Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
VetMED Emergency and Specialty Veterinary Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2021 Mar;31(2):189-203. doi: 10.1111/vec.13043. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
To systematically review available evidence to develop guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of transfusion-associated reactions in dogs and cats.
Standardized and systemic evaluation of the literature (identified through Medline via PubMed and Google Scholar searches) was carried out for identified transfusion reaction types in dogs and cats. The available evidence was evaluated using PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) questions generated for each reaction type. The evidence was categorized by level of evidence (LOE) and quality (Good, Fair, or Poor). Guidelines, diagnostic, and treatment algorithms were generated based on the evaluation of the evidence. Consensus on the final guidelines was achieved through Delphi-style surveys. Draft recommendations were disseminated through veterinary specialty listservs for review and comments, which were evaluated and integrated prior to final publication.
Medline via PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched. There were 14 Population Intervention Comparison Outcome questions identified and corresponding worksheets were developed focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of transfusion-associated reactions in dogs and cats. Fourteen guidelines and four algorithms were developed with a high degree of consensus.
This systematic evidence evaluation process yielded recommended diagnostic and treatment algorithms for use in practice. However, significant knowledge gaps were identified, demonstrating the need for additional research in veterinary transfusion medicine.
系统回顾现有证据,为犬猫输血相关反应的诊断和治疗制定指南。
对犬猫输血反应类型进行了标准化和系统性文献评估(通过 Medline 经 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 检索)。使用为每种反应类型生成的 PICO(人群、干预、比较、结局)问题对现有证据进行评估。根据证据的水平(LOE)和质量(良好、中等、差)对证据进行分类。根据证据评估生成指南、诊断和治疗算法。通过德尔菲式调查达成最终指南的共识。通过兽医专业名录服务征求草案建议以供审查和评论,在最终发布之前对其进行评估和整合。
搜索了 Medline 经 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 数据库。确定了 14 个人群干预比较结局问题,并制定了相应的工作表,重点关注犬猫输血相关反应的诊断和治疗。制定了 14 项指南和 4 项算法,具有高度共识。
这个系统的证据评估过程产生了推荐的诊断和治疗算法,可用于临床实践。然而,确定了明显的知识空白,表明需要在兽医输血医学领域进行更多的研究。