Pharyngeal Probe (Restech) Testing, with Introduction of the Sataloff Score.诊断喉咽反流:24 小时 pH-阻抗测试与咽部探头(Restech)测试的比较,并引入 Sataloff 评分。
J Voice. 2023 Sep;37(5):737-747. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
5
[Ryan index for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases].[用于检测喉咽反流疾病的瑞安指数]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 7;52(12):885-889. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2017.12.002.
6
Dual pH with Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance Testing in the Evaluation of Subjective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms.双pH值联合多通道腔内阻抗测试在主观喉咽反流症状评估中的应用
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1177/0194599816665819. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
[Correlation analysis between Dx-pH monitoring and proton pump inhibitor test in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease].[Dx-pH监测与质子泵抑制剂试验在喉咽反流性疾病诊断中的相关性分析]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan 7;55(1):34-39. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2020.01.007.
8
[Clinical research of 24-hour double-probe pH-metry in the laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases].喉咽反流疾病24小时双探头pH测量的临床研究
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):320-3.
9
Composite pH predicts esomeprazole response in laryngopharyngeal reflux without typical reflux syndrome.复合 pH 值可预测无典型反流综合征的咽喉反流中埃索美拉唑的反应。
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jun;123(6):1483-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.23780. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
10
Reflux symptom index and reflux finding score in otolaryngologic practice.反流症状指数和反流发现评分在耳鼻喉科实践中的应用。
J Voice. 2012 May;26(3):e123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation and Reliability of Polish Version of the Reflux Symptoms Index and Reflux Finding Score.波兰版反流症状指数和反流发现评分的效度与信度
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jul 28;10(8):1411. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081411.
2
A simple qualitative scale for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux: high correlations with pH measurements and disease severity. The usefulness of the Warsaw Scale in LPR diagnostics compared to other diagnostic tools.用于诊断喉咽反流的简单定性量表:与 pH 测量值和疾病严重程度高度相关。与其他诊断工具相比,华沙量表在 LPR 诊断中的作用。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Dec;278(12):4883-4892. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06989-x. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
[Value of airway pH monitoring in determining the association between chronic cough and laryngopharyngeal reflux in children].
[气道pH监测在确定儿童慢性咳嗽与喉咽反流之间关联中的价值]
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jul;23(7):713-717. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2102022.
4
Baseline impedance via manometry and ambulatory reflux testing are not equivalent when utilized in the evaluation of potential extra-esophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease.在评估潜在的食管外胃食管反流病时,通过测压法和动态反流测试得出的基线阻抗并不等同。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):5628-5638. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1623.
5
The application of 24-hour pharyngeal pH-monitoring and Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index questionnaires in the diagnostics of laryngopharyngeal reflux.24小时咽pH监测、反流发现评分及反流症状指数问卷在喉咽反流诊断中的应用
Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14(4):274-282. doi: 10.5114/pg.2019.90253. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Weak Acid and Weaker Correlations.喉咽反流:弱酸与弱相关性
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 May;64(5):1070-1071. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-5465-5.
7
Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.酸性咽回流与喉咽反流引起的症状和喉损伤不相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 May;64(5):1270-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5372-1. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
A Comparison of Alkaline Water and Mediterranean Diet vs Proton Pump Inhibition for Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.碱性水和地中海饮食与质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流的比较
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct 1;143(10):1023-1029. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1454.
9
Nissen fundoplication proton pump inhibitors for laryngopharyngeal reflux based on pH-monitoring and symptom-scale.基于 pH 监测和症状量表的尼森胃底折叠术质子泵抑制剂治疗喉咽反流
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 May 21;23(19):3546-3555. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i19.3546.
10
Oropharyngeal pH Testing Does Not Predict Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Laryngeal Symptoms.口咽pH值检测不能预测有喉部症状患者对质子泵抑制剂治疗的反应。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1517-1524. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.145. Epub 2016 Apr 19.