Suppr超能文献

评估淋巴水肿的估计值:肢体测量的可靠性和有效性。

Estimates for Assessment of Lymphedema: Reliability and Validity of Extremity Measurements.

机构信息

Peracutus B.V., Kronenberg, The Netherlands.

Stemkens.Com B.V., Roggel, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Lymphat Res Biol. 2022 Feb;20(1):48-52. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2019.0082. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

Abstract

Measuring lymphedema with high accuracy is important for several reasons. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of three routinely used methods to estimate limb volumes. Inverse water displacement, girth measurements, and Perometer measurements were executed. Although standard techniques were used, extra precautions were taken to maximize accuracy within and between observers. Water displacement, and girth and Perometer measurements resulted in standard deviations of 0.7%-0.8%, 0.5%, and 0.4%-1.0%, respectively. Measuring limb volumes using routine methods is not easy. Even under optimal conditions, the measurements are quite dependent on the observer. For practical situations, an easy, objective, and reliable method is lacking.

摘要

准确测量淋巴水肿很重要,原因有几个。本研究旨在评估三种常用方法估计肢体体积的可靠性和有效性。采用了反向水置换法、周长测量法和皮尺测量法。尽管使用了标准技术,但为了最大限度地提高观察者内部和之间的准确性,还采取了额外的措施。水置换法、周长和皮尺测量法的标准偏差分别为 0.7%-0.8%、0.5%和 0.4%-1.0%。使用常规方法测量肢体体积并不容易。即使在最佳条件下,测量也非常依赖于观察者。对于实际情况,缺乏一种简单、客观和可靠的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e4f/8892971/f39b74644062/lrb.2019.0082_figure1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验