Kenny Amanda, Dickson-Swift Virginia, McKenna Lisa, Charette Martin, Rush Kathy L, Stacey Gemma, Darvill Angela, Leigh Jacqueline, Burton Rob, Phillips Craig
Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, La Trobe Rural Health School, P.O. Box 199, Bendigo, VIC 3552, Australia.
School Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 May;100:104860. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104860. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
The aim of this mixed methods systematic review was to: i) document the interventions that support and facilitate graduate nurse transition from university to practice in a diversity of healthcare settings and ii) to identify outcomes from graduate nurse transition interventions for the graduate, patient or client, and health service.
This mixed methods systematic review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. All quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies were included if they met the inclusion criteria.
Primary research studies located in Medline, EmBase, CINAHL, Prospero, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, and Web of Science (Social Science Citation Index). All quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies were included if they met the inclusion criteria.
Using a comprehensive search strategy, retrieved articles were screened by two reviewers at the title, abstract, and full-text stage. Reviewer disagreements were discussed until consensus was achieved. The well-validated Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess quality of the quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies.
A total of 130 studies were included as the review dataset. There was a myriad of terms used to describe transition interventions, and programme length and settings varied. The content of transition interventions was not well defined, and there was a lack of studies outside acute hospital settings. Data collection methods varied widely. The majority of authors reported outcomes for the graduate or the graduate and service, with only one reporting outcomes for the patient or client. There was a significant variation in quality across the studies.
This review addresses a significant gap in the literature by documenting transition interventions in a diversity of health settings and outcomes from these interventions. Interest in transition to practice continues to rise, but there is an urgent need to conduct well designed, robust, and larger-scale studies at the national and transnational levels.
本混合方法系统评价的目的是:i)记录在各种医疗环境中支持和促进本科毕业护士从大学过渡到临床实践的干预措施;ii)确定本科毕业护士过渡干预措施对毕业生、患者或服务对象以及卫生服务机构的影响。
本混合方法系统评价遵循系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目。所有符合纳入标准的定量研究、定性研究和混合方法研究均被纳入。
检索了Medline、EmBase、CINAHL、Prospero、Cochrane图书馆、PsycInfo和科学网(社会科学引文索引)中的原始研究。所有符合纳入标准的定量研究、定性研究和混合方法研究均被纳入。
采用全面的检索策略,由两名评审员在标题、摘要和全文阶段对检索到的文章进行筛选。评审员之间的分歧进行了讨论,直至达成共识。使用经过充分验证的混合方法评估工具来评估定量研究、定性研究和混合方法研究的质量。
共有130项研究被纳入综述数据集。用于描述过渡干预措施的术语繁多,项目时长和环境各不相同。过渡干预措施的内容界定不明确,急性医院环境以外的研究较少。数据收集方法差异很大。大多数作者报告了对毕业生或毕业生及服务机构的影响,只有一项报告了对患者或服务对象的影响。各项研究的质量存在显著差异。
本综述通过记录各种卫生环境中的过渡干预措施及其影响,填补了文献中的一个重大空白。对过渡到临床实践的关注度持续上升,但迫切需要在国家和跨国层面开展设计良好、有力且规模更大的研究。